Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calgarypuck
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Calgarypuck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable organization. Cannot find independent third party reliable sources to indicate that this web site passes WP:GNG, I found only passing mentions in a couple news articles, and mentions in blogs which do not establish notability. Flibirigit (talk) 20:50, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Ice hockey, Websites, and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 6 December 2023 (UTC)- del no verifiable notability. - Altenmann >talk 00:01, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: No coverage in independent sources. Ratnahastin (talk) 14:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.