Dated Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css3-break-20150129/
Editor's Draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-break/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Clarify slicing requirements for monolithic elements From: Håkon Wium Lie Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0233.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial Verified:
Issue 2. # Summary: Slicing/pushing of replaced content should be controllable From: Håkon Wium Lie, Tab Atkins Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0535.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0233.html Closed: Deferred Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0279.html Verified:
Issue 3. # Summary: Replace ASCII diagrams with SVG From: Doug Schepers Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0251.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 4. # Summary: Address line-breaking controls From: Brad Kemper Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0172.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0173.html Closed: Accepted Note: Handled in CSS Text Level 4 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0186.html Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0205.html
Issue 5. # Summary: Grammatical errors From: Brady Duga Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0380.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0214.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html
Issue 6. # Summary: Confusion on break types wrt nested flows From: Brady Duga Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0382.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0218.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html
Issue 7. # Summary: Name of 'any' is confusing From: Brady Duga Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0383.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0305.html Closed: Deferred Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0037.html Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html
Issue 8. # Summary: Multiple principal boxes problematic From: Brady Duga Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0391.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0215.html Closed: Invalid Resolved: Editor's discretion Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html
Issue 9. # Summary: Page progression undefined From: Brady Duga Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0392.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0216.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html
Issue 10. # Summary: Multiple avoidances From: Brady Duga Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0394.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0217.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0228.html Closed: Deferred Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0279.html Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html
Issue 11. # Summary: Breaking rules too specifically defined From: Brady Duga Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0395.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0229.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html
Issue 12. # Summary: Generated content at breaks From: Sanders Kleinfeld Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0102.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0231.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0232.html Closed: Deferred Resolved: Editor's Discretion Verified:
Issue 13. # Summary: box-decoration-break and margins From: Håkon Wium Lie Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0051.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0072.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0230.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0064.html Verified:
Issue 14. # Summary: Drop cloned margins/padding/border if running out of space From: Rossen Atanassov Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0279.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0279.html Verified: Reporter is spec editor
Issue 15. # Summary: Should widows/orphans really have priority over break-* controls? From: fantasai Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0009.html Verified: Reporter is spec editor
Issue 16. # Summary: Clarify effect of 'box-decoration-break' on Shapes and Masking From: Dirk Schulze Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0099.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0223.html Response: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/7d694dd2d77a/css-break/Overview.bs Closed: Accepted
Issue 17. # Summary: Parallel flows independence is too strong From: Peter Moulder Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0158.html Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0353.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0013.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: =WG= Discuss
Issue 18. # Summary: Editorial nits From: Peter Moulder Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0170.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0148.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 19. # Summary: CSS Fragmentation should absorb CSSOM details for fragmented boxes From: Alan Stearns Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0140.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0154.html Closed: OutOfScope Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0085.html Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0085.html
Issue 20. # Summary: Shorthand expansion into longhands breaks getPropertyCSSValue From: Peter Moulder Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0157.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0149.html Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor's discretion
Issue 21. # Summary: Breaks within inline-blocks From: François Remy Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0227.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0133.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0134.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0085.html
Issue 22. # Summary: Clarify that fragments have border-boxes From: Robert O'Callahan Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Dec/0465.html Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0071.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 23. # Summary: Guaranteeing progress From: David Baron Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0146.html Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0153.html Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0085.html
Issue 24. # Summary: Prefix 'page' and 'column' and 'region' break keywords with 'force-*' From: Theresa O'Connor Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0037.html Closed: Retracted Resolved: TPAC 2015