Jump to content

User talk:Barr Theo: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DPL bot (talk | contribs)
dablink notification message (see the FAQ)
Warning: Copyright violation on Miles Barron.
Line 345: Line 345:


([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 05:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 05:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

== January 2024 ==

[[File:Copyright-problem.svg|30px|link=|alt=Copyright problem icon]] Your edit to [[:Miles Barron]] has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyrighted]] material to Wikipedia without evidence of [[Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission|permission]] from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''content'', such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy '''will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''. See [[Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources]] for more information. <!-- Template:uw-copyright --> — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 15:10, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:10, 11 January 2024

Welcome!

Hello, Barr Theo, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! GiantSnowman 06:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greece national football team results (1980–1999), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Hill. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Josep Samitier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antonio Bonet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Career stats tables

Hi there. Thanks for adding the career statistics table at Herbert Potts. Going forward, please use the standard table layout as outlined at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players. It is the result of past discussions of the community of football editors at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football.

I've fixed the issues at Herbert Potts in this change. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 18:00, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vivian Woodward

Hello!

I read his article about the international goals and saw the notes explaining the 73 goals instead of 75, but I think the article with the most international goals should, for now, mention 75 for consistency reasons with the sources, including the general source.

In addition, that WP article has a secondary ranking (always had), which is why he is the first one mentioned from the players of the 12th position, which secondary ranking is that the player who achieved the number earlier (i.e. in fewer matches) is mentioned before in case of a tie.

Kind regards,

Lorry Gundersen (talk) 16:31, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jan van den Berg (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Car Crash.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eugen Schmidt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skating.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1923 Copa del Rey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Juan Artola.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited City gate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Absolutism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Barr Theo. Thank you for creating David Mauchan. User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the articles!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 23:18, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joan Gamper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Otto Maier.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Barr Theo. Thank you for creating Hippodrome of Can Tunis. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:20, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jaime Vila, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Honorary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tovar 2011

In 1894 Taça D. Carlos I, there's a reference to Tovar 2011, but the full citation is never specified. Could you provide it? Thanks. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:14, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That was Clenixon's doing, not me. But thanks for the warning, I will remove it immediately since there are other references who cover that information. Thanks! Barr Theo (talk) 00:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oporto Cricket and Lawn Tennis Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campo Alegre.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving Sources

Hello! View history which is located right above the article --> Fix dead links. Kind regards, Lorry Gundersen (talk) 19:11, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly the bot doing these archives isn't working right now. A bug report has been made. I will wait for that to be fixed... Barr Theo (talk) 23:23, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Locomotoras Albacete, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cartagena.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited English Colony of Barcelona Football Team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Cochran.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Henry W. Brown

The issue is that the subject of your article is not the primary subject. Most likely, there is no primary subject. So once you create your article, a hatnote on both pages would suffice. Onel5969 TT me 09:51, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see... So I should ada said hatnote in Henry William Brown the ace and Henry W. Brown the footballer and that's it?
I want to stress the fact that EVERY link to Henry W. Brown is related to the footballer. There is not a single link to Henry W. Brown that is related to the ace. I made sure of that.
Thank you for trying to find a way.
PS: Do you know know how to archive sources/references? Barr Theo (talk) 14:14, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1902 USFSA Football Championship
added a link pointing to Normandie
English Colony of Barcelona Football Team
added a link pointing to Spring

