Vortex shedding: Difference between revisions
m →External links: clean up; http→https for YouTube using AWB |
Add detail and image |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:Vortex-street-animation.gif|frame|right|Vortex shedding behind a circular cylinder. In this animation, the flow on the two sides of the cylinder are shown in different colors, to show that the vortices from the two sides alternate. Courtesy, Cesareo de La Rosa Siqueira.]] |
[[Image:Vortex-street-animation.gif|frame|right|Vortex shedding behind a circular cylinder. In this animation, the flow on the two sides of the cylinder are shown in different colors, to show that the vortices from the two sides alternate. Courtesy, Cesareo de La Rosa Siqueira.]] |
||
⚫ | |||
In [[fluid dynamics]], '''vortex shedding''' is an oscillating [[Fluid dynamics|flow]] that takes place when a fluid such as air or water flows past a bluff (as opposed to streamlined) body at certain velocities, depending on the size and shape of the body. In this flow, [[Vortex|vortices]] are created at the back of the body and detach periodically from either side of the body. See [[Von Kármán vortex street]]. The fluid flow past the object creates alternating low-pressure [[Vortex|vortices]] on the downstream side of the object. The object will tend to move toward the low-pressure zone. |
In [[fluid dynamics]], '''vortex shedding''' is an oscillating [[Fluid dynamics|flow]] that takes place when a fluid such as air or water flows past a bluff (as opposed to streamlined) body at certain velocities, depending on the size and shape of the body. In this flow, [[Vortex|vortices]] are created at the back of the body and detach periodically from either side of the body. See [[Von Kármán vortex street]]. The fluid flow past the object creates alternating low-pressure [[Vortex|vortices]] on the downstream side of the object. The object will tend to move toward the low-pressure zone. |
||
If the bluff structure is not mounted rigidly and the frequency of vortex shedding matches the [[Resonance|resonance frequency]] of the structure, the structure can begin to [[resonate]], vibrating with [[Harmonic oscillator|harmonic oscillations]] driven by the energy of the flow. This vibration is the cause for overhead power line wires '''"singing in the wind"''',<ref>''The Mechanical Universe: Mechanics and Heat, Advanced Edition'', [https://books.google.com/books?id=ZTnxQGJ1fHMC&pg=PA326 p. 326]</ref> and for the fluttering of automobile [[Whip antenna|whip radio antennas]] at some speeds. Tall [[chimneys]] constructed of thin-walled steel tube can be sufficiently flexible that, in air flow with a speed in the critical range, vortex shedding can drive the chimney into violent oscillations that can damage or destroy the chimney. |
If the bluff structure is not mounted rigidly and the frequency of vortex shedding matches the [[Resonance|resonance frequency]] of the structure, the structure can begin to [[resonate]], vibrating with [[Harmonic oscillator|harmonic oscillations]] driven by the energy of the flow. This vibration is the cause for overhead power line wires '''"singing in the wind"''',<ref>''The Mechanical Universe: Mechanics and Heat, Advanced Edition'', [https://books.google.com/books?id=ZTnxQGJ1fHMC&pg=PA326 p. 326]</ref> and for the fluttering of automobile [[Whip antenna|whip radio antennas]] at some speeds. Tall [[chimneys]] constructed of thin-walled steel tube can be sufficiently flexible that, in air flow with a speed in the critical range, vortex shedding can drive the chimney into violent oscillations that can damage or destroy the chimney. |
||
Vortex shedding was one of the causes proposed for the failure of the original [[Tacoma Narrows Bridge (1940)|Tacoma Narrows Bridge]] (Galloping Gertie) in 1940, but was rejected because the frequency of the vortex shedding did not match that of the bridge. The bridge actually failed by [[aeroelasticity#Flutter|aeroelastic flutter]].<ref>K. Billah and R. Scanlan (1991), ''Resonance, Tacoma Narrows Bridge Failure, and Undergraduate Physics Textbooks'', [[American Journal of Physics]], 59(2), 118--124 [http://www.ketchum.org/billah/Billah-Scanlan.pdf (PDF)]</ref> |
Vortex shedding was one of the causes proposed for the failure of the original [[Tacoma Narrows Bridge (1940)|Tacoma Narrows Bridge]] (Galloping Gertie) in 1940, but was rejected because the frequency of the vortex shedding did not match that of the bridge. The bridge actually failed by [[aeroelasticity#Flutter|aeroelastic flutter]].<ref>K. Billah and R. Scanlan (1991), ''Resonance, Tacoma Narrows Bridge Failure, and Undergraduate Physics Textbooks'', [[American Journal of Physics]], 59(2), 118--124 [http://www.ketchum.org/billah/Billah-Scanlan.pdf (PDF)]</ref> |
||
Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
The frequency at which vortex shedding takes place for an infinite cylinder is related to the Strouhal number by the following equation: |
The frequency at which vortex shedding takes place for an infinite cylinder is related to the Strouhal number by the following equation: |
||
:<math>\mathrm{St} = \frac{f \cdot D}{V}</math> |
:<math>\mathrm{St} = \frac{f \cdot D}{V}</math> |
||
Where <math>\mathrm{St}</math> is the [[Strouhal number]], <math>f</math> is the vortex shedding frequency, <math>D</math> is the diameter of the cylinder, and <math>V</math> is the flow velocity. |
Where <math>\mathrm{St}</math> is the dimensionless [[Strouhal number]], <math>f</math> is the vortex shedding frequency, <math>D</math> is the diameter of the cylinder, and <math>V</math> is the flow velocity. |
||
The Strouhal number depends on the body shape and on the [[Reynolds number]]. |
The Strouhal number depends on the body shape and on the [[Reynolds number]] but a value of 0.2 is commonly used for estimating purposes. |
||
== Mitigation of vortex shedding effects == |
== Mitigation of vortex shedding effects == |
||
[[File:SchornsteinwendelSKL.jpg|thumb|A helical strake on a chimney stack]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
