Skip to content

[Fix] parse: ignore __proto__ keys #428

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
ljharb merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2022
Merged

[Fix] parse: ignore __proto__ keys #428

ljharb merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2022
+61 −1

Conversation

@ljharb
Copy link
Owner

@ljharb ljharb commented Dec 28, 2021

No description provided.

@ljharb ljharb added the parse label Dec 28, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 28, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #428 (8b4cc14) into main (ad63d36) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #428   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.85%   99.85%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines        1408     1423   +15     
  Branches      172      173    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         1406     1421   +15     
  Misses          2        2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
lib/parse.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
test/parse.js 99.79% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ad63d36...8b4cc14. Read the comment docs.

@ljharb ljharb mentioned this pull request Jan 9, 2022
Closed
@ljharb ljharb merged commit 8b4cc14 into main Jan 9, 2022
@ljharb ljharb deleted the dunder-proto branch January 9, 2022 05:16
@ljharb
Copy link
Owner Author

ljharb commented Jan 11, 2022

v6.10.3 has been released with this change. This has also been backported to v6.9.7, v6.8.3, v6.7.3, v6.6.1, v6.5.3, v6.4.1, v6.3.3, and v6.2.4.

ljharb added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2022
@ljharb
[Fix] parse: ignore __proto__ keys (#428)
e799ba5
ljharb added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2022
@ljharb
[Fix] parse: ignore __proto__ keys (#428)
fc36827
ljharb added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2022
@ljharb
[Fix] parse: ignore __proto__ keys (#428)
f945393
ljharb added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2022
@ljharb
[Fix] parse: ignore __proto__ keys (#428)
7320525
ljharb added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2022
@ljharb
[Fix] parse: ignore __proto__ keys (#428)
ed0f5dc
ljharb added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2022
@ljharb
[Fix] parse: ignore __proto__ keys (#428)
727ef5d
ljharb added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2022
@ljharb
[Fix] parse: ignore __proto__ keys (#428)
4310742
ljharb added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2022
@ljharb
[Fix] parse: ignore __proto__ keys (#428)
ba24e74
@cc-prodsec cc-prodsec mentioned this pull request Jun 28, 2022
Closed
@shaneomatz shaneomatz mentioned this pull request Nov 18, 2022
Open
@eleichter-globality eleichter-globality mentioned this pull request Dec 22, 2022
Merged
@TheKingTermux TheKingTermux mentioned this pull request Dec 22, 2022
Closed
4 tasks
@ckalpakoglu ckalpakoglu mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2023
Open
@cx-tatiana-bogoslavsky cx-tatiana-bogoslavsky mentioned this pull request Feb 7, 2023
Open
@dorohayon dorohayon mentioned this pull request Feb 7, 2023
Open
@sync-by-unito sync-by-unito bot mentioned this pull request Feb 17, 2023
Open
This was referenced Mar 7, 2023
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
@saurabh21316 saurabh21316 mentioned this pull request Jun 30, 2023
Closed
@apcxtest apcxtest mentioned this pull request Aug 17, 2023
Closed
@Yoavast Yoavast mentioned this pull request Feb 27, 2023
Closed
@cx-carolyn-yates cx-carolyn-yates mentioned this pull request Jun 23, 2023
Closed
@ljharb ljharb mentioned this pull request Mar 4, 2024
Closed
@adamsousa adamsousa mentioned this pull request May 25, 2024
Open
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2024
Open
@hunorszegediblack hunorszegediblack mentioned this pull request Jul 19, 2024
Open
@kumailr7 kumailr7 mentioned this pull request Jul 23, 2024
Open
@polishCarealKiller polishCarealKiller mentioned this pull request Jul 23, 2024
Open
@miwashi miwashi mentioned this pull request Jul 23, 2024
Open
@wellcathita wellcathita mentioned this pull request Jul 23, 2024
Open
@terrorizer1980 terrorizer1980 mentioned this pull request Jul 26, 2024
Closed
@sumitmishra04 sumitmishra04 mentioned this pull request Jul 27, 2024
Open
@hashim21223445 hashim21223445 mentioned this pull request Jul 28, 2024
Merged
@kumailr7 kumailr7 mentioned this pull request Jul 30, 2024
Open
@polishCarealKiller polishCarealKiller mentioned this pull request Jul 30, 2024
Open
@wellcathita wellcathita mentioned this pull request Jul 30, 2024
Open
@miwashi miwashi mentioned this pull request Jul 30, 2024
Open
@terrorizer1980 terrorizer1980 mentioned this pull request Jul 31, 2024
Closed
This was referenced Sep 12, 2024
Open
Open
@pratheeshrussell-qb pratheeshrussell-qb mentioned this pull request Feb 20, 2025
Closed
@pratheeshrussell-qb pratheeshrussell-qb mentioned this pull request Apr 7, 2025
Closed
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Apr 7, 2025
Open
@deepsource-dev deepsource-dev bot mentioned this pull request May 14, 2025
Open
This was referenced May 26, 2025
Open
Open
Open
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Sep 22, 2025
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

parse

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ljharb