Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring / content dispute. Multiple editors involved in edit warring. No great surprise given the content. TarnishedPathtalk 10:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article is already ECPed. Do we want to go to 1RR? Daniel Case (talk) 21:04, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see it recently EC move protected. I was going to indef EC as CT/AP. This is always going to be a contentious subject. Am I missing something obvious? BusterD (talk) 22:09, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that this is always going to be a contentious subject. TarnishedPathtalk 00:54, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neostalkedits) 23:01, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There has been a high level of vandalism and negative edits to this page from since the release of a Netflix documentary on the topic of the murder trial. Although I believe that there may be other pages that could use protection in this time, this is a murder victim's page and edits from IP addresses that do not have accounts on Wikipedia -- on either side -- provide risks to its stability at this highly-searched time. PickleG13 (talk) 23:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neostalkedits) 00:45, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last weeks. Xexerss (talk) 03:15, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: persistent edit-warring. Left guide (talk) 03:54, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:56, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not defending the vandals, but it should be under pcp so that new editors that don't vandalize can be given a chance. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 05:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. Article is related to the Arab-Israeli restrictions - and is associated with the Israeli Knesset, a subdivision of that contentious topic. He is also related to Hadash, which is also under ecp. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 05:13, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP Hopper keeps adding commentary to the article without any explanation. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:54, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of sourced DoB, replacement with unsourced DoB. Jfire (talk) 06:14, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- Alex_21 TALK 06:50, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/A-I. Jfire (talk) 06:57, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 07:14, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA. Mellk (talk) 08:08, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The film's Wikipedia page has been subjected to frequent vandalism, including high levels of hate speech and numerous inaccurate edits unrelated to the film. These disruptions compromise the integrity of the page and mislead readers. Given the persistent nature of these issues, I am requesting increased protection to maintain the accuracy and credibility of the information presented. 2603:8000:BF03:BA6C:4070:2185:EBA2:5EFF (talk) 08:32, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring by IPs. Something to do with the coloring system. Borgenland (talk) 10:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous IPs - disruptive editing. Vestrian24Bio 10:48, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:GSRUSUKR; Frequent unsourced or poorly sourced changes by IP editors against local consensus SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 12:02, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:GSRUSUKR; Frequent unsourced or poorly sourced changes by IP editors against local consensus SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 12:03, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by anonymous ip address, mostly from a location in Poland Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 12:30, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs and new IDs have been adding unsourced entries as well as contravening WP:FILMOGRAPHY policy per which films are to be listed only after getting commencement of shooting is confirmed through reliable sources as well as addign unsourced character names[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:37, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A new IP started adding the same unsourced films [23]. One of their proxies/IPs got recently blocked [24]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:10, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:10, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Numerous vandalisms from IP user (not registered) re-arranging tables as per his own way. I suggest 30 days protection --> no edit from unregistered Riktetta (talk) 15:14, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:53, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP editors in violation of MOS:ACCESS. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:30, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP editors in violation of MOS:ACCESS. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:31, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP editors in violation of MOS:ACCESS. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:31, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of unhelpful edits in the last three months, zero constructive edits in the last year (except for the reverts, of course). Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP editors in violation of MOS:ACCESS. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:57, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Tarlby (t) (c) 17:38, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs are continuously removing this person's second surname, even after I moved the relevant source next to the "controversial" material. They have never used an edit summary. I have just realised I am now on 3 reverts, so I am calling for pending changes so this can be on more people's watchlists. I hope this isn't dismissed as a "content dispute", as his full name is literally the title of the source. Unknown Temptation (talk) 17:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:09, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:11, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:11, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:17, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring by IP who is the subject of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Legal threat and most likely a Notatall00 (talk · contribs) and Loveforwiki (talk · contribs) sock who is also the same reason why a similar protection request was filed for 2025 Prayag Maha Kumbh Mela. Borgenland (talk) 19:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:27, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent level of vandalism from IPs -insert valid name here- (talk) 19:40, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP editor repeat-tagging article over something explained on talk page and for which there is already adequate sourcing.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 19:43, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:51, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:55, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:59, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by socks after expiry of protection. Johnj1995 (talk) 19:59, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit wars and repeatedly adding content without citation as well as replacing content already vetted by advanced users with content that is contradictory to the citations. Sn cgh (talk) 21:08, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Several instances of vandalism violating WP:BLP over the past week by unregistered accounts. Requesting semi-protection for 15 days. Northern-Virginia-Photographer (talk) 21:16, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mike Allen 21:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:57, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]