Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sociology
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Sociology and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
![]() | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
![]() | WikiProject Sociology was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 15 January 2014. |
RfCs on autism
[edit]
There's an RfC on whether the current article is consistent with NPOV and a second RfC on whether to keep the current lead or replace it. LogicalLens (talk) 06:04, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Article for deletion - Femosphere
[edit]There is an Article for deletion discussion that may be of interest to some here on a new article, Femosphere. More information about it may be found here. FULBERT (talk) 17:47, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Article on effects of human migration?
[edit]Hi, I've been thinking, right now there isn't any article that if focused on the overall impact of human migration. The main human migration article covers the topic of migration overall, but I think there might be room for expansion on the topic, enough for a separate article. ★Trekker (talk) 12:14, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Special needs + voice talking
[edit]Talking articles for Autism hard of hearing and Down syndrome for learning something new to read + taking notes. 64.83.167.131 (talk) 17:16, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
While reviewing math articles, I tripped over the article Uses of trigonometry which seems to be some kind of original research into the history of trigonometry, or the sociology of it, or some history of engineering, or I don't know what. It's certainly terrible as a math article per se, and I'm not sure what to do with it. It could be PRODed and AfD'ed of course, but perhaps it could be turned into a worthwhile article in epistomology or something like that. I'm posting this note in several other wikiprojects, as I'm not sure what else to do with it. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 05:01, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Input requested on Roseto Effect article
[edit]Hi all — I’ve opened a Request for Comment at Talk:Roseto effect about whether the article’s current framing and sourcing comply with WP:MEDRS and WP:NOTABILITY. The article presents a historically influential case study in social cohesion and cardiovascular health, with modern sourcing to frame its relevance and limitations.
Input from editors familiar with medical or sociological sourcing would be very welcome. Thanks! -- ke4roh (talk) 02:30, 9 May 2025 (UTC)