Modern tall smokestacks usually have a corkscrew fin (a [[strake (aviation)|strake]]) to deliberately introduce turbulence, so that the load is less variable and resonant load frequencies have negligible amplitudes.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.mms.gov/tarprojects/485/Session3aVIVApplicationstoDeepwaterPipelines-BrownFile1%20.pdf | title= VIV Lecture | author = R. J. Brown }}</ref> |
|||
Fairings can be fitted to a structure to streamline the flow past the structure, such as on an aircraft wing. |
|||
Tall metal smokestacks or other tubular structures such as antenna masts or tethered cables can be fitted with an external corkscrew fin (a [[strake (aviation)|strake]]) to deliberately introduce turbulence, so that the load is less variable and resonant load frequencies have negligible amplitudes.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.mms.gov/tarprojects/485/Session3aVIVApplicationstoDeepwaterPipelines-BrownFile1%20.pdf | title= VIV Lecture | author = R. J. Brown }}</ref> The effectiveness of helical strakes for reducing vortex induced vibration was discovered in 1957 by Christopher Scruton and D. E. J. Walshe at the [[National Physics Laboratory]] in Great Britain. They are therefore often described as Scruton strakes. For maximum effectiveness each fin or strake should have a height of about 10 percent of the cylinder diameter and a pitch for each fin of approximately 5 times the cylinder diameter. <ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.helicalstrakes.com/|title=Helical Strakes|publisher=VIV Solutions LLC|accessdate= 19 January 2017}} </ref> |
|||
A [[Stockbridge damper]] is used to mitigate [[aeolian vibration]]s caused by vortex shedding on [[overhead power line]]s. |
A [[Stockbridge damper]] is used to mitigate [[aeolian vibration]]s caused by vortex shedding on [[overhead power line]]s. |
Revision as of 17:15, 19 January 2017
In fluid dynamics, vortex shedding is an oscillating flow that takes place when a fluid such as air or water flows past a bluff (as opposed to streamlined) body at certain velocities, depending on the size and shape of the body. In this flow, vortices are created at the back of the body and detach periodically from either side of the body. See Von Kármán vortex street. The fluid flow past the object creates alternating low-pressure vortices on the downstream side of the object. The object will tend to move toward the low-pressure zone.
If the bluff structure is not mounted rigidly and the frequency of vortex shedding matches the resonance frequency of the structure, the structure can begin to resonate, vibrating with harmonic oscillations driven by the energy of the flow. This vibration is the cause for overhead power line wires "singing in the wind",[1] and for the fluttering of automobile whip radio antennas at some speeds. Tall chimneys constructed of thin-walled steel tube can be sufficiently flexible that, in air flow with a speed in the critical range, vortex shedding can drive the chimney into violent oscillations that can damage or destroy the chimney.
Vortex shedding was one of the causes proposed for the failure of the original Tacoma Narrows Bridge (Galloping Gertie) in 1940, but was rejected because the frequency of the vortex shedding did not match that of the bridge. The bridge actually failed by aeroelastic flutter.[2]
A thrill ride, "VertiGo" at Cedar Point in Sandusky, Ohio suffered vortex shedding during the winter of 2001, causing one of the three towers to collapse. The ride was closed for the winter at the time.[3] Hasheminejad refinery stacks suffered vortex shedding from 1975 to 2003, seven times irregularly. Some simulation and analyses were done to revealed that the main cause is the interaction of the pilot and stack. The problem solved by removing the pilot. [4]
Governing equation
The frequency at which vortex shedding takes place for an infinite cylinder is related to the Strouhal number by the following equation:
Where is the dimensionless Strouhal number, is the vortex shedding frequency, is the diameter of the cylinder, and is the flow velocity.
The Strouhal number depends on the body shape and on the Reynolds number but a value of 0.2 is commonly used for estimating purposes.
Mitigation of vortex shedding effects
Fairings can be fitted to a structure to streamline the flow past the structure, such as on an aircraft wing.
Tall metal smokestacks or other tubular structures such as antenna masts or tethered cables can be fitted with an external corkscrew fin (a strake) to deliberately introduce turbulence, so that the load is less variable and resonant load frequencies have negligible amplitudes.[5] The effectiveness of helical strakes for reducing vortex induced vibration was discovered in 1957 by Christopher Scruton and D. E. J. Walshe at the National Physics Laboratory in Great Britain. They are therefore often described as Scruton strakes. For maximum effectiveness each fin or strake should have a height of about 10 percent of the cylinder diameter and a pitch for each fin of approximately 5 times the cylinder diameter. [6]
A Stockbridge damper is used to mitigate aeolian vibrations caused by vortex shedding on overhead power lines.
See also
- Aeroelastic Flutter - vibration-induced vortices - by way of contrast
- Vortex
- Vortex-induced vibration
- Von Kármán vortex street
References
- ^ The Mechanical Universe: Mechanics and Heat, Advanced Edition, p. 326
- ^ K. Billah and R. Scanlan (1991), Resonance, Tacoma Narrows Bridge Failure, and Undergraduate Physics Textbooks, American Journal of Physics, 59(2), 118--124 (PDF)
- ^ Maureen Byko (May 2002). "Materials Give Roller Coaster Enthusiasts a Reason to Scream". The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society. Retrieved 2009-02-22.
- ^ "Engineering Service". Retrieved 2016-06-22.
- ^ R. J. Brown. "VIV Lecture" (PDF).
- ^ "Helical Strakes". VIV Solutions LLC. Retrieved 19 January 2017.