Hi @maryjom,

Thanks for finding where they should go to, but I'm struggling to locate where they are linked from. Doing a search in the codebase for those doesn't seem to work, so I'm not sure where they link from.

@alastc

• accessibility supported link is in this file: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/blob/main/guidelines/terms/20/accessibility-supported.html
• conforming alternate version link is in this file: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/blob/main/guidelines/terms/20/conforming-alternate-version.html
• relative luminance broken link is in this file: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/blob/main/guidelines/terms/20/relative-luminance.html
• Text alternative link is in this file: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/blob/main/guidelines/terms/20/text-alternative.html

Seems that if only link targets change and none of the normative text changes, that the definition file is kept in the directory of the version of WCAG that introduced the term.

This is still a problem. Since WCAG2ICT is embedding the Understanding Intent and WCAG 2 source code for definitions, there are still a few links in these files that are either going to WCAG 2.1 or broken. On today's WCAG2ICT call, @bruce-usab mentioned this and opened WCAG2ICT Issue 294. I have a PR for the one issue that was in the WCAG2ICT source, but the rest are in WCAG's source code.