Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-css-text-decor-3-20130801/
Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted
, OutOfScope
,
Invalid
, Rejected
, or Retracted
.
Verified
indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Allow UA to skip ink by default From: Edward O'Connor Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] ⎆ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0088.html ∈ Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/727 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/727#issuecomment-337748467 Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/776c8197d091/css-text-decor/Overview.bs Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0069.html ∈ Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/727#issuecomment-338185006
Issue 2. # Summary: text-decoration-color doesn't handle SVG fills From: Tavmjong Bah Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] ⎆ Response: Closed: Deferred to FXTF Paint Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 3. # Summary: Allow specifying position and thickness of underlines From: Lea Verou Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] ⎆ Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] ⎆ Closed: Deferred to L4 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈
Issue 4. # Summary: Allow arbitrary decorations From: Sebastian Zartner Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAERejNbMCrZiBbCSRjA_1mZ3qOZyQ9PTDoH+TxvX4gp_2eSnpg@mail.gmail.com ⎆ Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDB-xMb46nMf3piNNU_fcyry0hUoKh=WfPmZma3CA=c8Gg@mail.gmail.com ⎆ Closed: Rejected Note: Proposal is way ahead of its time; use cases may be addressed in future specs, unknown as yet which ones. Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈
Issue 5. # Summary: text-shadow should apply to inline images From: Axel Dahmen Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] ⎆ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0087.html ∈ Closed: Rejected Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈
Issue 6. # Summary: Don't underline leading/trailing spaces From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] ⎆ Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3u5pTm7eTDQ-skjhfMA6nfHSewvnrtoYOxXVSj22HxXKw@mail.gmail.com ⎆ Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/dad5fcc900d7/css-text-decor/Overview.bs Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3u5pTm7eTDQ-skjhfMA6nfHSewvnrtoYOxXVSj22HxXKw@mail.gmail.com ⎆ Verified: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3u5pTm7eTDQ-skjhfMA6nfHSewvnrtoYOxXVSj22HxXKw@mail.gmail.com ⎆
Issue 7. # Summary: Error in computed value of 'text-shadow' From: David Baron Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] ⎆ Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDB9UDyk+8v53t5kDjcTsJZJ0E8BFa5RPn3nYqh1=0VgtA@mail.gmail.com ⎆ Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/fe04a357105875cf26b30bf9375c8b310a517524 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 8. # Summary: s/above/outside/ for emphasis marks From: Xidorn Quan Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq698Cn7Yg5+bQO8NN1YrnpZak_yXQVYRc8HUQB3OB0_x9RA@mail.gmail.com ⎆ Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] ⎆ Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/a9432fa2c1e8e80418bcd30538a739854d39a7bd Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 9. # Summary: Clarify position of emphasis marks over auto-hidden ruby From: Xidorn Quan Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0193.html ∈ Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0230.html ∈ Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0116.html ∈ Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Apr/0020.html ∈ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0036.html ∈ Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/cbcdad5472a0 Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/a11c1f2e8f39 Closed: Accepted Resolved: =WG= Resolve. Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0037.html ∈ Notes: See follow-up in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1918
Issue 10. # Summary: Clarify whether emphasis marks are upright or sideways for sideways-rl/lr From: Xidorn Quan Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0285.html ∈ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0089.html ∈ Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/d895ae89479b/css-text-decor/Overview.bs Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈
Issue 11. # Summary: UA rules for text-emphasis-position should handle Japanese within Chinese From: Xidorn Quan Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0311.html ∈ Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] ⎆ Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/51a999522cc2 Closed: Accepted =i18n= Review Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈
Issue 12. # Summary: Are there emphasis mark position preferences for Korean? From: fantasai Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] ⎆ Comment: https://github.com/w3c/klreq/issues/20 Response: https://github.com/w3c/klreq/issues/20#issuecomment-337779644 Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/22c74858f801 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 13. # Summary: Should emphasis marks use 'font-variant: ruby'? From: Xidorn Quan Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq69_efU_tobZe8VDYfM9qCm0ejpiajmmys5JW4h8=oAx4Lg@mail.gmail.com ⎆ Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0094.html ∈ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0111.html ∈ Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/22ed0ceb4192652bcee96c139326acb742b1d868 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/aa9ae9847dcff26d80f2b4d097e0f13781f25a44
Issue 14. # Summary: 'text-emphasis' shorthand should not allow only <color> From: Xidorn Quan Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq699grzUvrZHMHW17bFCE-CamQmfeGgOHN-tB4ViKsWtqTA@mail.gmail.com ⎆ Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq699ztveczAWh1nYZekBoNFUKVz2LCiUUigUSuxV+CuT6HA@mail.gmail.com ⎆ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0355.html ∈ Closed: Rejected Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈ Verified: https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-10-18/#e893598
Issue 15. # Summary: Emphasis marks per typographic character unit From: Richard Ishida Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] ⎆ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0084.html ∈ Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 16. # Summary: Emphasis marks shouldn't apply to punctuation From: Xidorn Quan Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq699v=qhkpXD8smpV0TSOW_GEt67Z4HZWmTheqhv2n+=ekw@mail.gmail.com ⎆ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0083.html ∈ Followup: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/839 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Mar/0021.html ∈ Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html ∈
