Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cache (Clothing)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cache (Clothing)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company does not seem to meet WP:NCORP for businesses nor WP:GNG. Bringing it here for the community to decide. Netherzone (talk) 17:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls, Business, Fashion, and New York. Netherzone (talk) 17:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There is no widespread substantial coverage on its operations, impact, or history. Its history has the claim of it popularizing high-end fashion in the United States. This, however, was later shown to be a claim made by the company itself. Thus, there is no verified substantial coverage. Maxx-♥ talk and coffee ☕ 14:41, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.