Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SheryOfficial

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

SheryOfficial

SheryOfficial (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SheryOfficial/Archive.

This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.

22 November 2024

[edit]

– A checkuser has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Unblocked self-declared sockpuppet:

39.62.223.58 declared themselves a sock here [1]. Highly abusive, falsely accused me of adding "blatant false information" on many occasions, even when responded to. [2] [3] [4].

Unblocked suspicious entities:

182.191.133.127 did basically the exact same thing as the IP above, just at an earlier time [5].
182.191.75.219 also did the same sort of thing [6] as SheryOffical [7][8][9].
39.62.0.0/16 provided a rather suspiciously large amount of assistance to SheryOffical's previous sockpuppet, [10] Viwivi [11]. Viwivi, just like the unblocked self-declared sockpuppet IP, was obsessed with sectarian and ethnic matters and disputes. [12] Also, check out 39.62.0.0/16's latest edit [13]- it is so advanced and complicated that not even me, a person who has been editing for weeks could pull it off!
Apni_Baat Firstly, this entity is from a location that is very close to where SheryOffical is located. Secondly, they go extreme when it comes to sectarian/ethnic/national matters and disputes- especially when they are Pakistan-related. Lastly, 39.62.0.0/16 was provided suspicious assistance by Apni_Baat [14] [15]- coincidence?

Why Checkuser evidence is needed: Highly WP:DISRUPTIVE network of entities, all unblocked, making false accusations against people, all of which go extreme over highly contested sectarian/ethnic/national matters and disputes. HyperShark244 (talk) 16:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  •  Check declined by a checkuser - From a previous check I don't think Apni Baat is related. Which leaves us without a need to CU here. The only currently interesting accounts/IPs are the range reported. Izno (talk) 17:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]