-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Positioning of children nodes further down #302
Comments
You can try using a compaction strategy. |
ty for the response! it does work to a certain extent to what I was expecting, It could be part of the elk's algorithm but as I added more nodes in this example, node If i add edgerouting POLYLINE, it is similar to what I need, but the compaction strategy does not work with edge routing is this correct? |
Here is another good example of |
If this is the case, I suggest introducing hierarchy to achieve this (and make the hierarchical node invisible). |
i see, seems like sub flow is the only way to achieve this, i would need to apply child to a child for every node. Not sure if I want to go that route. Thanks for the help! |
Is there some property I need to apply that positions a child 2 levels down to be closer to the parent if the 1st level has a node with an insanely large height? (this applies to any children on any level)
For Example: Elk JSON
I was able to use
alignment: 'TOP'
to have the 1st child node on the right positioned at the top, but my goal is to have the 2 left and right subtrees be independent of one another so that the 2nd child on the right will be positioned closer and not on the 3rd layer (below the maximum height node from 2nd layer)I am trying to prevent having to create a subgroup per new child.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: