Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Assessment
|
Home | Talk page | Members | Open tasks | Assessment | Showcase | Tools | Templates | Stub templates | Newsletters |
Food & Drink WikiProject | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Index · Statistics · Log | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Welcome to the assessment department of the Food and drink WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Food and drink related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Food and drink articles by quality and Category:Food and drink articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions
[edit]- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Food and drink WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
- Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Taskforce Quality Statistics
[edit]
Cheeses Taskforce | Desserts Taskforce | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Index · Statistics · Log | Index · Statistics · Log | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Desserts articles by quality statistics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foodservice Taskforce | Herbs and Spices Taskforce | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Index · Statistics · Log | Index · Statistics · Log | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Instructions
[edit]Quality assessments
[edit]An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WPFOOD}} project banner on its talk page: {{WPFOOD|class=???}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Food and drink articles) | FA | |
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Food and drink articles) | A | |
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Food and drink articles) | GA | |
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Food and drink articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Food and drink articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Food and drink articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Food and drink articles) | Stub | |
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Food and drink articles) | FL | |
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Food and drink articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.
Quality scale
[edit]Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Maraba coffee |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of vegetable oils |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Burger King |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Fish |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Vanilla |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | 2000 St. James Place |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Kashi (company) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Abobra |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of fast food restaurants |
Category | Any category falls under this class. | Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. | Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. | Category:Food and Category:Drink |
Disambig | Any disambiguation page falls under this class. | The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. | Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. | BK (disambiguation) |
File | Any page in the file namespace falls under this class. | The page contains an image, a sound clip or other media-related content. | Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited. | |
Portal | Any page in the portal namespace falls under this class. | Portals are intended to serve as "main pages" for specific topics. | Editor involvement is essential to ensure that portals are kept up to date. | Food and Drink |
Project | All WikiProject-related pages fall under this class. | Project pages are intended to aid editors in article development. | Develop these pages into collaborative resources that are useful for improving articles within the project. | This one |
Redirect | Any redirect falls under this class. | The page redirects to another article with a similar name, related topic or that has been merged with the original article at this location. | Editor involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. | Wikipedia:5P |
Template | Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes. | Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. | Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. | {{wpfood}} |
NA | Any non-article page that fits no other classification. | The page contains no article content. | Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified. | Talk:Burger_King/sandbox |
B-Class criteria
[edit]Special emphasis is given to the six criteria that B-Class articles for the WikiProject should meet:
B |
|
Importance assessments
[edit]An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WPFOOD}} project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Food and drink articles) | Top | |
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Food and drink articles) | High | |
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Food and drink articles) | Mid | |
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Food and drink articles) | Low | |
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Food and drink articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Food and drink articles) | ??? |
Importance scale
[edit]The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to culinary students.
Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.
Importance | Criteria | Example |
---|---|---|
Top | Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within their field. | Food, Drink |
High | Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent. | McDonald's |
Mid | Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area. | Grilled cheese sandwich |
Low | Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article. | Monkey bread |
NA | Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. | Category:Foods, Category:Beverages |
Requesting an assessment
[edit]If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
- Athletic Brewing Company - I am working on revising this article and would like a rating as a guide to me as a new wikipedian for what to focus on. MentholFlavoredOreo (talk) 04:09, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Dewakan - First two-Michelin-star restaurant in Malaysia, new article requesting for review. GNKJ95 (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- Food reality television - has been improved with new content and references. It is currently rated a C-class article, but the talk page says it has not yet been checked again B-class criteria. I appreciate your help.
