Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

https: fix agent servername option #1110

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

https: fix agent servername option #1110

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

skenqbx
Copy link
Contributor

@skenqbx skenqbx commented Mar 9, 2015

See #1106 for original issue.

As requested; the test first.

This PR also need to be ported to node v0.12 & v0.10

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, is this actually https only though?

cc @indutny

@skenqbx
Copy link
Contributor Author

skenqbx commented Mar 10, 2015

@Fishrock123 The servername option relates to SNI, which is a https(tls) feature.

@indutny
Copy link
Member

indutny commented Mar 10, 2015

Will look into it later, please don't land yet ;) (later = 10-12 hours)

On Tuesday, March 10, 2015, Malte-Thorben Bruns [email protected]
wrote:

@Fishrock123 https://github.com/Fishrock123 The servername option
relates to SNI, which is a https(tls) feature.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1110 (comment).

@indutny
Copy link
Member

indutny commented Mar 11, 2015

Took 16 hours, but finally looking into it.

@indutny
Copy link
Member

indutny commented Mar 11, 2015

I'm not sure what kind of semver tag should it have... Seems to be a bugfix, but is a behaviour change too. cc @Fishrock123 @rvagg ?

indutny pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2015
PR-URL: #1110
Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]>
@indutny
Copy link
Member

indutny commented Mar 11, 2015

Landed in 8453fbc, thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants