Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Glyphs for characters in other blocks incorrectly falling back to system font #19

Open
r12a opened this issue Feb 15, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
doc:adlm doc:nkoo gap The first comment in this issue is read by the gap-analysis document. i:fonts Fonts & font styles l:ff Pular (Adlam) l:nqo N'Ko script & language p:advanced The gap-analysis priority is Advanced. s:nkoo x:adlm x:blink x:gecko x:nkoo

Comments

@r12a
Copy link
Contributor

r12a commented Feb 15, 2021

This issue is applicable to Adlam and N'Ko.

When text contains a punctuation mark such as an Arabic question mark, the glyph displayed should be that contained in the Adlam or N'Ko font, if it contains one.

The Gap:

At least one browser on desktop and mobile render the Arabic question mark (and perhaps other punctuation) using a fallback font despite the font containing the appropriate glyph.

Example in N'Ko:

Incorrect question mark glyph

This was tested with the Noto Sans NKo font. In Gecko and Blink the question mark falls back to a different font.

It may be related to a script itemization issue where Adlam or N'Ko is not properly recognized. A request was made to the Unicode Consortium to fix the Script Extensions table.

Other characters from the Arabic and Devanagari script blocks exhibit the same behaviour. For example, a danda used in Limbu, or a tatweel used in Syriac.

More:

Tests & results:

Action taken:

Gecko

Outcomes

The Unicode Consortium has fixed the script extensions table.

Gecko is implementing a fix.

Priority:

A question mark is visible, just not in the correct font. So marking as advanced.

@r12a r12a added doc:adlm gap The first comment in this issue is read by the gap-analysis document. p:advanced The gap-analysis priority is Advanced. i:fonts Fonts & font styles doc:nkoo labels Feb 15, 2021
@r12a
Copy link
Contributor Author

r12a commented Feb 15, 2021

The first comment in this issue contains text that will automatically appear in one or more gap-analysis documents as a subsection with the same title as this issue. Any edits made to that comment will be immediately available in the document. Proposals for changes or discussion of the content can be made in comments below this point.

Relevant gap analysis documents include:
AdlamN'Ko

@xfq
Copy link
Member

xfq commented Apr 25, 2021

The Unicode properties & algorithms group proposed an update to Script_Extensions to include Adlam and N'ko to the appropriate Arabic punctuation marks, and it will be discussed in UTC.

See PRI428g in https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2021/21069-utc167-properties-recs.pdf

@r12a r12a changed the title Arabic question mark incorrectly falls back to system font Glyphs for characters in other blocks incorrectly falling back to system font Jun 13, 2023
@r12a r12a added l:ff Pular (Adlam) s:nkoo l:nqo N'Ko script & language labels May 3, 2024
@r12a r12a moved this to Spec ready, pending bug report in Gap-analysis pipeline Jun 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc:adlm doc:nkoo gap The first comment in this issue is read by the gap-analysis document. i:fonts Fonts & font styles l:ff Pular (Adlam) l:nqo N'Ko script & language p:advanced The gap-analysis priority is Advanced. s:nkoo x:adlm x:blink x:gecko x:nkoo
Projects
Status: Spec ready, pending bug report
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants