-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 656
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Option Generalizable All Variables
documentation is incomplete
#6030
Comments
The option is documented but is missing an index. See https://coq.inria.fr/distrib/current/refman/gallina-ext.html#hevea_command71. I don't know what |
FTR, it's not displayed by |
Is there any way to dump all the "option-like" state in Coq? The fact that this is not printed meant it took me really long to even figure out why the same code behaves different in one file vs. another. |
That documentation is incomplete then, it fails to mention the effect on |
Should I open a separate bug asking for a way to have generalization in |
Given how weird the effect on |
Generalizable All Variables
is not documented and not printedGeneralizable All Variables
is not documented
I moved separating the two effects to a new issue #6888. This is now just about the lack of documentation. |
Generalizable All Variables
is not documentedGeneralizable All Variables
documentation is incomplete
Note that this isn't specific to generalizable all variables (see this example) - it's just that implicit generalization in instances does not require any syntax, which is indeed surprising and I agree that it should at least be possible to disable the instance generalization, even if that remains the default. |
I'm taking the liberty of closing this issue because it seems fixed. Feel free to reopen this, or open a new issue with an up-to-date description of what should happen now. Rationale:
|
Version
8.7.dev
Operating system
Linux
Description of the problem
I just learned (by reading std++ source code) that Coq has an option
Generalizable All Variables
. However, that option is not documented at https://coq.inria.fr/refman/option-index.html.EDIT: Moved separation the two effects to #6888.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: