Skip to content

Example #2 of F22 seems to stretch SC 3.2.5 requirement #114

Closed
@spanchang

Description

Hello WG,
About example #2 in F22 links in new window:
This supposedly suggests that failing to indicate that a link opens a new window is a SC 3.2.5 AAA failure.
The normative SC 3.2.5 says: 'changes are initiated only by user request '. This really does not require clarification, yet the understanding doc explains this to remove doubts one may have when it says: Clicking on a link is an example of an action that is "initiated only by user request."
Surely, when one fixes an SC 3.2.5 issue caused by a popup that opens unexpectedly by replacing it with a link that opens a new window (H83), it is good practice to clarify the behavior with advisory text 'opens new window'.
User agents for a long time have been giving an audio cue when a new window is opened.
So basing a decision that links opening in a new window require notification based on an example in a failure technique when surrounding explanation / other examples do not support this tantamounts to stretching the normative requirements.
Please can you delete example #2 or clarify that failing to indicate that a link opens a new window is not an SC 3.2.5 failure per se? If it is really a failure the understanding doc needs to document that clearly too.
Thanks,
Sailesh Panchang

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions