Content deleted Content added
E.M.Gregory (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 59:
:::::: I understand Snopes disproved Horowitz claim re: no-go zones but not re: tension in the community and arson. [[User:Level C|the eloquent peasant]] ([[User talk:Level C|talk]]) 18:50, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
:::::::Why should anyone care about what an unknown investment banker turned satirical film maker living 12000 miles away thinks? If he really were M Moore, it wouldn't grant much significance and M Moore has earned a reputation 1000 times bigger than this guy . If the guy had some expertise on Sweden or terrorism he might be credible, but is even someone as marginal as him REALLY claiming that a minor incident which caused some smoke damage has caused significant community tension in Sweden? Why no Swedish or European sources? ''(The broader influx of refugees perhaps have caused problems, but this article is about Malmo, not refugees in Sweden).''
:::::::I'm afraid when a reporter fabricates the most important parts of his story, nobody cares less about whatever is left. [https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/20/world/europe/trump-pursues-his-attack-on-sweden-with-scant-evidence.html The NYT] and other European sources seemed to think that Sweden was more offended by being used for 'fake news' than it was by the failed arson attempt. As one of the pieces points out, murder rates in the US are at least 5 times those in Sweden. Perhaps that's why the Swedes aren't inclined to take advice from Horowitz or Fox. [[User:Pincrete|Pincrete]] ([[User talk:Pincrete|talk]]) 19:24, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
| |||