Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Investigate JEP 395: Records #22297

Open
tgodzik opened this issue Jan 2, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Investigate JEP 395: Records #22297

tgodzik opened this issue Jan 2, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
area:jdk Issues tied to artifacts published under a particular jdk compat:java:jep:stable Issues corresponding to a JEP which got already delivered as a stable feature in a JDK release compat:java:jep Issues corresponding to a JEP (JDK Enhancement Proposal) itype:enhancement

Comments

@tgodzik
Copy link
Contributor

tgodzik commented Jan 2, 2025 •
edited
Loading

JEP 395 introduced record classes which in concept are similar to case classes. Since we are planning to update to a newer JDK at an unspecified future I hope we can figure out if this is in any way useful to use for example for some bytecode optimization similar to #22249

And if we can actually use them or whether it will be impossible for us. This might be binary incompatible, but it would be good to see if maybe we can use this to our advantage in some way without sacrificing binary compatibility

Introduced in JDK 16

Related to #20561
@tgodzik tgodzik added area:jdk Issues tied to artifacts published under a particular jdk compat:java:jep Issues corresponding to a JEP (JDK Enhancement Proposal) compat:java:jep:stable Issues corresponding to a JEP which got already delivered as a stable feature in a JDK release labels Jan 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area:jdk Issues tied to artifacts published under a particular jdk compat:java:jep:stable Issues corresponding to a JEP which got already delivered as a stable feature in a JDK release compat:java:jep Issues corresponding to a JEP (JDK Enhancement Proposal) itype:enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@tgodzik @Gedochao