Based on the script run_qa.py
.
Note: This script only works with models that have a fast tokenizer (backed by the 🤗 Tokenizers library) as it uses special features of those tokenizers. You can check if your favorite model has a fast tokenizer in this table, if it doesn't you can still use the old version of the script.
The old version of this script can be found here.
This example code fine-tunes BERT on the SQuAD1.0 dataset. It runs in 24 min (with BERT-base) or 68 min (with BERT-large) on a single tesla V100 16GB.
python run_qa.py \
--model_name_or_path bert-base-uncased \
--dataset_name squad \
--do_train \
--do_eval \
--per_device_train_batch_size 12 \
--learning_rate 3e-5 \
--num_train_epochs 2 \
--max_seq_length 384 \
--doc_stride 128 \
--output_dir /tmp/debug_squad/
Training with the previously defined hyper-parameters yields the following results:
f1 = 88.52
exact_match = 81.22
Here is an example using distributed training on 8 V100 GPUs and Bert Whole Word Masking uncased model to reach a F1 > 93 on SQuAD1.1:
python -m torch.distributed.launch --nproc_per_node=8 ./examples/question-answering/run_squad.py \
--model_name_or_path bert-large-uncased-whole-word-masking \
--dataset_name squad \
--do_train \
--do_eval \
--learning_rate 3e-5 \
--num_train_epochs 2 \
--max_seq_length 384 \
--doc_stride 128 \
--output_dir ./examples/models/wwm_uncased_finetuned_squad/ \
--per_device_eval_batch_size=3 \
--per_device_train_batch_size=3 \
Training with the previously defined hyper-parameters yields the following results:
f1 = 93.15
exact_match = 86.91
This fine-tuned model is available as a checkpoint under the reference
bert-large-uncased-whole-word-masking-finetuned-squad
.
This example code fine-tunes XLNet on both SQuAD1.0 and SQuAD2.0 dataset.
python run_qa_beam_search.py \
--model_name_or_path xlnet-large-cased \
--dataset_name squad \
--do_train \
--do_eval \
--learning_rate 3e-5 \
--num_train_epochs 2 \
--max_seq_length 384 \
--doc_stride 128 \
--output_dir ./wwm_cased_finetuned_squad/ \
--per_device_eval_batch_size=4 \
--per_device_train_batch_size=4 \
--save_steps 5000
export SQUAD_DIR=/path/to/SQUAD
python run_qa_beam_search.py \
--model_name_or_path xlnet-large-cased \
--dataset_name squad_v2 \
--do_train \
--do_eval \
--version_2_with_negative \
--learning_rate 3e-5 \
--num_train_epochs 4 \
--max_seq_length 384 \
--doc_stride 128 \
--output_dir ./wwm_cased_finetuned_squad/ \
--per_device_eval_batch_size=2 \
--per_device_train_batch_size=2 \
--save_steps 5000
Larger batch size may improve the performance while costing more memory.
{
"exact": 85.45884578997162,
"f1": 92.5974600601065,
"total": 10570,
"HasAns_exact": 85.45884578997162,
"HasAns_f1": 92.59746006010651,
"HasAns_total": 10570
}
{
"exact": 80.4177545691906,
"f1": 84.07154997729623,
"total": 11873,
"HasAns_exact": 76.73751686909581,
"HasAns_f1": 84.05558584352873,
"HasAns_total": 5928,
"NoAns_exact": 84.0874684608915,
"NoAns_f1": 84.0874684608915,
"NoAns_total": 5945
}
The following examples show how to fine-tune BERT models with different relative position embeddings. The BERT model
bert-base-uncased
was pretrained with default absolute position embeddings. We provide the following pretrained
models which were pre-trained on the same training data (BooksCorpus and English Wikipedia) as in the BERT model
training, but with different relative position embeddings.
zhiheng-huang/bert-base-uncased-embedding-relative-key
, trained from scratch with relative embedding proposed by Shaw et al., Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationszhiheng-huang/bert-base-uncased-embedding-relative-key-query
, trained from scratch with relative embedding method 4 in Huang et al. Improve Transformer Models with Better Relative Position Embeddingszhiheng-huang/bert-large-uncased-whole-word-masking-embedding-relative-key-query
, fine-tuned from modelbert-large-uncased-whole-word-masking
with 3 additional epochs with relative embedding method 4 in Huang et al. Improve Transformer Models with Better Relative Position Embeddings
export CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7
python -m torch.distributed.launch --nproc_per_node=8 ./examples/question-answering/run_squad.py \
--model_name_or_path zhiheng-huang/bert-base-uncased-embedding-relative-key-query \
--dataset_name squad \
--do_train \
--do_eval \
--learning_rate 3e-5 \
--num_train_epochs 2 \
--max_seq_length 512 \
--doc_stride 128 \
--output_dir relative_squad \
--per_device_eval_batch_size=60 \
--per_device_train_batch_size=6
Training with the above command leads to the following results. It boosts the BERT default from f1 score of 88.52 to 90.54.
'exact': 83.6802270577105, 'f1': 90.54772098174814
The change of max_seq_length
from 512 to 384 in the above command leads to the f1 score of 90.34. Replacing the above
model zhiheng-huang/bert-base-uncased-embedding-relative-key-query
with
zhiheng-huang/bert-base-uncased-embedding-relative-key
leads to the f1 score of 89.51. The changing of 8 gpus to one
gpu training leads to the f1 score of 90.71.
export CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7
python -m torch.distributed.launch --nproc_per_node=8 ./examples/question-answering/run_squad.py \
--model_name_or_path zhiheng-huang/bert-large-uncased-whole-word-masking-embedding-relative-key-query \
--dataset_name squad \
--do_train \
--do_eval \
--learning_rate 3e-5 \
--num_train_epochs 2 \
--max_seq_length 512 \
--doc_stride 128 \
--output_dir relative_squad \
--per_gpu_eval_batch_size=6 \
--per_gpu_train_batch_size=2 \
--gradient_accumulation_steps 3
Training with the above command leads to the f1 score of 93.52, which is slightly better than the f1 score of 93.15 for
bert-large-uncased-whole-word-masking
.
python run_tf_squad.py \
--model_name_or_path bert-base-uncased \
--output_dir model \
--max_seq_length 384 \
--num_train_epochs 2 \
--per_gpu_train_batch_size 8 \
--per_gpu_eval_batch_size 16 \
--do_train \
--logging_dir logs \
--logging_steps 10 \
--learning_rate 3e-5 \
--doc_stride 128
For the moment evaluation is not available in the Tensorflow Trainer only the training.