You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the Computed Values section, the theme of Example 11 is “Computing a relative value generally absolutizes it”. The example then ends with the sentence “See examples (f), (g) and (h) in the table below.”
However, only example (f) is an example of this theme. Why does Example 11 mention examples (g) and (h) when nothing happens to their values between the Specified value and Computed value steps? These two examples are examples for what is mentioned in the subsequent Used Values section, where it says that some values are absolutized late because knowledge about the layout is needed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
simevidas
changed the title
[css-cascade]
[css-cascade] Instruction in example 11 is confusing
Jul 10, 2023
Spec link: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-cascade/#computed
In the Computed Values section, the theme of Example 11 is “Computing a relative value generally absolutizes it”. The example then ends with the sentence “See examples (f), (g) and (h) in the table below.”
However, only example (f) is an example of this theme. Why does Example 11 mention examples (g) and (h) when nothing happens to their values between the Specified value and Computed value steps? These two examples are examples for what is mentioned in the subsequent Used Values section, where it says that some values are absolutized late because knowledge about the layout is needed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: