Jump to content

Accident (1967 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Accident
Directed byJoseph Losey
Screenplay byHarold Pinter
Based onAccident
1965 novel
by Nicholas Mosley
Produced byJoseph Losey
Norman Priggen
StarringDirk Bogarde
Stanley Baker
Jacqueline Sassard
CinematographyGerry Fisher
Edited byReginald Beck
Music byJohn Dankworth
Distributed byLondon Independent Producers
Release date
  • February 1967 (1967-02)
Running time
105 minutes
CountryUnited Kingdom
LanguageEnglish
Budget£299,970.00[1] or £272,811[2][3]
Box office£40,010 (UK gross)[2]
£95,153 (world gross)[2]

Accident is a 1967 British drama film directed by Joseph Losey. Written by Harold Pinter, it is an adaptation of the 1965 novel Accident by Nicholas Mosley. It is the second of three Losey–Pinter collaborations; the others being The Servant (1963) and The Go-Between (1971).[4][5] At the 1967 Cannes Film Festival, Accident won the Grand Prix Spécial du Jury award.[6] It also won the Grand Prix of the Belgian Film Critics Association.[7][8][9]


Plot

[edit]

Stephen, a married Oxford tutor in his forties, has two students: the rich and likeable William, of whom he is fond, and a beautiful, enigmatic Austrian named Anna, whom he secretly covets. William also fancies Anna and hopes to know her better. While his wife is away having their third child, Stephen looks up an old flame in London and they sleep together. Returning home, he finds that his pushy colleague Charley has been using the house for sex with Anna. She tells Stephen privately that she and William are engaged to be married.

William says that he will come to Stephen's house after a party that night. As he is too drunk to drive, Anna takes the wheel, but she crashes the car outside Stephen's gate. Upon finding the accident and William dead, Stephen pulls the deeply shaken Anna from the wreckage and hides her upstairs while he calls the police. Later, he forces himself on her while she is still in shock, then takes her back to her room at the university. He comes by in the morning to find a bemused Charley, who cannot prevent Anna from packing to return to Austria.[10][11]

Cast

[edit]

Cast notes

[edit]

Losey makes a cameo appearance in the film, and Pinter has a brief speaking role as the television producer, Mr. Bell.[13]

Reception

[edit]

In his review upon the film's release, New York Times critic Bosley Crowther called Accident "a sad little story of a wistful don ... neither strong drama nor stinging satire."[14]

Responding to criticism that the film's meaning was difficult to discern, Stanley Baker said: "It's obvious what Accident meant ... It meant what was shown on the screen." Of Joseph Losey's direction, Baker said: "One of Joe's problems is that he tends to wrap things up too much for himself. I think that 75% of the audience didn't realise that Accident was a flashback."[15]

The film performed poorly at the box office.[16] In 1973, Losey said the film was "officially in bankruptcy."[17]

On Rotten Tomatoes, Accident holds a rating of 76% from 29 reviews.[18]

Retrospective appraisal

[edit]

Perhaps the most celebrated sequence in the movie, comprising 25 minutes of the 105 minute film, is set at Stephen and Rosiland's home on a Sunday afternoon. Anna and William are the invited guests, but Charley intrudes on the company unexpectedly.[19] A tennis doubles tennis match is arranged—Stephen and Charley vs. William and Anna—in which Losey reveals, cinematically, the undercurrents of sexual tension among the three men.[20][21][22] Film critic Robert Maris writes:

As in Pinter's plays, the dialogue is often mundane, but conversations are usually loaded with menacing implications or punctuated by lengthy silences. One scene, involving a doubles tennis match, is so laden with psychological tension and jealousy—with piercing glances across the court or a ball hit at an opponent a little too hard—that it seems less a tennis match than some sort of sexual game.[23]

Film critics James Palmer and Michael Riley cite the dialogue from the "deceptively casual, languid scene on the lawn" which follows the tennis match, serving as "a paradigm of reflexive storytelling."[24]

Charley, Stephen's academic colleague, challenges literature student William to create a omniscient narrative for characters in a novel, based on those attending the gathering:

CHARLEY. - Describe what we're all doing. (WILLIAM looks around the garden.)

WILLIAM. ''Rosalind's lying down. Stephen's weeding the garden. Anna's making a daisy chain.
CHARLEY. Good. But you could go further. Rosalind is pregnant. Stephen's having an affair with a girl at Oxford. He's reached the age where he can't keep his hands off the girls at Oxford.
WILLIAM. What?
CHARLEY. But he feels guilty, of course. So he makes up a story.
WILLIAM. What story?
CHARLEY. This story.
WILLIAM. What are you talking about? (CHARLEY sits up and swats violently at flies.)
CHARLEY. Oh, these flies are terrible.
WILLIAM. What flies? There aren't any flies.
CHARLEY. They're Sicilian horse flies, from Corsica.
(CHARLEY shouts across the lawn.) Have you heard our conversation? (STEPHEN weeding).
STEPHEN. Yes! ROSILAND lying, eyes closed.
ROSILAND.Yes

ANNA carefully places daisy chain around CLARISSA’s neck (Rosalind's daughter).[25][26]

Film critic Dan Callahan at Senses of Cinema registers this assessment of Losey's second film collaboration with playwright Harold Pinter:

Accident, though revered by many critics, is a self-conscious art film with a sexy veneer—it evaporates off the screen. Everything about it is oblique, glancing and empty.[27]

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^ Edith de Rham, Joseph Losey, André Deutsch, 1991, p. 180.
  2. ^ a b c Caute, David (1994). Joseph Losey. Oxford University Press. p. 204.
  3. ^ Chapman, J. (2022). The Money Behind the Screen: A History of British Film Finance, 1945-1985. Edinburgh University Press, p. 360, gives the figure as £281,555.
  4. ^ Hirsch, 1980 p. 92: “Losey’s three films with Pinter - The Servant, Accident, The Go-Between…”
    Callahan, 2003: “Harold Pinter, who wrote three screenplays for the director, the first of which was The Servant…”
  5. ^ Nick James (27 June 2007). "Joseph Losey & Harold Pinter: In Search of PoshLust Times". BFI. British Film Institute. Archived from the original on 19 June 2009. Retrieved 19 June 2009. From Venetian decadence and British class war to Proustian time games, the films of Joseph Losey and Harold Pinter gave us a new, ambitious, high-culture kind of art film, says Nick James.
  6. ^ "Festival de Cannes: Accident". festival-cannes.com. Archived from the original on 18 January 2012. Retrieved 2009-03-08.
  7. ^ Palmer and Riley, 1993 p. 162: Filmography
  8. ^ Hirsch, 1980 p. 239: Filmography
  9. ^ Hirsch, 1980 p. 92: “Accident is the most subdued of the trio, a miniaturist examination of middle-aged malaise.”
    Gardner, 2001: “Losey's best film, Accident (1967).”
  10. ^ Hirsch, 1980 p. 52: On the story as a “flashback” And pp. 113-115: Plot summary.
  11. ^ Palmer and Riley, 1993 p. 67: Plot sketch
  12. ^ Carole Caplin interview: "I'm a survivor", The Observer, 13 May 2012.
  13. ^ Maris, 2012: “Losey and Pinter, in fact, briefly appear in the movie, the latter as a cynical television producer.”
  14. ^ Crowther, Bosley (18 April 1967). "'Accident' Opens: Cinema II Has a Movie With Pinter Script". The New York Times.
  15. ^ Blume, Mary (14 August 1971). "Stanley Baker Likes to Act". Los Angeles Times. p. a8.
  16. ^ Brandum, 2017: Accident a “financial failure…”
  17. ^ Barker, Dennis (1 August 1973). "Losey on 'broken promises'". The Guardian. p. 6.
  18. ^ "Accident (1967)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved 23 July 2024.
  19. ^ Callahan, 2003: "Accident (1967)...revered by many critics…"
  20. ^ Palmer and Riley, 1993 p. 76
  21. ^ Hirsch, 1980 p. 114: All three men "infatuated" with Anna.
  22. ^ Brandum, 2017: "Accident (1967)'s dysfunctional masculinity…"
  23. ^ Maris, 2012
  24. ^ Palmer and Riley, 1993 p. 76, p. 77: "...the scene is resonant with ironies generated by and withheld from various characters."
  25. ^ Palmer and Riley, 1993 p. 77
  26. ^ Hirsch, 1980 p. 114-115: Material quoted from this source, not Palmer.
  27. ^ Callahan, 2003

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]