- Nanjing salted duck - This article is not yet rated. I have made significant changes to it, adding a lot of new information, including multiple sections, multiple references, infobox, images, etc. I will continue to add and revise it over the next few weeks and try to make it as best as I can, thank you. KRNEING (talk) 04:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- New Mexico chile - The article has long since been overhauled with far more comprehensive information, new sections, improved flow, and citation and cleanup; currently C-class. My goal is to have this article eventually featured. Thank you! Kehkou (talk) 07:38, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Corporate farming - This article was ranked as start class. I have made significant changes to the whole thing, so a reassessment/input would be much appreciated. Creigpat (talk) 21:02, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Please assess Kiwifruit, it is a high importance piece with a lot of viewership, it should be at least B may need a little help to become A, if you can indicate things to fix to make it A it would be good as well.144.188.128.3 (talk) 00:45, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- American Institute of Wine & Food - A relatively new article, and the topic is often referenced on other pages. It would be great to see it expanded. Hayden.L (talk) 04:19, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Sieving, never assessed Anthere (talk)
- Scialatelli - has recently had a lot of sources added, might be start class now. Also may be rated too high on the importance scale. Ibadibam (talk) 01:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- English breakfast tea - stub template has been removed and sources added. Ibadibam (talk) 00:01, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Cooking with Dog - New article in need of first assessment.Luminum (talk) 22:38, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Broccolini - Have added a few sources & information recently. Currently at start class but should be at C. JoshMuirWikipedia (talk) 13:03, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Mate (beverage) - Has not been rated yet, no ratings for impotance or quality. Rated as B on the Uruguayan WikiProject.Springfan (talk) 17:02, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- Ahi poke -it is currently listed as a stub. Sources, formatting and content have been added. Klosc440 (talk) 15:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Amager Bryghus -is rated as a stub. Sources, and content added. Jesus82 (talk) 16:16, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- Looney's Pub -currently not assessed. Article has many sources but there is room for expansion and review. Thsmi002 (talk) 17:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Toby's Dinner Theatre -currently not assessed. In my opinion, there can be improvements made to the food and drink portion of this page. Thsmi002 (talk) 17:43, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Pecorino di Carmasciano - currently not assessed. Just created. Ergo Sum 05:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- Charu (coffee shop) - currently a stub. I made some improvements. Is it enough for an upgrade to start class? Cheers! Gianvito Scaringi (talk) 13:59, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Lithuanian cuisine - complemented significantly since the January of 2018. Would be nice to get an assesment within WikiProject Food and drink project. -- Ke an (talk) 08:59, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
- Castanea sativa - we (a group of agronomy students) have made substantial changes to the article, and we would like a new assessment of the article. Thanks! Altcropgrup (talk) 16:25, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Junk food (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) High importance, rated C in 2013, has been quite dramatically expanded and improved since then. Tsavage (talk) 04:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Twisties - could this be reassessed when there is time? It has been expanded and citations added. Thank you! SunnyBoi (talk) 14:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- Aero (chocolate bar) - could this please also be reassessed? I have added further information and citations throughout. Thanks so much! SunnyBoi (talk) 14:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- Smoked meat - I have made significant additions to the article. It was rated start class, had little accurate information and was flagged for citations (went from 2 to 43). Please review. Thank You! Perplexed28 (talk) 13:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Mediterranean diet - arguably significant updates since it was assessed. --Signimu (talk) 17:47, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- Weight Watchers (diet) - new article, no rating yet. --Signimu (talk) 20:54, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- Max Headroom has been expanded with many citations and factual corrections (last assessed 2010). Also... should it be part of this project? Already part of Fictional characters, which seems like a more natural fit. BrightVamp (talk) 15:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Cơm tấm has been completed overhauled. I was initially a stub-class with a few uncited paragraph. After this overhaul, it's well structured, tons of new content, and well cited. I strongly believe it deserves a better quality class. Please re-assess it. Thank you! --Koonlew (talk) 21:18, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- White Onion - Currently assessed as a stub, but I have been developing the content in it and feel that it is at least a start or a c-class article. Although a flag for the amount of citations exists, I have significantly increased the content and citations of the work. If possible, I would like this article reassessed. Thank you! --Crosspuzzles12 (talk) 00:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
- Bicol Express has been improved with expanded information, new content and added references. It is currently a stub article but I believe it has been improved to a start or C-class quality. Are you able to reassess it, please? Thank you! --RibbaSky (talk) 01:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
- Cuisine of Quebec is start-class but I put a lot of time into it and I would like it to be re-assessed to reflect what it is now --Safyrr (talk) 18:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
