Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add column major input support in contractions_nt kernels with new kernel policy for it #188

Merged

Conversation

mdoijade
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@mdoijade mdoijade requested a review from divyegala as a code owner March 30, 2021 16:20
@GPUtester
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

1 similar comment
@GPUtester
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@github-actions github-actions bot added the cpp label Mar 30, 2021
@mdoijade
Copy link
Contributor Author

@teju85 for help with review.

@cjnolet cjnolet added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Apr 1, 2021
Copy link
Member

@teju85 teju85 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes LGTM.

@mdoijade
Copy link
Contributor Author

mdoijade commented Apr 1, 2021

@divyegala please help with review.

Copy link
Member

@divyegala divyegala left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM because @teju85 has approved it. We are working on getting my review being required with ops for merging to work

@teju85
Copy link
Member

teju85 commented Apr 1, 2021

Thank you Divye! I guess since this is Mahesh's first PR to raft, this requires a whitelisting from the admin team? @JohnZed ?

@cjnolet
Copy link
Member

cjnolet commented Apr 1, 2021

rerun tests

@JohnZed
Copy link
Contributor

JohnZed commented Apr 1, 2021

ok to test

@mdoijade
Copy link
Contributor Author

mdoijade commented Apr 5, 2021

@teju85 is this PR now good to merge? Who can merge it?

@teju85
Copy link
Member

teju85 commented Apr 5, 2021

@gpucibot merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit f0cd81f into rapidsai:branch-0.19 Apr 5, 2021
rapids-bot bot pushed a commit to rapidsai/cuml that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2021
…nstead of cutlass (#3691)

This change depends on RAFT pull request - rapidsai/raft#188
-- Adds column major input support in prims_benchmark's Distance bench
-- Removes cutlass from all distance metrics in column major case.
-- Removes cutlass from all the distance metrics test cases.

Authors:
  - Mahesh Doijade (https://github.com/mdoijade)

Approvers:
  - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet)
  - Thejaswi. N. S (https://github.com/teju85)

URL: #3691
vimarsh6739 pushed a commit to vimarsh6739/cuml that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
…nstead of cutlass (rapidsai#3691)

This change depends on RAFT pull request - rapidsai/raft#188
-- Adds column major input support in prims_benchmark's Distance bench
-- Removes cutlass from all distance metrics in column major case.
-- Removes cutlass from all the distance metrics test cases.

Authors:
  - Mahesh Doijade (https://github.com/mdoijade)

Approvers:
  - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet)
  - Thejaswi. N. S (https://github.com/teju85)

URL: rapidsai#3691
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cpp improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants