User talk:Sharma666

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 10:13, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ravensfire (talk) 03:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sharma666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I admit the reason for me being blocked is correct(gaming ECP and use of sockpuppet) and my request on for unblock is i can convince you that it wont be repeated please go through my points 1.Yes, the alleged account muslimkshtrana is my account also mewar11111 is mine, here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rajput#Rajput_Translation is used this because someone vandalize 'rajput' translation as 'Bastard(illegitimate sons)' it was ECP so i couldn't edit myself the. though eventually some user removed the derogatory term. You can check the contribution This is the only thing i used thesr accounts for No Good Faith Edit, Disruptive behavior or Abuse was hurled at any one. (sharma666 was under recovery) 2.I Realized, even for such derogatory insult removal talk page took about 10 days, it was very time taking and energy consuming and i also had poor english so decided to use ECP gaming, however all my ECP edits were legit and constructive, No Good Faith Edit, Disruptive behavior or Abuse was hurled at any one. You can check the contribution there are few edits and no other user had issue with that. neither was i involved in war with any of the user 3.the sockpuppetry incident that blocked me https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rajput#Why_shouldn't_we_remove_the_Bihari_Rajput_watching_mallah_fisherman_image. active user LukeEmily also admitted that this image shouldn't be used on WIKI however as user Heba Aisha requested she immediately changed her stance that it can be used elsewhere but not on this article , i felt i was already 0-2 as they both have has had rapport between each other as had been working on same article and debates for a while(not blaming them, they are just human and its natural) her change of stance and alter of previous statement and other being uploader of image himself so sockpuppetry was used to get stalemate so that her stance wont change again and consensus could be preserved. no abuse was hurled at any of the other user. the image = https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/23/Bihari_Rajput_villagers_watching_Mallah_fishermen.jpg 4.Please see my editing behaviour on article never have i violated wiki guideline , only to remove derogatory or inappropriate content(which was considered inappropriate by others too) i took help of ECP gaming and sockpuppet, i admit of my mistake but my block should not be indefinite as my editings and spirt has never caused vandalism and i request you to see this as an assurance that sockpuppetry wont be repeated and the block atleast be limited to a specific time period if cant be revoked @NinjaRobotPirate:@Ravensfiree: Sharma666 (talk) 09:03, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

So, we have your violations of WP:SOCK. We have your attempts to game ECP, including literally hundreds of pointless edits here (despite your ludicrous claim "all my ECP edits were legit and constructive"). Here, we have you blaming others for your own behaviour. Given that, I'm declining your unblock request. Your best bet is to wait six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. At that point, your unblock request will need to be substantially more convincing. Yamla (talk) 10:31, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

by legit and constructive edits i meant those few that i made after becoming ECP, the hundreds of pointless edits(my on userpage) were made to become ECP so that i could put forward my points. that said i do agree to follow the standard procedure of six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO, thanks Sharma666 (talk) 10:45, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sharma666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

From the past 6 months since june i had spent enough time reflecting upon the actions of my past which lead me to this and i am completely ashamed of it and understand that what i had done was wrong. My mistakes were as follows 1. ECP gamming to make myself eligible to edit an extended protected page 2. Use of Sock puppetry to win over a debate both of which do not comply with community standard of wikipedia and i deeply regret my action i wish i could have acted more maturely showed more patience. i am very passionate about wikipedia and a as scholar of history the ban was very pinching to me and trust me i do have learned my lesson and to assume you that my words have some value and i really want to contribute in a useful and transparent way i suggest that i should be topic-banned from caste related article for atleast 90 days and untill i have made atleast 45 constructive edits until given rights of a normal editor @Yamla: can u review my request please Sharma666 (talk) 14:12, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You haven't yet waited six months. Once you have done so, make a new request. Someone else will review it. Yamla (talk) 14:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Once this user has waited the full six months, note there's no evidence of recent block evasion or sockpuppetry (based on checkuser data). That should count in favour of an unblock, but the reviewing admin should still consult with the blocking admin, NinjaRobotPirate. --Yamla (talk) 14:19, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Sharma666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As admin @Yamla asked asked me to wait,today i have completed exactly 6 months of ban since 26 june hence i repeat at my plea again that i had spent enough time reflecting upon the actions of my past which lead me to this and i am completely ashamed of it and i understand that what i had done was wrong. My mistakes were as follows

