User talk:VFF0347
Please leave messages here. I will respond as appropriate
[edit]I got your message
[edit]I saw your message from earlier and much appreciate your kind words. You may be interested in many of the topics in the of Wikipedia:WikiProject Intertranswiki/Russian/Biography and Wikipedia:WikiProject Intertranswiki/Russian/History lists, since almost all of the listed articles are about WWII, military history, aviation, and Soviet operations. Sadly there is so much from that has yet to be translated to English Wikipedia, ranging from a genocide to the first Uzbek pilot and over 300 other topics.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:06, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
for all your hard work improving military related articles MPS1992 (talk) 00:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for March 31
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sieges of Boulogne (1544–46), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 18 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Vietnamese Laotian War 1479
[edit]Hi- wanted to thank you and compliment the work you did on the Vietnamese-Laotian War 1479 article. The original author had many factual inaccuracies- most of the article actually. You’ve done very well to edit. I had planned on fixing myself but wanted to share some key resources (it is an esoteric subject- but one that does have some significance.) The best resource is by Li Tana “The Ming Factor and the Emergence of the Viet in the 15th Century” additional research by Sun Laichen traces the history of gunpowder and its use during the conflict. Finally, Geoff Wade has made the Chinese chronicles the Ming Shi Lu searchable online in English. You may have to use Lan Xang and Babbai ( the Chinese name for Lanna). Basically, the conflict was a huge and unexpected loss for the Vietnamese- as evident by Chinese reaction. The Le dynasty in Vietnam began a two fold expansion- taking Champa the moving to Laos. It was significant as the Le were an early “gunpowder empire.” The dai viet Ultimately last due to a guerilla war from Lan Xang, a huge deal of support from Lanna, and Chinese armies maneuvering to invade Vietnam. As a result Vietnamese expansion was halted, Lanna rose in prestige, Lan Xang remained independent and strongly allied to Lanna. The most lasting impact came during French colonialism, when the brief conflict aided in the pretext for claiming Lao territory as part of Indochina. Anyway, good work! Hope some of the research helps if still interested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StampyElephant (talk • contribs) 18:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 9
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Great Siege of Scarborough Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scarborough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Barnstar Thank You
[edit]Dear VFF0347. Thank you so much for the barnstar. It is the first one I get. In spite of your remark about the large volume of my contributions, I still feel like a novice and am often wondering about how some things should really be done. I am into Irish history as you certainly have seen. I looked at "your" articles "Laggan army" and "Battle of Glenmaquin". Good work. You seem to be thorough and methodical. I wondered whether I could discuss some technical aspects with you when I am puzzled. With many thanks and friendly greetings, Johannes Schade (talk) 05:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Clones has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Robert McClenon (talk) 01:08, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Siege of Gloucester
[edit]Thanks for your edits converting references on Siege of Gloucester to sfn format, however there are two references to Herbert, N.M., ed. (1988). I think this has caused the article to be added to Category:Harv and Sfn multiple-target errors. I have been looking at trying to fix this but don't know how - any ideas?— Rod talk 09:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Rod! Gee I don't have any idea. I'm a relatively new editor and I have been reviewing all the battles of the English Civil War. If an article is in poor shape, incorrect, or has other issues such a broken links, I try to fix the problem. Did I do something incorrect when I changed the citations? You seem to be a very experienced editor and I would take your suggestions. Please let me know if I need to go back to the Siege of Gloucester and revert my work or make changes. Thanks so much — Virgil VFF0347 (talk) 15:51, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- OK I've yaken another look at Template:Sfn & the section Template:Sfn#More than one work in a year explains to add a & b to the different entries - which I've now done. Might be useful if you get a similar situation in the future. BTW I am not an admin (implied by your edit summary).— Rod talk 15:59, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Rod! I will make a note of the a & b notation for future cases when there are multiple entries for the same author. Sorry that I referred to you as an administrator. You sure have an impressive track record as an editor! Good Day! — Virgil VFF0347 (talk) 16:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- OK I've yaken another look at Template:Sfn & the section Template:Sfn#More than one work in a year explains to add a & b to the different entries - which I've now done. Might be useful if you get a similar situation in the future. BTW I am not an admin (implied by your edit summary).— Rod talk 15:59, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Rod! Gee I don't have any idea. I'm a relatively new editor and I have been reviewing all the battles of the English Civil War. If an article is in poor shape, incorrect, or has other issues such a broken links, I try to fix the problem. Did I do something incorrect when I changed the citations? You seem to be a very experienced editor and I would take your suggestions. Please let me know if I need to go back to the Siege of Gloucester and revert my work or make changes. Thanks so much — Virgil VFF0347 (talk) 15:51, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for February 19
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Athos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of the Dardanelles.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
"Burmese–Siamese War (1767–1774)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Burmese–Siamese War (1767–1774). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 24#Burmese–Siamese War (1767–1774) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Paul_012 (talk) 15:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
"Burmese–Siamese War (1824–1826)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Burmese–Siamese War (1824–1826). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 14#Burmese–Siamese War (1824–1826) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Paul_012 (talk) 14:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Tavoy campaign (1787)
[edit]Hi. Said article was previously renamed following issues you raised at Talk:Tavoy campaign (1787)#I propose to delete this article, but it appears the year was incorrect. Another user has created an article at Burmese–Siamese War (1788), but should it be renamed to Tavoy campaign (1788) instead? You're invited to comment at Talk:Burmese–Siamese War (1788)#Redundancy. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:07, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Dai Viet-Lan Xang War (Vietnamese-Laotion War 1479-1484)
[edit]Hi VFF0347, I've rewritten the article and would appreciate any feedback- you're a reliable and neutral editor. ThanksStampyElephant (talk) 14:02, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)