Aramco has the lowest production costs for oil projects in the world, the company said in its newly released IPO prospectus, adding that partner producers such as Russia, Venezuela, and Nigeria had much higher production costs.
The Saudi state company said its after-tax breakeven costs for producing fields were below $10 per barrel, compared with just over $20 per barrel for the UAE, more than $40 per barrel for Russia, and almost $50 per barrel for Nigeria.
While Saudi Aramco says that the cost of producing a barrel of oil from its oilfields is below $10, it is not the cheapest in the world. Iraq has the cheapest production cost in the world.
In 2003 Iraqi production cost was less than a dollar a barrel according to a special report on Iraq by Time Magazine, May 19, 2003, p. 37. The foreign oil companies which signed re-development contracts with the Iraqi government in 2009 to increase production from Iraqi giant oilfields were paid $2 for each barrel of oil produced.
Iraq has the lowest production costs in the world because of two reasons. The first is because of the location of its oil near the surface. The second is because, for geological reasons, Iraq boasts the world’s most prolific wells.
Before Iraq’s oilfields were devastated by three wars between 1979 and 2003, its wells produced an average of 13,700 b/d each compared with 10,200 for Saudi Arabia, 5,700 for Iran, 3,100 for Kuwait, 2,300 for Libya, 1447 for UAE, 988 for Nigeria, 200 for Venezuela and 17 for the United States according to Time Magazine May 19, 2003.
Russia’s current production cost ranges from $17- $20 a barrel and not $40 as Aramco claimed since the Russian economy can happily live with an oil price of $40 or less. It is possible that Russian oil production in the Arctic region could cost $40 a barrel.
Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
International Oil Economist
Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London