We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In MultKAN forward():
1- postacts = postacts_numerical + postacts_symbolic
postacts = postacts_numerical + postacts_symbolic
2- output_range = torch.std(postacts, dim=0) # for visualization, include the contribution from both spline + symbolic
output_range = torch.std(postacts, dim=0)
3- self.edge_actscale.append(output_range)
self.edge_actscale.append(output_range)
In MultKAN reg():
elif reg_metric == 'edge_forward_spline_u':
`acts_scale = self.edge_actscale`
so "'edge_forward_spline_u`: the “norm” of edge, unnormalized (output std), only consider the spline (ignoring symbolic)" is wrong?
to correct in forward(): self.edge_actscale.append(output_range_spline)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
In MultKAN forward():
1-
postacts = postacts_numerical + postacts_symbolic
2-
output_range = torch.std(postacts, dim=0)
# for visualization, include the contribution from both spline + symbolic3-
self.edge_actscale.append(output_range)
In MultKAN reg():
elif reg_metric == 'edge_forward_spline_u':
so "'edge_forward_spline_u`: the “norm” of edge, unnormalized (output std), only consider the spline (ignoring symbolic)" is wrong?
to correct in forward():
self.edge_actscale.append(output_range_spline)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: