Abstract
Blanchard proposed that autogynephilia is a natal male’s paraphilic sexual arousal in response to the thought or fantasy of being a woman. Furthermore, based on evidence collected from natal males with gender dysphoria, Blanchard argued that autogynephilia is the fundamental motivation among nonhomosexual males (i.e., those not exclusively attracted to men) who pursue sex reassignment surgery or live as transgender women. These ideas have been challenged by several writers who have asserted, or offered evidence, that autogynephilia is common among women. However, their evidence was weakened by problematic measures and limited comparison groups. We compared four samples of autogynephilic natal males (N = 1549), four samples of non-autogynephilic natal males (N = 1339), and two samples of natal females (N = 500), using Blanchard’s original measure: the Core Autogynephilia Scale. The autogynephilic samples had much higher mean scores compared with non-autogynephilic natal males and natal females, who were similar. Our findings refute the contention that autogynephilia is common among natal females.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Materials
The item-level and total scores for the Core Autogynephilia Scale are provided as a supplementary file, in Excel format.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
Change history
14 October 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02419-z
References
Alexander, S. (2020). Autogenderphilia is common and not especially related to transgender. Slate Star Codex. https://slatestarcodex.com/2020/02/10/autogenderphilia-is-common-and-not-especially-related-to-transgender/
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Author.
Bailey, J. M. (2009). What is sexual orientation and do women have one? In D. Hope (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities (pp. 43–63). Springer.
Bailey, J. M., & Hsu, K. J. (2017). Orienting basic research on chronophilias [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 23–26.
Blanchard, R. (1985). Research methods for the typological study of gender disorders in males. In B. W. Steiner (Ed.), Gender dysphoria: Development, research, management (pp. 227–257). Plenum Press.
Blanchard, R. (1989a). The classification and labeling of nonhomosexual gender dysphorias. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 18, 315–334.
Blanchard, R. (1989b). The concept of autogynephilia and the typology of male gender dysphoria. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 177, 616–623.
Blanchard, R. (1991). Clinical observations and systematic studies of autogynephilia. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 17, 235–251.
Blanchard, R. (2005). Early history of the concept of autogynephilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 439–446.
Brown, K. (2020). On the science of changing sex: A layman’s guide to transsexuality and transgenderism. Self-published.
Dreger, A. D. (2008). The controversy surrounding The Man Who Would Be Queen: A case history of the politics of science, identity, and sex in the Internet age. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 366–421.
Hayton, D. (2021). Why I became trans. Unherd. https://unherd.com/2021/08/why-i-became-trans/.
Hsu, K. J., Rosenthal, A. M., & Bailey, J. M. (2015). The psychometric structure of items assessing autogynephilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1301–1312.
Hsu, K. J., Rosenthal, A. M., Miller, D. I., & Bailey, J. M. (2017). Sexual arousal patterns of autogynephilic male cross-dressers. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 247–253.
Judd, C. M., McClelland, G. H., & Ryan, C. S. (2017). Data analysis: A model comparison approach to regression, ANOVA, and beyond. Routledge.
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. W. B. Saunders.
Konrad, N., Welke, J., & Opitz-Welke, A. (2015). Paraphilias. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 28, 440–444.
Lawrence, A. A. (2010a). Societal individualism predicts prevalence of nonhomosexual orientation in male-to-female transsexualism. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 573–583.
Lawrence, A. A. (2010b). Something resembling autogynephilia in women: Comment on Moser (2009). Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 1–4.
Lawrence, A. A. (2013). Men trapped in men’s bodies: Narratives of autogynephilic transsexualism. Springer.
Lawrence, A. A. (2017). Autogynephilia and the typology of male-to-female transsexualism. European Psychologist, 22, 39–54.
Lawrence, A. A., Latty, E. M., Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). Measurement of sexual arousal in postoperative male-to-female transsexuals using vaginal photoplethysmography. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 135–145.
Lehmiller, J. J. (2018). Tell me what you want. Da Capo Press.
Moser, C. (2009). Autogynephilia in women. Journal of Homosexuality, 56, 539–547.
Safron, A., Sylva, D., Klimaj, V., Rosenthal, A. M., & Bailey, J. M. (2020). Neural responses to sexual stimuli in heterosexual and homosexual men and women: Men’s responses are more specific. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 433–445.
Serano, J. M. (2010). The case against autogynephilia. International Journal of Transgenderism, 12, 176–187.
Serano, J. (2020). Autogynephilia: A scientific review, feminist analysis, and alternative ‘embodiment fantasies’ model. Sociological Review, 68(4), 763–778.
Veale, J. F., Clarke, D. E., & Lomax, T. C. (2008). Sexuality of male-to-female transsexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 586–597.
Yardley, M. (2017). A history of autogynephilia. https://mirandayardley.com/en/a-history-of-autogynephilia/.
Funding
Conru Foundation (Sample 4).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interests or competing interests to declare.
Ethical Approval
The authors certify that the research complies with ethical standards and was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Northwestern University (Samples 1–3, 5–10) and Pennsylvania State University (Sample 4).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original version of this article was revised: The Supplementary file published for this article required some modification and has been replaced since the article’s original publication.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bailey, J.M., Hsu, K.J. How Autogynephilic Are Natal Females?. Arch Sex Behav 51, 3311–3318 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02359-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02359-8