1. ECP gamming to make myself eligible to edit an extended protected page 2. Use of Sock puppetry to win over a debate

both of which do not comply with community standard of wikipedia and i deeply regret my action i wish i could have acted more maturely showed more patience. i am very passionate about wikipedia and a as scholar of history the ban was very pinching to me and trust me i do have learned my lesson and to assure you that my words have some value and i really want to contribute in a useful and transparent way i suggest that i should be topic-banned from caste related article for atleast 90 days and untill i have made atleast 45 constructive edits until given rights of a normal editor again. @NinjaRobotPirate: can you please review my request Sharma666 (talk) 07:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=As admin @Yamla asked asked me to wait,today i have completed exactly 6 months of ban since 26 june hence i repeat at my plea again that i had spent enough time reflecting upon the actions of my past which lead me to this and i am completely ashamed of it and i understand that what i had done was wrong. My mistakes were as follows '''1. ECP gamming to make myself eligible to edit an extended protected page''' '''2. Use of Sock puppetry to win over a debate''' both of which do not comply with community standard of wikipedia and i deeply regret my action i wish i could have acted more maturely showed more patience. i am very passionate about wikipedia and a as scholar of history the ban was very pinching to me and trust me i do have learned my lesson and to assure you that my words have some value and i really want to contribute in a useful and transparent way i suggest that i should be topic-banned from caste related article for atleast 90 days and untill i have made atleast 45 constructive edits until given rights of a normal editor again. <span class="template-ping">@[[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]]:</span> can you please review my request [[User:Sharma666|Sharma666]] ([[User talk:Sharma666#top|talk]]) 07:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=As admin @Yamla asked asked me to wait,today i have completed exactly 6 months of ban since 26 june hence i repeat at my plea again that i had spent enough time reflecting upon the actions of my past which lead me to this and i am completely ashamed of it and i understand that what i had done was wrong. My mistakes were as follows '''1. ECP gamming to make myself eligible to edit an extended protected page''' '''2. Use of Sock puppetry to win over a debate''' both of which do not comply with community standard of wikipedia and i deeply regret my action i wish i could have acted more maturely showed more patience. i am very passionate about wikipedia and a as scholar of history the ban was very pinching to me and trust me i do have learned my lesson and to assure you that my words have some value and i really want to contribute in a useful and transparent way i suggest that i should be topic-banned from caste related article for atleast 90 days and untill i have made atleast 45 constructive edits until given rights of a normal editor again. <span class="template-ping">@[[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]]:</span> can you please review my request [[User:Sharma666|Sharma666]] ([[User talk:Sharma666#top|talk]]) 07:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=As admin @Yamla asked asked me to wait,today i have completed exactly 6 months of ban since 26 june hence i repeat at my plea again that i had spent enough time reflecting upon the actions of my past which lead me to this and i am completely ashamed of it and i understand that what i had done was wrong. My mistakes were as follows '''1. ECP gamming to make myself eligible to edit an extended protected page''' '''2. Use of Sock puppetry to win over a debate''' both of which do not comply with community standard of wikipedia and i deeply regret my action i wish i could have acted more maturely showed more patience. i am very passionate about wikipedia and a as scholar of history the ban was very pinching to me and trust me i do have learned my lesson and to assure you that my words have some value and i really want to contribute in a useful and transparent way i suggest that i should be topic-banned from caste related article for atleast 90 days and untill i have made atleast 45 constructive edits until given rights of a normal editor again. <span class="template-ping">@[[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]]:</span> can you please review my request [[User:Sharma666|Sharma666]] ([[User talk:Sharma666#top|talk]]) 07:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

To show good faith,i have improved an article Deo Surya Mandir please see below section, i am really-really serious about my words thay i will stand by the wikki guidelines.I know its very tough on your part to believe me and so all i request you is to atleast assume that i will not be an issue as you have all the the power to bring me down if i do so and make sure never get back up back even i wont have anything in my defence then so i request you to grant me a second and final chance 13:57, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

• Pinging CU @Yamla: - I know you checked above, but as that was 2 months ago, an additional look felt like it would be beneficial. Pinging @NinjaRobotPirate: in their role as blocking admin. I do feel as if the user is attempting to get ahead of us imposing stricter conditional unblocks, and indeed, indefinite TBAN and 500 edits post any unblock before applying to PERM for extended confirmed, and 1 account limit, would be my initial thoughts. --Nosebagbear (talk) 13:26, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Checked again, still no signs of sockpuppetry or block evasion. --Yamla (talk) 13:36, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

There are millions of pages on Wikipedia to edit. If unblocked, I also see no reason why this editor should be allowed to go right back to a topic where they obviously have trouble. Nosebagbear's unblock conditions seem alright to me. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:42, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