- Colby-Jack I have been working on this page for a while and would like it assessed from a stub to a higher class because I feel it is more than a stub. --Kayy1199 (talk) 00:47, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- Celebrity tomato I have added a substantial amount of information to this stub and would like it to be assessed for a higher rating. Thank you! --Tanny2010 (talk) 08:18, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- Meat and Livestock Australia Hi, I have expanded this article over the past few months and the article has reached a C-class article status. Assessment against the b-class article criteria would be highly appreciated. Thank you! Umbrella.Won (talk) 01:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- Monégasque cuisine Hi, I have expanded this article quite substantially and would like it to be assessed for a higher rating. Thank you! A.ww22 (talk) 07:51, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
- Flourless chocolate cake Hi, I have updated the article regarding Flourless chocolate cake. I added references and citations and would like it to be assessed for a higher rating from stub. Thank you! Sshockley1 (talk) 01:15, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Crushed red pepper I've expanded the crushed red pepper article by adding additional sections and missing citations. I would like this article to be assessed for a higher rating. Thanks! SterlingAC (talk) 01:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Church's Chicken - Please assess. Currently ranked a starter page, but I expanded the page significantly. Heartmusic678 (talk) 18:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hardtack - I have made multiple edits to this page and overhauled the history section to include references to period-accurate documents and literature. This article has had it's requests for additional citations removed and I believe it meets B-Class status, if not GA. Thanks! JRHistorical (talk) 18:19, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Assessment log
[edit]Food and drink articles: Index · Statistics · Log |
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
September 20, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- Hummus with tahini renamed to Hummus.
Reassessed
[edit]Assessed
[edit]- Coffee ice cream (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Crazee Burger (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- DaNico (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Hexagon (restaurant) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Hummus (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as High-Class. (rev · t)
- Japfa (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Nidar (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Sarbhaja (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- The Pine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
September 19, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- Chang-Wang noodles renamed to Changwang noodles.
- Hummus renamed to Hummus with tahini.
- Meso z tiblice renamed to Meso 'z tiblice.
- Draft:Paturi (Bengali dish) renamed to Paturi (Bengali dish).
Reassessed
[edit]- 99 Sushi Bar (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Chupa Chups (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Fish protein powder (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Karađorđeva šnicla (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to GA-Class. (rev · t)
- McDonald's Monopoly (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Mochi donut (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Oudnin el kadhi (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
- Tteok (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- World Coffee Research (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- BestMaid (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Changwang noodles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Choco Mani (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Condiment companies of the United States (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Defunct LGBT drinking establishments in Portland, Oregon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Eisner Food Stores (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Hummus with tahini (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as High-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:LGBTQ drinking establishments in Portland, Oregon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:LGBT drinking establishments in Colorado (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:LGBT pubs in London (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Macaroni Riots (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Meso 'z tiblice (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Midsummer Ox Day (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Más+ (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Perera & Sons (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Phil's Diner (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Spanish cooking television series (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Tommaso Melilli (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- Aporreadillo (talk) removed.
- Chicharrón en salsa (talk) removed.
- Curado (talk) removed.
- Category:Drink companies of Mongolia (talk) removed.
- Draft:Ömer Aybak (talk) removed.
September 17, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- Opson renamed to Opson and sitos.
- Tempo Centar renamed to Mega Maxi.
Reassessed
[edit]- Charlie the Tuna (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Eduardo Santamarina (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- English whisky (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Lucky Stores (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Mexican rice (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Procter & Gamble Philippines (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Draft:Chef "Panini" Pete Blohme (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Insect dishes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Irvins (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Leon Coffee House (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Mega Maxi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Meso z tiblice (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Opson and sitos (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Pakistani vegetable dishes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Wayside Restaurant (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- Category:Insects dishes (talk) removed.
