The academic community could make rapid progress on quantifying the impacts of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C, but a refocusing of research priorities is needed in order to provide reliable advice.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Report on the structured expert dialogue on the 2013–2015 review FCCC/SB/2015/INF.1 (UNFCCC, 2015).
Tschakert, P. 1. 5 °C or 2 °C: a conduit's view from the science-policy interface at COP20 in Lima, Peru. Climate Change Res. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40665-015-0010-z (2015).
New, M. et al. Four degrees and beyond: the potential for a global temperature increase of four degrees and its implications. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 369, 6–19 (2011).
Fischer, E. & Knutti, R. Anthropogenic contributions to global occurrence of heavy-precipitation and high-temperature extremes. Nature Clim. Change 5, 560–564 (2015).
Schleussner, C. F. et al. Differential climate impacts for policy relevant limits to global warming: the case of 1.5 and 2 °C. Earth Syst. Dynam. 6, 2447–2505 (2015).
Rogelj, J. & Knutti, R. Geoscience after Paris. Nature Geosci. 9, 187–189 (2016).
Peters, G. The best available science to inform 1.5 °C policy choices. Nature Clim Change http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3000 (2016).
Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1029–1136 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Hawkins, E. & Sutton, R. The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 90, 1095–1107 (2009)
Otto, F. E., Frame, D. J., Otto, A. & Allen, M. R. Embracing uncertainty in climate change policy. Nature Clim. Change 5, 917–920 (2015).
Hulme, M. 1. 5 °C and climate change after the Paris Agreement. Nature Clim. Change 6, 222–234 (2016).
Pendergrass, A. G. et al. Does extreme precipitation intensity depend on the emissions scenario? Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 8767–8774 (2015).
Ishizaki, Y. et al. Dependence of precipitation scaling patterns on emissions scenarios for representative concentration pathways. J. Clim. 26, 8868–8879 (2013).
Shiogama, H. et al. Emission scenario dependencies in climate change assessments of the hydrological cycle. Climatic Change 99, 321–329 (2010).
Tebaldi, C. & Arblaster, J. Pattern scaling: its strengths and limitations, and an update on the latest model simulations. Climatic Change 122, 459–471 (2014).
Pal, J. S. & Eltahir, E. Future temperature in southwest Asia projected to exceed a threshold for human adaptability. Nature Clim. Change 6, 197–200 (2015).
Allen, M. Liability for climate change. Nature 421, 891–892 (2003).
Gasser, T. et al. Negative emissions physically needed to keep global warming below 2 °C. Nature commun. 6, 7958 (2015).
James, R. et al. Characterizing loss and damage from climate change. Nature Clim. Change 4, 938–939 (2014).
Acknowledgements
R.A.B. is supported by the European Commission's 7th Framework Programme (EU/FP7) under grant agreement 603864 (HELIX) and the DECC/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme GA01101. D.M. is supported by the ACE-Africa project, P.M.F. is supported by a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award and H.S. is supported by the Program for Risk Information on Climate Change.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mitchell, D., James, R., Forster, P. et al. Realizing the impacts of a 1.5 °C warmer world. Nature Clim Change 6, 735–737 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3055
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3055
