User talk:Pyramids09

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Zionism

Re this edit, please explain why you removed " and then changed the text to which it refers, and while there is an ongoing RFC dealing with the subject matter? Selfstudier (talk) 10:37, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought consensus was already achieved, sorry. Pyramids09 (talk) 17:28, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it your impression that the ongoing RFC is a consensus for your edit? Selfstudier (talk) 17:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zionism and Discussing changes on talk page

Please explain why you removed the thing that says "discuss changes to this on the talk page" without discussing changes to this on the talk page. The reason we have that comment there is precisely because people keep removing it without discussing the change first. If you'd like to remove it (and make the other changes in the edit), there is an ongoing RfC to discuss it. Thanks. Smallangryplanet (talk) 10:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If someone on the page for Sky says that the sky is neon-green, should we hold a discussion/RFC to decide whether the sky is green, or should someone just change it? You are free to look at my sources, which are also detailed in the many talk page discussions which have been abandoned/bogged down. Pyramids09 (talk) 10:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You did not provide any sources. Maybe it's worth sharing them in the very much still ongoing RfC? Smallangryplanet (talk) 11:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like I did not import my sources properly. Feel free to look at my other revision, where my sources are detailed (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zionism&oldid=1263196513). Cheers. Pyramids09 (talk) 21:24, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pyramids09 that's the edit @Selfstudier was referring to in the previous topic, so I'll repeat their question: Is it your impression that the ongoing RFC is a consensus for your edit? Smallangryplanet (talk) 21:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second time, see the preceding section, a clear case of WP:DISRUPTIVE editing. Selfstudier (talk) 12:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Removing sourced information

Please don't remove sourced information as you did here [1], simply calling it "false claims".

It woukd have been better if you opened a talk page entry to discuss your concerns. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 09:07, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Am doing that right now. Cheers Pyramids09 (talk) 09:09, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accused as a sock puppet

You have been accused of being a sock puppet in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Icewhiz. You should respond to charges on that page. 5.47.169.16 (talk) 11:33, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me. All this attempted censorship is pissing me off. Pyramids09 (talk) 10:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 January 2025

From the editors: Looking back, looking forward

Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2024

In the media: Will you be targeted?

Technology report: New Calculator template brings interactivity at last

Essay: Meet the Canadian who holds the longest editing streak on Wikipedia

Opinion: Reflections one score hence

News and notes: It's a new dawn, it's a new day, it's a new life for me... and I'm feeling free

Serendipity: What we've left behind, and where we want to go next

Op-ed: Elon Musk and the right on Wikipedia

In focus: Twenty years of The Signpost: What did it take?

Arbitration report: Analyzing commonalities of some contentious topics

Humour: How to make friends on Wikipedia

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025: Gaza war

Minor edits

Hi Pyramids09! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Gaza war and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. Minor edit has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 06:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Content removal

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Gaza war, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 06:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 06:57, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will check it out. Thank you for informing me Pyramids09 (talk) 20:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zionism

This is the only time I will warn you. Do anything like Special:Diff/1274236503 against consensus again and you will find yourself the subject of a WP:AE report. TarnishedPath^talk 12:48, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]