Talk:ExxonMobil climate change denial
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ExxonMobil climate change denial article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about ExxonMobil climate change denial. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about ExxonMobil climate change denial at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to climate change, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Material from ExxonMobil was split to ExxonMobil climate change controversy on 14:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:ExxonMobil. |
Name change
[edit]Was there a name change discussion related to this page? I haven't been following it too closely but I just noticed the change from about 10 months back [1]. I don't see any discussion related to the change. I think the older title was more appropriate as this is more complex than simple "denial". I also don't see discussions associated with the changes to the lead. The current lead conflates the activities of Exxon, Mobile and the later ExxonMobile company as if they were a single organization the whole time. That should probably be cleaned up and clarified. Ping involved editors @William M. Connolley and InvadingInvader: Springee (talk) 13:44, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- I changed the name since this article mostly revolves around Exxon and later ExxonMobil's activities relating to the denial of climate change specifically. I think it's a more precise title. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 21:17, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- Service: The name was changed from "ExxonMobil climate change controversy" to "ExxonMobil climate change denial" in November 2022.
- It's annoying when people do not mention the actual names (before and after) in such situations, especially years later. --Hob Gadling (talk) 05:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
ExxonMobil's support for carbon tax
[edit]There's a sentence "In 2015 it expressed support for a carbon tax.", and the cited article from the Economist is from 2015, but it explicitly mentions, that EM support carbon tax since 2007 ([2]). On the other hand, EM's own website says 2009 ([3]).
Moreover, there's a kind of a followup on The Guardian from 2021 ([4]), which says in the first paragraph, with a link to a video:
"Lobbyists for ExxonMobil have described the oil giant’s backing for a carbon tax as a public relations ploy intended to stall more serious measures to combat the climate crisis." Tr00per (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)