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Clenixon per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Clenixon. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:09, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, its true. Barr Theo and Clenixon are in fact the same person... The reason that led me to use multiple accounts was purely aesthetic. Basically, my main account (Clenixon) was for the big edits (usually over 5,000 bytes) while this one was for the smaller ones. I have never used multiple accounts to deceive or mislead other editors, disrupt discussions, distort consensus, avoid sanctions, evade blocks, or otherwise violate community standards and policies. With this said, I have logged out multiple times to make edits as an IP address, and for that there is no excuse.
If my actions are deemed excusable and if you judge me whorthy of a second chance, I shall renounce all my claims on Clenixon (leave it blocked) and never again use IP addresses, and take upon Barr Theo as my only account. If necessary, I can also list in each page the existence of the other account with an explanation of their purpose.
On the other hand, if my actions are deemed too serious and vile, and if my accounts remain forever blocked, I will also understand.
Since this is the first time I am going through this, I am unware of the proceedings. So I am deeply scared about what might happen to my contributions. Everything I have done, I did it in good faith, I promise. I always searched and cited reliable sources in every article and I have always done it with my own words in order to respect copyright rules, sept for two or three occasional "fevers of laziness". My work surely does not deserve complete extermination and anihilation. That is what I fear the most...
What should my next move be? I hope you can guide me through this. Kind regards. Barr Theo (talk) 16:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi. I had noticed your block a few days back, but I'm only writing now. Honestly I'm not surprised. I don't think that your reasoning above is a legitimate reason to use two different accounts, especially considering that you didn't disclose it. However, I do believe that it's sad; apart from a few isolated copyvio issues, your contributions have been really good when it comes to Spanish football. Really, those were super interesting and well written in many cases—I patrolled quite a few of them, you know. I'm not sure what Bbb23 thinks for it, but I do think that you deserve a second chance, with a one-account restriction that is. If you wish, you can follow the instructions on the template and request an unblock with {{unblock|reason=}}. Oh and, the archive tool is back since a few days, the pages you mentioned in November on my talk have been archived. ~StyyxTalk? 14:43, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello Styyx. Do you know how much time does it take for an unblock request to be reviewed? Kind regards. Barr Theo (talk) 22:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Varies a lot, usually within a few days, but it may take longer. ~StyyxTalk? 11:18, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Barr Theo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary because I understand why I was blocked, and I will not do it again. I shall renounce all my claims on Clenixon (or you can simply leave Clenixon blocked), never again use IP addresses, and take upon Barr Theo as my only account (give me a one-account restriction if you need to). I will keep making productive contributions with my one and only account. Kind regards. Barr Theo (talk) 16:16, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per WP:ILLEGIT, editing same page with different accounts without disclosing the connection, is not allowed. You also admit that you were using IP socking multiple times. Your only way to get unblocked is the WP:STANDARD OFFER. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would like to echo the sentiment of the comments made by User:Styyx above; generally the edits have been constructive, well-intentioned and legitimate and the interactions have been courteous, nothing that would come close to incurring a ban in those respects. I really can't think of a reason for you to muck about with multiple accounts in that way, maybe you didn't realise how much that is frowned upon, but why do it anyway? I would like to reassure you that your contributions will not be erased - for one thing, you don't own them, they are now the property of Wikipedia. The disadvantage you will have, besides not being able to contribute more at present, is that if any of your additions get challenged and nominated for deletion in the coming months (which is possible, some of this is pretty niche stuff within the "amateur semi-organised gentlemen's era" of Spanish football - it's interesting to me and a few others, but not everyone will consider the teams and players independently notable even with all the time that people, mainly yourself, have taken on creating the articles), you won't be able to challenge it personally, nor make improvements which could prevent its deletion. And editors may take a harsher judgement on borderline stuff because it it came from a banned user (or an IP liked to them). But there will be no blanket 'banned user=all content deleted' operation. Hope to see you back some time if it still interests you. Crowsus (talk) 04:54, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Barr Theo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Today, exactly six months had passed since I was blocked as a sockpuppet, and therefore I would like to use the Wikipedia:Standard offer. I have made no edits, using any account or anonymously, on the English Wikipedia, during these six months (sept here, on my user talk page). The reason that led me to use multiple accounts was purely aesthetic and never ill-intended. I never used multiple accounts to deceive or mislead other editors, disrupt discussions, distort consensus, avoid sanctions, evade blocks, or otherwise violate community standards and policies. Regardless, I understand why I was blocked, and will never do it again. I shall renounce all my claims on Clenixon (or you can simply leave Clenixon blocked), never again use IP addresses, and take upon Barr Theo as my only account (give me a one-account restriction if you need to). I have learned from my mistake and believe I deserve a second chance. I will keep making productive contributions with my one and only account. Kind regards. Barr Theo (talk) 15:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I'm unblocking your account subject to a one-account restriction. Specifically, you may not operate any account except for this one, and may not intentionally edit while logged out. If you accidentally edit while you are logged out, you may correct that by immediately claiming credit for the edit using this account. Seraphimblade Talk to me 16:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser data shows no evidence of recent sockpuppetry or block evasion. --Yamla (talk) 15:32, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sparta Rotterdam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cool.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ludvig Sylow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rational mechanics.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Barr Theo. Thank you for your work on Harald Hilarius-Kalkau. User:Curbon7, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work! Some sources may exist on GBooks or newspapers.com, so it may be worth looking there as well.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Curbon7}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Curbon7 (talk) 09:32, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Barr Theo. Thank you for your work on Holten Castenschiold. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donald McBane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brabant.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Barr Theo. Thank you for your work on Louis Østrup. User:BeanieFan11, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BeanieFan11}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What you have done with the article - pasting the full text to the redirect target and replacing the article itself with a redirect - is known in Wikipedia as cut-and-paste move. Technically, it is a copyright violation, since it does not preserve the contribution history. You should never do this again and use the move button. I have now reverted the move. Now, I do not have a strong opinion on the move itself, but the reason you provided - the English Wikipedia does not use the Catalan name system - does not look particularly strong, and I am not even sure the statement is correct. It would be safe to start a requested move for this article. Ymblanter (talk) 06:37, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nikola Milojević (tennis), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Language codes

Hey, Barr Theo. I found two articles (Kent Carlsson and Johan Sjögren) you contributed to recently where you gave the wrong language code for the references. While the top-level domain for Swedish websites is .se, the code for the Swedish language is actually sv. The code se refers to the Northern Sámi language. I encourage you to excercise some more caution when it comes to language codes in the future (I personally just write out the full name of the language so stuff like this doesn't happen). Thanks. ArcticSeeress (talk) 04:55, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lionel Messi

Hello! Which link? Kind regards, Lorry Gundersen (talk) 16:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I see...I thought you meant specific link(s) doesn't(don't) get archived... the archiving bot doesn't seem to be working at the moment; I tried it to several pages and it was unresponsive in all of them, also the site/server is down... I am curious...do you only have this on Messi and works at other pages? Lorry Gundersen (talk) 18:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rafael Nadal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rafael Nadal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rio.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roger Federer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Félix Mantilla.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Serena

Don't do too much on Serena Williams as I have it in my sandbox for a complete re-write. I've already removed all the refs from the lead section as they are never supposed to have refs to begin with. Fyunck(click) (talk) 01:20, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

as they are never supposed to have refs to begin with Not exactly true. See MOS:LEADCITE. Robby.is.on (talk) 01:37, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We do our best to avoid them would be better. But we also have to make sure it is covered with sourcing in the main body. And there are also circumstances where it can't be avoided. If there is a source in the lead it's no biggie and might be needed... if there are five we didn't do a good job. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Barr Theo. Thank you for your work on Einar Middelboe. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:08, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited 1911–12 FC Barcelona season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Lambe.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Miles Barron has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:10, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]