September 16, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- Glucono delta-lactone renamed to Glucono-δ-lactone.
- Herbs de Majorca renamed to Hierbas de Mallorca.
- Hydroxy-alpha-sanshool renamed to Hydroxy-α-sanshool.
- Zeppola renamed to Zeppole.
Reassessed
[edit]- Barmbrack (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Baxters (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Beaver Dam pepper (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Cosmetique Asia Corporation (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- List of Protected Designation of Origin products by country (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to List-Class. (rev · t)
- Niabell (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Pakistani rice dishes (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Tatiana by Kwame Onwuachi (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Chocolate in savory cooking (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Cutty bang (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Glucono-δ-lactone (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Haggen (supermarket) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Hierbas de Mallorca (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Hydroxy-α-sanshool (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- List of Michelin-starred restaurants in Malta (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Pan de Manila (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Stouch Tavern (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Xouba (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Zeppole (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- Draft:Beef Nugget (talk) removed.
- Haggen (talk) removed.
September 15, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- List of Michelin-starred restaurants in Poland renamed to List of Michelin-starred restaurants in Poland.
Reassessed
[edit]- Chocolate pizza (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Hamburger (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Java House (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Vagharelo bhaat (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Cosmetique Asia Corporation (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Defunct LGBT drinking establishments (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Defunct LGBT drinking establishments in New York (state) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Defunct LGBT drinking establishments in New York City (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Defunct LGBT drinking establishments in the United States (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Fish with pickled mustard greens (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Flavor cocoa (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Horse market (Munich) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:LGBT drinking establishments (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:LGBT drinking establishments in Canada (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:LGBT drinking establishments in France (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:LGBT drinking establishments in Mexico (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:LGBT drinking establishments in New York (state) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:LGBT drinking establishments in Oregon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:LGBT drinking establishments in Texas (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:LGBT drinking establishments in Washington (state) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:LGBT pubs in the United Kingdom (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Paturi (Bengali dish) (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Procter & Gamble Philippines (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- R+M Dessert Bar (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in Ballard, Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in Beacon Hill, Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in Belltown, Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in Central District, Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in Central Waterfront, Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in Chinatown–International District, Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in Denny Triangle, Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in Downtown Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in First Hill, Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in Fremont, Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in Missouri by populated place (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in Montlake, Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in Pioneer Square, Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in Queen Anne, Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in Seattle by neighborhood (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in SoDo, Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in South Lake Union, Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in University District, Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in Wallingford, Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Restaurants in West Seattle, Seattle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- Draft:Back 2 Earth (talk) removed.
- Draft:Moonrise Bakery (talk) removed.
September 14, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- In a basket renamed to Basket (food).
- Kolach (cake) renamed to Kolach (pie).
- McDonald's PlayPlace renamed to PlayPlace.
- Postcibalome renamed to Postcibalome.
- Template:User Bacon renamed to Template:User WikiProject Bacon.
Reassessed
[edit]- Charlie the Tuna (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
- English whisky (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Fah-fah (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Karađorđeva šnicla (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to B-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Mahogany Seed Soup (Ofe Akparata) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Pepper pot soup (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Potato fufu (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Seffa (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Category:Australian food and drink organisations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Barbecue in the United States (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Basket (food) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Bataan Rice Enrichment Project (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Brier Hill–style pizza (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Ciorbă de perișoare (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Fadi Kattan (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Hundred Burgers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Indonesian restaurants (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Kolach (pie) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:List of Michelin-starred restaurants in Poland (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Nadiya Hussain (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Nirala Sweets (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- PlayPlace (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Suicide food (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Template:User WikiProject Bacon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- Category:Australian food and drink organizations (talk) removed.
- Draft:Hyatt Regency Cairo West (talk) removed.
- Draft:Hyatt Regency Cairo West (HRCW) (talk) removed.
- Draft:Turtley Corn Mill (talk) removed.