Skip to content

Conversation

@Linchin
Copy link
Contributor

@Linchin Linchin commented Jun 4, 2024

This gives users the option to not use the Storage client if they prefer the REST client.

Fixes #1920 🦕

@Linchin Linchin requested review from a team as code owners June 4, 2024 23:23
@Linchin Linchin requested a review from shollyman June 4, 2024 23:23
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: m Pull request size is medium. api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/python-bigquery API. labels Jun 4, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@chalmerlowe chalmerlowe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

QUESTION: Would we consider this a breaking change since we are moving to having a default setting of True instead of False which is what I feel like the current setting is.

I am approving this, pending an answer to the above question.
Would be happy to get in a chat OR a meeting to discuss, as need. be.

@Linchin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Linchin commented Jun 10, 2024

QUESTION: Would we consider this a breaking change since we are moving to having a default setting of True instead of False which is what I feel like the current setting is.

I am approving this, pending an answer to the above question. Would be happy to get in a chat OR a meeting to discuss, as need. be.

Thanks for the question! The default behavior in the past is True. As in #1920, the customer couldn't disable the storage client unless they uninstall the package altogether.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/python-bigquery API. size: m Pull request size is medium.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow enabling/disabling the storage API on a per-connection basis

2 participants