fix(package): update schema-utils v0.4.3...0.4.5 (dependencies)
#308
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
michael-ciniawsky
changed the title
schema-utils v0.4.3...0.4.5 (dependencies)
Member
|
Released in |
Contributor
Author
|
Awesome thanks! 👌 |
This was referenced Mar 9, 2018
ghost
mentioned this pull request
This was referenced Oct 4, 2019
This was referenced Nov 7, 2019
This was referenced Feb 23, 2020
This was referenced Apr 1, 2020
This was referenced Apr 23, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Dependency update
Did you add tests for your changes?
No, not necessary.
If relevant, did you update the README?
No, not necessary.
Summary
This PR fixes warnings with Webpack 4:
warning "style-loader > [email protected]" has incorrect peer dependency "webpack@^2.0.0 || ^3.0.0".Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No.
Other information
Nothing.