🚨 THIS REPO IS AN EARLY WIP -- DO NOT USE ... yet 🚨
Polyfill of future proposal to the nodejs/tooling repo for util.parseArgs()
This package was implemented using tape as its test harness.
- 🚀 Getting Started
- 🙌 Contributing
- 💡
process.mainArgs
Proposal - 💡
util.parseArgs(argv)
Proposal - 📃 Examples
-
Install dependencies.
npm install
-
Open the index.js file and start editing!
-
Test your code by calling parseArgs through our test file
npm test
Any person who wants to contribute to the initiative is welcome! Please first read the Contributing Guide
Additionally, reading the Examples w/ Output
section of this document will be the best way to familiarize yourself with the target expected behavior for parseArgs() once it is fully implemented.
Note: This can be moved forward independently of the
util.parseArgs()
proposal/work.
process.mainArgs = process.argv.slice(process._exec ? 1 : 2)
argv
{string[]} (Optional) Array of argument strings; defaults toprocess.mainArgs
options
{Object} (Optional) Theoptions
parameter is an object supporting the following properties:withValue
{string[]} (Optional) AnArray
of argument strings which expect a value to be defined inargv
(see [Options][] for details)multiples
{string[]} (Optional) AnArray
of argument strings which, when appearing multiple times inargv
, will be concatenated into anArray
short
{Object} (Optional) AnObject
of key, value pairs of strings which map a "short" alias to an argument; When appearing multiples times inargv
; RespectswithValue
&multiples
strict
{Boolean} (Optional) ABoolean
on wheather or not to throw an error when unknown args are encountered
- Returns: {Object} An object having properties:
flags
{Object}, having properties andBoolean
values corresponding to parsed options passedvalues
{Object}, have properties andString
values corresponding to parsed options passedpositionals
{string[]}, containing [Positionals][]
const { parseArgs } = require('@pkgjs/parseargs');
// unconfigured
const { parseArgs } = require('@pkgjs/parseargs');
const argv = ['-f', '--foo=a', '--bar', 'b'];
const options = {};
const { flags, values, positionals } = parseArgs(argv, options);
// flags = { f: true, bar: true }
// values = { foo: 'a' }
// positionals = ['b']
const { parseArgs } = require('@pkgjs/parseargs');
// withValue
const argv = ['-f', '--foo=a', '--bar', 'b'];
const options = {
withValue: ['bar']
};
const { flags, values, positionals } = parseArgs(argv, options);
// flags = { f: true }
// values = { foo: 'a', bar: 'b' }
// positionals = []
const { parseArgs } = require('@pkgjs/parseargs');
// withValue & multiples
const argv = ['-f', '--foo=a', '--foo', 'b'];
const options = {
withValue: ['foo'],
multiples: ['foo']
};
const { flags, values, positionals } = parseArgs(argv, options);
// flags = { f: true }
// values = { foo: ['a', 'b'] }
// positionals = []
const { parseArgs } = require('@pkgjs/parseargs');
// shorts
const argv = ['-f', 'b'];
const options = {
short: { f: 'foo' }
};
const { flags, values, positionals } = parseArgs(argv, options);
// flags = { foo: true }
// values = {}
// positionals = ['b']
- Is
cmd --foo=bar baz
the same ascmd baz --foo=bar
?- yes
- Does the parser execute a function?
- no
- Does the parser execute one of several functions, depending on input?
- no
- Can subcommands take options that are distinct from the main command?
- no
- Does it output generated help when no options match?
- no
- Does it generated short usage? Like:
usage: ls [-ABCFGHLOPRSTUWabcdefghiklmnopqrstuwx1] [file ...]
- no (no usage/help at all)
- Does the user provide the long usage text? For each option? For the whole command?
- no
- Do subcommands (if implemented) have their own usage output?
- no
- Does usage print if the user runs
cmd --help
?- no
- Does it set
process.exitCode
?- no
- Does usage print to stderr or stdout?
- N/A
- Does it check types? (Say, specify that an option is a boolean, number, etc.)
- no
- Can an option have more than one type? (string or false, for example)
- no
- Can the user define a type? (Say,
type: path
to callpath.resolve()
on the argument.)- no
- Does a
--foo=0o22
mean 0, 22, 18, or "0o22"?"0o22"
- Does it coerce types?
- no
- Does
--no-foo
coerce to--foo=false
? For all flags? Only boolean flags?- no, it sets
{args:{'no-foo': true}}
- no, it sets
- Is
--foo
the same as--foo=true
? Only for known booleans? Only at the end?- no,
--foo
is the same as--foo=
- no,
- Does it read environment variables? Ie, is
FOO=1 cmd
the same ascmd --foo=1
?- no
- Do unknown arguments raise an error? Are they parsed? Are they treated as positional arguments?
- no, they are parsed, not treated as positionals
- Does
--
signal the end of flags/options?- open question
- If
--
signals the end, is--
included as a positional? isprogram -- foo
the same asprogram foo
? Are both{positionals:['foo']}
, or is the first one{positionals:['--', 'foo']}
?
- Does the API specify whether a
--
was present/relevant?- no
- Is
-bar
the same as--bar
?- no,
-bar
is a short option or options, with expansion logic that follows the Utility Syntax Guidelines in POSIX.1-2017.-bar
expands to-b
,-a
,-r
.
- no,
- Is
---foo
the same as--foo
?- no
- the first flag would be parsed as
'-foo'
- the second flag would be parsed as
'foo'
- Is
-
a positional? ie,bash some-test.sh | tap -
- yes