Issue 17. # Summary: 'text-emphasis-position' requires too many arguments From: Momdo Nakamura Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] ⎆ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0118.html ∈ Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/49463814bb5b/css-text-decor/Overview.bs Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈
Issue 18. # Summary: 'text-underline-position' should default to 'auto' for CJK, to avoid compat issues From: Masayuki Nakano Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] ⎆ Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] ⎆ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0144.html ∈ Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c7ca2e5cf82ddb73a8e58484eeee21750fd32d2e https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/6b29859a1ce2/css-text-decor/Overview.bs Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈
Issue 19. # Summary: 'text-underline-position' UA rules don't handle non-CJK inside CJK From: Myles Maxfield Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0210.html ∈ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0092.html ∈ Changes: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0094.html ∈ Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈
Issue 20. # Summary: Module needs update to handle new sideways-lr/sideways-rl writing modes From: fantasai Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] ⎆ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0119.html ∈ Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/aa9ae9847dcff26d80f2b4d097e0f13781f25a44 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈
Issue 21. # Summary: Specify interaction of text-decoration, text-emphasis, and ruby From: Momdo Nakamura Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq698GTMUd=OBrgaFLcNYWhMdmOtaYa6D-8OrGSbxZZDaibw@mail.gmail.com ⎆ Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/160 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f205ff9dc6b969d015aa37c710b32d3845f137c9 Closed: Accepted Resolved: =WG= Review.
Issue 22. # Summary: CJK vs. skipping ink From: Koji Ishii Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/707 Closed: Deferred Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈
Issue 23. # Summary: ??? From: Christoph Päper Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/799 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/799#issuecomment-290461207 Closed: Invalid
Issue 24. # Summary: line-throughs vs. skipping ink From: Xidorn Quan Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/711 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/711#issuecomment-268594411 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/6d37258d4696972886a18f2298488cf94800060a Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3vcLHbfAhsZi8OCT+kuQOuxt_qH4rimVTewkvNR=SUi=Q@mail.gmail.com ⎆
Issue 25. # Summary: Position of underline should depend on skipped things From: Dave Hyatt Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] ⎆ Closed: Deferred Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈
Issue 26. # Summary: text-decoration-skip should have keyword for complex initial value From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/727 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/843 Closed: Deferred Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈
Issue 27. # Summary: underline-becoming-line-through note is confusing From: Hiroshi Sakakibara Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/160#issuecomment-224203512 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/160#issuecomment-269328826 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0ff76a5ed7ce0e6de7c17ec4b7a357f56fcab3f0 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 28. # Summary: Initial value of text-shadow should be 'currentColor' From: Jonathan Kew Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/942 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/942#issuecomment-281751272 Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/22897f99b2ac/css-text-decor/Overview.bs Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0088.html ∈
Issue 29. # Summary: 'text-underline-position: under' using font metrics conflicts with Arabic/Tibetan From: Richard Ishida Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1055 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1055#issuecomment-337752816 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial Verified: i18n telecon 2018-02-18
Issue 30. # Summary: ink skipping should conform to glyph shapes From: Toby Reif Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1093 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1093#issuecomment-340963541 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/904e554cc193e11ff9338f7d1a3fa0995821dcd7 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0044.html ∈ Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1093#issuecomment-339621321 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1093#issuecomment-364610333
Issue 31. # Summary: interaction of 'display: contents' and text-decoration From: Loirooriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136 Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/b695de85d22b Closed: Accepted
Issue 32. # Summary: Text decoration shouldn't skip Ethiopic word space From: Richard Ishida Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1146 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1146#issuecomment-337783678 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 33. # Summary: Cross-reference 'text-underline-position' from 'text-decoration-line' From: Richard Ishida Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1178 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1178#issuecomment-337790860 Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/7baf02b2c7e3 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 34. # Summary: Questions about `text-emphasis-position` From: Richard Ishida Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1207 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1207#issuecomment-337791679 Closed: Invalid
Issue 35. # Summary: text-shadow canonical order doesn't match impls From: Anthony Ramine Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1485 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1485#issuecomment-318728810 Changes: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/5683d7ffe07b Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 36. # Summary: List Mongolian as `text-underline-position: under right` From: Koji Ishii Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0405.html ∈ Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/type-samples/issues/58
Issue 37. # Summary: Describe text-decoration-style before -color. From: Dennis Heuer Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0066.html ∈ Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 38. # Summary: Add spelling-error and grammar-error styling to text-decoration From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1828 Closed: Deferred to (and accepted in) L4 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0012.html ∈