• Hi @Sharma666:, please take a look at the conditions I proposed in my message above and let me know whether you would agree to them. The TBAN would be on "An indefinite TBAN on Castes and Social Groups, broadly defined". The TBAN, the 1 account restriction would be indefinite, appealable to the Community at WP:AN in six months, and every six months thereafter. You would be able to request manual extended-confirmed from WP:PERM after you had made 500 additional edits from now (let's call it 530 undeleted edits), or any point thereafter. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:31, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
• I'm also going to stress, right now, that I'd advise you stay out of the two discretionary sanctions areas you were alerted to above for the first six months (the 2nd is entirely within your TBAN, so you can't edit that at all, anyway), on top of the TBAN - as a recently unblocked editor you'll be at risk of any 50/50 calls coming down against you. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:31, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello @Nosebagbear: thanks for responding to my request.

I understand and agree to every condition that you have put forward,

My understanding is as follows :

1) I Would be indefinitely TBAN from caste related article and must wait atleast six months before i can appeal against it.

2) I cannot create any another account and must wait atleast six months before i can appeal against it, similar to TBAN.

3) I should stay away from controversial pages(by the second discretionary sanctions area pages you ment those involving ind‐pak‐afg etc conflicts) for atleast six months,which i definitely would.I have decided that i wont do any edit that could lead to a debate. Sharma666 (talk) 19:40, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your TBAN is against caste-related and social groups articles, but yes 1 & 2 are otherwise as noted. Regarding the discretionary sanction areas (ind-pak-afg and south asian social groups), the latter would be covered by your TBAN, but the former is a good example of controversial articles to avoid for six months. There is also the condition on not seeking extended-confirmed rights until you've had another 500 edits. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Yes,TBAN is against caste-related and social groups articles and i can only ask for extended-confirmed rights after 500+x undeleted edits (where x=no. of edits done before being unblocked). just one query @Nosebagbear:, after being unblocked do users need to keep their block related notices and discussions permanently or they can be removed from the talk page ? Sharma666 (talk) 08:15, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Unblocked users can remove the notices from their talk page. The block/unblock remains visible in the block log, should someone search it, and the restrictions will be at WP:CONDUNBLOCK Nosebagbear (talk) 11:58, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

An Attempt To Show Good Faith For Second Chance

Deo Surya Mandir is a Hindu temple in Bihar, India. The temple is a Sun shrine, dedicated to Lord Sun for Chhath Puja. The temple is located in Deo Town, Aurangabad in the Indian State of Bihar. The Temple is unique as it faces west, the setting sun, not the usual rising sun. Considered to be one of The most sacred place for sun worshiping and Chhath puja.

History

the origin and history is mostly based upon mythological and legendry accounts which exists in oral tradition such as it is said that once Lord Vishwakarma was asked to build a temple in one night by lord sun, and lord Vishwakarma built the Deo Sun Temple in one night. The authentic history of the temple and area begins during pala and senua period, the inscription outside the temple dated 1437 record the dedication of temple by king Bhairavendra to Jagannath,his brother Balbhadra and his sister Subhadra beside describing the area and recording list of 12 ancestors of the king Bhairavendra, suggestion that the temple present state due to these local hindu chieftains who recovered the temple after Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar Khalji invasion of bengal.According to some scholar on basis of temple facing west insted of east as sun temples tend to do, the deo sun temple could have been originally a buddhist temple destroyed by Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar Khalji and later converted to sun temple by Bhairavendra

Attempt to date

According to some sanskrit scholar of kashi who tried to date it on basis of sanskrit ashioka engraved on slabs outside temple, according to them the temple is 9,49,093 years old however this date is not accepted by prehistorians and archeologist. some gupta era inscription dated 642 AD talks about sun worshiping though not directly referring to deo sun temple however such inscription and local oral tradition do hint at presence of temple in about 7th or 8th AD. ASI too dates back temple to about 8th century AD

Architecture and design

The temple is a mixture of Nagri Architecture, Dravidian architecture & Vesara architecture. Dome shape is carved above the Dev Sun Temple which is very beautiful. Above the dome is a gold urn which can be seen shining from far away, which makes the temple very beautiful and grand.

Cultural Significance

The temple is famous for its annual chhat festival celebration, lakhs of devotees from all over Bihar and other region visit temple to worship, attend chhath mela, bathe in the holy ‘Surya Kund’ and offer 'arghya'