Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterfront (TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:28, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Waterfront (TV series)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non notable "cancelled before airing" TV series that fails WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage from reliable sources that is not routine (ordered by CBS, cancelled by CBS). Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:00, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions.--PATH SLOPU^(Talk) 13:46, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --PATH SLOPU^(Talk) 13:46, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of USA-related deletion discussions. --PATH SLOPU^(Talk) 13:46, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A pity the show never saw the light of day, but as such, practically no focused coverage. The following backstage reference was all I could find to help, and I don't feel that is enough to show WP:GNG has been met. Some of the content might be worth adding to the lead actor's page, as relevant to his career. 66.198.222.67 (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Kristal, November 17, 2006, Actors to CBS: Save Our 'Waterfront', Backstage

Delete. I don't even recall starting that article... Counterfit (talk) 07:13, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – This one's probably getting deleted, but I may ask for a WP:REFUND to draft for this one because while the current article is unsourced, I am quite sure this got more coverage than is indicated at the article. What I'm not sure is if it got enough coverage to merit an article – I'd have to investigate it, but I don't have time to do that right now... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. I'm a fan of vintage TV, as it happens, but Wikipedia is not the place where I'd necessarily look for vintage TV shows. Wikipedia is not about indicriminately listing information. -The Gnome (talk) 12:10, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.