We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The section on unforced breaks currently has the text:
If even that does not lead to sufficient break points, cloned margins/border/padding at the block-end side are truncated; and if more room is still needed, cloned margins/border/padding are truncated at the block-end side as well.
The "if more room is needed" clause is saying the same thing as the previous clause, which doesn't make sense.
I suspect it probably intended to say block-start rather than block-end side for the "if more room is needed" behavior at the end of the sentence.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, you're right. Relevant WG resolution at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0279.html
Sorry, something went wrong.
0e8f82d
No branches or pull requests
The section on unforced breaks currently has the text:
The "if more room is needed" clause is saying the same thing as the previous clause, which doesn't make sense.
I suspect it probably intended to say block-start rather than block-end side for the "if more room is needed" behavior at the end of the sentence.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: