User talk:108.6.80.65

March 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Rent (film), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:16, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Claudia Wells has been reverted.
Your edit here to Claudia Wells was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://ethnicelebs.com/claudia-wells) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

May 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Federal Assault Weapons Ban, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Please also be advised that coming to Wikipedia for the purpose of advocating a particular viewpoint is discouraged. While I am assuming the edits were made in good faith, it is very important to remain neutral. Please do not remove large chunks of text you personally deem irrelevant. Blanking content is seldom an appropriate way to edit. Thanks. MaxnaCarter (talk) 03:56, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

It actually is, because the first study refers to a line that clearly wasn't significant enough to appear in the abstract. The JAMA article says specifically: "In the aggregate, stronger gun policies were associated with decreased rates of firearm homicide, even after adjusting for demographic and sociologic factors. Laws that strengthen background checks and permit-to-purchase seemed to decrease firearm homicide rates. Specific laws directed at firearm trafficking, improving child safety, or the banning of military-style assault weapons were not associated with changes in firearm homicide rates. The evidence for laws restricting guns in public places and leniency in gun carrying was mixed." That is literally the opposite of that sentence.

The second edit was because the article cited was about STATE assault weapons bans, which compared to federal (what this article is about) is apples and oranges.108.6.80.65 (talk) 04:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

---