Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't serialize dataset with CAGRA bench #1781

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2023

Conversation

benfred
Copy link
Member

@benfred benfred commented Aug 27, 2023

As an alternative to #1743, this uses the include_dataset=False param in cagra::serialize to avoid writing the dataset to disk with the index. This lets us avoid writing a second copy of the dataset, since it is available in a separate file already

As an alternative to rapidsai#1743, this uses the `include_dataset=False` param
in cagra::serialize to avoid writing the dataset to disk with the index.
This lets us avoid writing a second copy of the dataset, since it is
available in a separate file already
@benfred benfred requested a review from a team as a code owner August 27, 2023 18:42
@github-actions github-actions bot added the cpp label Aug 27, 2023
@benfred benfred added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Aug 27, 2023
Copy link
Member

@cjnolet cjnolet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I think this is a clean and maintainable solution that continues integrating the bench-Ann code with the rest of RAFT. Definitely prefer this approach.

@cjnolet
Copy link
Member

cjnolet commented Aug 28, 2023

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 8bffb76 into rapidsai:branch-23.10 Aug 28, 2023
54 checks passed
@benfred benfred deleted the cagra_bench_no_dataset branch August 28, 2023 18:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cpp improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants