Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possible typo #129

Open
xfq opened this issue Oct 15, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Possible typo #129

xfq opened this issue Oct 15, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@xfq
Copy link
Member

xfq commented Oct 15, 2022

https://www.w3.org/International/elreq/#how_developed

Academic experts with a focus on Ge’ez manuscripts and philogy.

"philogy" should probably be "philology" here?

@dyacob
Copy link
Member

dyacob commented Oct 17, 2022

Agree, and thanks for pointing this out @xfq. While fixing this typo I addressed a number of others that a spellchecker illuminated, and have committed the corrections.

One thing I notice now in the document is the use of "Sebatbeit" which was the Unicode term in use since v4.1 (2004). The current, more inclusive preferred term, would be "Gurage" which Unicode v14 uses (2021). So an update to replace "Sebatbeit" with "Gurage" would be advised. @r12a , if you concur I am happy to proceed.

Note: I initially committed and pushed with a message that referenced the wrong issue number, I corrected with "git --amend". When pushing after amend, less than a minute later, git told me that my local branch was now behind the remote. So I had to pull and merge to then make the push. This may look odd in the commit history, it doesn't appear that the merge touched any files.

@r12a
Copy link
Contributor

r12a commented Oct 24, 2022

One thing I notice now in the document is the use of "Sebatbeit" which was the Unicode term in use since v4.1 (2004). The current, more inclusive preferred term, would be "Gurage" which Unicode v14 uses (2021). So an update to replace "Sebatbeit" with "Gurage" would be advised. @r12a , if you concur I am happy to proceed.

@dyacob I'm happy for you to make that change. Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants