Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(data-point): replace util.inspect with json-stringify-safe #347

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 1, 2019

Conversation

acatl
Copy link
Collaborator

@acatl acatl commented May 1, 2019

What:

this change is to remove inconsistencies across node versions

Why:

see #346

Unblocks issue #344 and its PR #345

How:

using json-stringify-safe as a drop-in replacement

Checklist:

  • Has Breaking changes N/A
  • Documentation N/A
  • Tests
  • Ready to be merged
  • Added username to all-contributors list N/A

this change is to remove inconsistencies across node versions

close ViacomInc#346
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 1, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #347 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #347   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files         139    139           
  Lines        1997   1998    +1     
  Branches      181    181           
=====================================
+ Hits         1997   1998    +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ity-types/validate-modifiers/validate-modifiers.js 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
packages/data-point/lib/utils/index.js 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 35b18cc...1b58fac. Read the comment docs.

@acatl acatl merged commit e112c99 into ViacomInc:master May 1, 2019
@acatl acatl deleted the 346-replace-uti-inspect branch May 1, 2019 19:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants