User talk:Junior Jumper

Welcome!

Hello, Junior Jumper, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 15:23, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:1605 Music Therapy Logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1605 Music Therapy Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:48, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter

The Twitter colors have not changed. Corky ^{Buzz by the Hornet's Nest} 06:56, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Naresh Chandra Agrawal.png

A tag has been placed on File:Naresh Chandra Agrawal.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DreamLinker (talk) 18:33, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Gionee Logo.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Gionee Logo.svg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tæ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:9XO logo.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:9XO logo.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Willy1018 (talk) 14:50, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BAGBot: Your bot request Robbot (clone)

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Robbot (clone) as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Naresh Chandra Agrawal (cropped).png

The file File:Naresh Chandra Agrawal (cropped).png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

your A3 on User talk:Tæ

Hi, Junior Jumper, I declined your speedy deletion request on User talk:Tæ. A3 is a criterion that only applies to articles in Wikipedia's main space; it doesn't apply to things in the user or user talk namespace. Also, it does explicitly exclude redirects. That's more or less a technicality, though; is there a particular reason you would like that talk page to be deleted? Generally speaking, it's better to leave such redirects in place, but if there's a decent reason to delete it, then it can be done. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:12, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Writ Keeper Please delete the page.--Junior Jumper (talk) 16:08, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why though? Generally, deletions of user talk pages are not done, due to the loss in records of communications with the user. Redirects from a move obviously don't have important communication history, so that's not a dealbreaker, but deleting that redirect will leave old links to that talkpage (e.g. links in a signature) redlinked. So, I'm not outright refusing, but I do think it's important to have some understanding why you want that page deleted. (If it's a private reason, then feel free to email me.) Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 16:17, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request

User: Junior Jumper,Please also change the Parliament tool diagram of Maharashtra from 289 to 288 seats diagram .Nahtrav (talk)

@Nahtrav: Thank you for the important information but KumarVenati has done it already.--Junior Jumper (talk) 06:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Ok thanks Nahtrav (talk)

Assam Legislative Assembly

Assam Legislative Assembly Why Are You Changing It Two Mlas Have Been Died For Reference You Can See At 2020 elections in India KumarVenati (talk) 16:05, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- SUN EYE 1 07:15, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sangh Parivar without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 10:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller:I have provided an adequate edit summary. How someone had said Bajrang Dal a militant group? They are not terrorists. Junior Jumper (talk) 16:40, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sangh Parivar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 16:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Read Bajrang Dal -it says "The Bajrang Dal is a religious militant organisation^[1]^[2] that forms the youth wing of the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP)." "The US Central Intelligence Agency has classified VHP and Bajrang Dal as religious militant organizations". It doesn't call them terrorists, I don't know where you got that idea. If you want to change how its described, do it at the article about Bajrang Dal - but use the talk page to get consensus as otherwise someone will revert you for removing sourced text. Doug Weller talk 17:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

^ Cite error: The named reference TOI CIA was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ "Inside a far-right Hindu 'self defence' training camp". BBC News. 1 June 2016. Retrieved 15 December 2020.

@Doug Weller: Now will foreign agencies decide the definition of our organizations? A "militant" is someone who is engaged in a war or who acts aggressively for their cause. But Bajrang Dal isn't a militant group. It is a religious youth group. And don't give me the link of BBC news. They have no credibility in our India. They are treated like bastards in our country. --Junior Jumper (talk) 18:15, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks like you won't be very happy here then. Everyone needs to follow our policies and guidelines. We consider the BBC generally reliable. Read Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. I'm not going to argue this with you. Doug Weller talk 18:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Doug Weller: How dare you to call Bajrang Dal a militant organisation? Are you Indian to decide so? Do you know what is Bajrang Dal. What is its ideology? You are a foreigner and you don't have any right to call our country's organisation a militant organisation. They have not killed anyone like Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Taliban. --Junior Jumper (talk) 04:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for persistent tendentious editing

I have blocked you indefinitely for persistent tendentious editing and lack of interest in our policies, as shown above in your responses to Doug Weller. This is an international encyclopedia in English; if you wish to edit according to which sources do or do not have what you call "credibility in our India", this is not the place for you. Everybody in the world can edit here as long as they follow reliable sources, so your notion that "foreigners" don't have any right to edit Indian subjects is completely mistaken. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | tålk 09:55, 30 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Junior Jumper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, I will follow the international standards now on this encyclopedia. But please notice the thing that I have only present my views because Bajrang Dal had not killed anyone like other extremist militant groups. But leave that. I will not argue about that in future because I think this is a topic which need a wider debate. Junior Jumper (talk) 12:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

We aren't interested in your views. Your views are suitable for a blog, but not for an encyclopedia. See WP:NOR, WP:NOT. Yamla (talk) 12:50, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's regrettable that it only occurred to you to follow our rules, or to speak civilly, after being blocked. When Doug Weller, an experienced user and admin, merely explained to you that "everyone needs to follow our policies and guidelines", you chose to jump down his throat: "How dare you?" Speaking to people like that, and then becoming suddenly soft-spoken after a block, does not impress. Bishonen | tålk 13:51, 30 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]
@Bishonen: Sorry for my rude behavior. I apologize 🙏🙏. I promise I will not repeat it in future. --Junior Jumper (talk) 13:56, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Junior Jumper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry for my rude behavior. I apologize 🙏🙏. I promise I will not repeat it in future. The language spoken by me was because of my nationalist ideology and my membership of Bajrang Dal. --Junior Jumper (talk) 16:59, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You will need to tell us what you want to edit about if unblocked. If you are unable to set your ideological views aside for purposes of editing here, you will need to edit about other topics, at least for a time. 331dot (talk) 20:11, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think you need to accept a topic ban from Indian politics. Doug Weller talk 20:28, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: I will not edit the page Bajrang Dal in future. Sorry for my rude language. --Junior Jumper (talk) 04:06, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted, but I think it needs to be from Indian politics in general, not just one article. Doug Weller talk 08:29, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conditions for an unblock

Junior Jumper, you can read about topic bans and what they mean here. Please read it carefully. Do you accept an indefinite topic ban from Indian politics in exchange for your block? Such a topic ban can be appealed to the community, at WP:AN, in not less than six months. If you do accept that and promise to abide by it, I will unblock you. If you don't, I won't. Bishonen | tålk 10:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen: But please give me permission to add parliamentary diagrams. --Junior Jumper (talk) 12:37, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly are parliamentary diagrams? Please link to an example where you added that. Bishonen | tålk 13:20, 31 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen: See here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ahmednagar_Municipal_Corporation&diff=997136925

I see... so you not only added that image, but also created it. You would be allowed to continue creating images on Commons when topic banned, or for that matter when blocked, as now, since you're only blocked (and would only be topic banned) on the English Wikipedia. As for adding this type of image to Wikipedia articles, I'll ping @RegentsPark, SpacemanSpiff, Vanamonde93, and Sitush: do you guys think this would be an OK exception to a T-ban from Indian politics? I suppose there's no scope for any POV editing in adding these self-created diagrams, or is there? If it's a purely helpful thing, I'd be glad to make it an exception. Bishonen | tålk 17:48, 31 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen: The sort of diagrams they are making are indeed helpful, and the potential for pov-pushing is minimal; the only potential avenue for trouble is if the numbers are fudged, and with municipal council elections, checking is often tricky. If we're willing to extend that amount of good faith, then I'd say go for it; I'm not terribly familiar with this user, so I'd prefer not to take a call on that. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:11, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bishonen: Please take the final decision on my block. --Junior Jumper (talk) 06:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll extend good faith and support this. Doug Weller talk 07:48, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, Junior Jumper. Sorry for the delay, but I'm in a different timezone. I do believe that you'd add these helpful diagrams in good faith. If there should be any doubt about the numbers, then please don't make a diagram for that particular article. And please just make the diagrams and add them; you're not supposed to enter into any discussion, or, God forbid, edit warring. Thank you for improving articles with these diagrams. You are now subject to an indefinite topic ban from Indian politics, as logged here, with an exception for the diagrams, and you have been unblocked. I want to add that if you're considering appealing the ban at WP:AN, which you can do in no less than six months, then I strongly advise you to edit in other areas in the meantime. It's important to be able to show in an appeal that you have been editing constructively. People who merely go away for the duration and then appeal don't have much chance of making a good impression. And note that constructive editing at other Wikimedia projects, where you are not topic banned, will also count in your favour. Happy new year. Bishonen | tålk 09:51, 1 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

P.S. And thank you very much, Vanamonde and Doug Weller. Bishonen | tålk 10:08, 1 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen: Thanks 🙏🏻 --Junior Jumper (talk) 16:17, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bishonen: Junior Jumper is violating topic ban[1][2] right after coming off from a failed topic ban appeal where he was taught enough about his similar topic ban violation. [3] Abhishek0831996 (talk) 09:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Abhishek0831996: I was banned from editing the pages of Indian politics. It means that I was supposed to not make any edit in the mainspace of the article. I respect your opinion. But see I have only added the images. I have not made even any single edit in the mainspace. And I think by adding the images I have not violated the rules. In my opinion this should not a big issue as I have only enhanced the quality of the article by adding a single image.--Junior Jumper (talk) 09:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek0831996, technically, adding images other than parliamentary diagrams does violate the topic ban. Images in general were not excepted, just the diagrams. That said, I can't make myself care about additions of completely non-controversial images such as these portraits. De minimis non curat lex. But make sure this is not the thin edge of the wedge, JJ. Bishonen | tålk 10:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[TOI_CIA-1] Cite error: The named reference TOI CIA was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[BBC_2016-2] "Inside a far-right Hindu 'self defence' training camp". BBC News. 1 June 2016. Retrieved 15 December 2020.

[1]

[2]