Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Progressive JPEGs start to show on pages faster, from low quality and eventually getting their 100% ... #1338

Open
Fyrd opened this issue May 12, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@Fyrd
Copy link
Owner

Fyrd commented May 12, 2015

Pregressive JPEGs start to show on pages faster, from low quality and eventually getting their 100% quality

Support differs in <img> and background-image. Some support info: http://calendar.perfplanet.com/2012/progressive-jpegs-a-new-best-practice/


This issue was imported from Google Moderator

Moderator votes: +4
Issue added by bonfable on 2014-10-03

@Schweinepriester
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Typo in the title though, should be "progressive" :)

Another link: http://blog.patrickmeenan.com/2013/06/progressive-jpegs-ftw.html

@Fyrd Fyrd changed the title Pregressive JPEGs start to show on pages faster, from low quality and eventually getting their 100% ... Progressive JPEGs start to show on pages faster, from low quality and eventually getting their 100% ... Dec 21, 2015
@tomByrer
Copy link
Contributor

tomByrer commented Jan 9, 2016

+1
Though Safari now renders PJPEG as of 8.x (tested myself on my iOS 8.4.1 iPhone), I'd still like to see what browsers render in background (see OP).

@tuckbick
Copy link

tuckbick commented Feb 3, 2016

+1

1 similar comment
@edent
Copy link

edent commented Sep 13, 2017

+1

@daletom
Copy link

daletom commented Mar 27, 2018

+1 as well, closest think you can see is maybe the wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_layout_engines_%28graphics%29#JPEG_support
pjpg will work in almost every except a few IE browsers (it will still load, just not progressive)

@BenjaminHoegh
Copy link

Suegessted in 2015 and still not added, hope this will be added

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants