Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove usage of Dask's get_worker #1365

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 22, 2023

Conversation

pentschev
Copy link
Member

In dask/distributed#7580 get_worker was modified to return the worker of a task, thus it cannot be used by client.run, and we must now use dask_worker as the first argument to client.run to obtain the worker.

In dask/distributed#7580 get_worker was modified to return the worker of
a task, thus it cannot be used by client.run, and we must now use
dask_worker as the first argument to client.run to obtain the worker.
@cjnolet cjnolet added bug Something isn't working non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Mar 22, 2023
@pentschev pentschev requested a review from a team as a code owner March 22, 2023 17:47
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ci label Mar 22, 2023
Copy link
Member

@ajschmidt8 ajschmidt8 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving ops-codeowner file changes

@cjnolet
Copy link
Member

cjnolet commented Mar 22, 2023

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit a7e619c into rapidsai:branch-23.04 Mar 22, 2023
@cjnolet cjnolet mentioned this pull request Mar 23, 2023
@pentschev pentschev deleted the update-get_worker-usage branch May 13, 2024 17:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working ci non-breaking Non-breaking change python
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants