Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Molluscicidal effectiveness of Luo-Wei, a novel plant-derived molluscicide, against Oncomelania hupensis, Biomphalaria alexandrina and Bulinus truncatus

Infectious Diseases of Poverty volume 8, Article number: 27 (2019) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 06 June 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Control of snail intermediate hosts has been proved to be a fast and efficient approach for interrupting the transmission of schistosomiasis. Some plant extracts have shown obvious molluscicidal activity, and a new compound Luo-Wei, also named tea-seed distilled saponin (TDS), was developed based on the saponins extracted from Camellia oleifera seeds. We aimed to test the molluscicidal activity of 4% TDS against the intermediate host snails in China and Egypt, and evaluate its environmental safety to non-target organisms.

Methods

In the laboratory, Oncomelania hupensis, Biomphalaria alexandrina and Bulinus truncatus were exposed to 4% TDS, and the median lethal concentration (LC50) was estimated at 24, 48 and 72 h. In the field, snail mortalities were assessed 1, 2, 3 and 7 d post-immersion with 2.5 g/m3 4% TDS and 1, 3, 7 and 15 d post-spraying with 5 g/m2 4% TDS. In addition, the acute toxicity of 4% TDS to Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica), zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio) and freshwater shrimp (Macrobrachium nipponense) was assessed by estimations of LC50 or median lethal dose (LD50).

Results

In the laboratory, the LC50 values of 4% TDS for O. hupensis were 0.701, 0.371 and 0.33 mg/L at 24, 48 and 72 h, respectively, and 4% TDS showed a 1.975 mg/L 24 h LC50 against B. alexandrina, and a 1.396 mg/L 24 h LC50 against B. truncatus. Across all study regions, the pooled mortalities of O. hupensis were 72, 86, 94 and 98% at 1, 2, 3 and 7 d, following field immersion of 4% TDS at a dose of 2.5 g/m3, and were 69, 77, 85 and 88% at 1, 3, 7 and 15 d, following field spraying at 5 g/m2, respectively. 4% TDS had moderate toxicity to Japanese quail (7 d LD50 > 60 mg/kg) and to shrimp (96 h LC50 = 6.28 mg/L; 95% CI: 3.53–11.2 mg/L), whereas its toxicity to zebrafish was high (96 h LC50 = 0.15 mg/L; 95% CI: 0.14–0.17 mg/L).

Conclusions

4% TDS is active against O. hupensis, B. alexandrina and B. truncatus under laboratory and field conditions, and it may be a candidate molluscicide of plant origin.

Multilingual abstracts

Please see Additional file 1 for translations of the abstract into the five official working languages of the United Nations.

Background

Schistosomiasis is one of the most widespread parasitic infections and the second most prevalent parasitic disease in the world in terms of overall morbidity, socioeconomic and public health importance [1]. The three major species of schistosomes that infect humans, including Schistosoma japonicum, S. mansoni and S. haematobium, are transmitted by specific genera of snails, i.e., Oncomelania spp., Biomphalaria spp., and Bulinus spp., respectively [1]. Parasitic Schistosoma infections in humans depend absolutely on the local presence of their intermediate freshwater snail hosts [1]. Molluscicide-based control of snail intermediate hosts is a fast and efficient approach for interrupting the transmission of this parasite [2, 3]. Niclosamide has been recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a molluscicide since the 1960s and is still the molluscicide of choice [4]. However, the synthetic chemical molluscicides typically used to control these snails are expensive and can be toxic to other living organisms in the snail environmental habitat. Recent phytochemical screening has indicated that many plants are endowed with pesticidal properties that can be harnessed cheaply for vector control [5], and plant extracts have been studied as alternatives to chemical molluscicides [6, 7].

A new molluscicide has been discovered from an alternative botanical source, Camellia oleifera, which is widely cultivated in South China. The seeds of this plant can be pressed to yield edible tea oil (camellia oil), and its byproduct, tea seed pomace, is normally discarded as waste or is used as a natural detergent or organic fertilizer with limited economic value. However, there are about 8% crude saponins in tea seed pomace that show significant biological and pharmacological activities [8, 9]. During the 2000s, a new compound was developed by alkaline hydrolysis and purification of the saponins extracted from the tea seed pomace, termed tea-seed distilled saponin (TDS) [10, 11], for which the registered chemical name at the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) is (3β, 16α)-28-oxo-D -xylopyranose-(1 → 3)-O-β-D-pyran-(1 → 4)-O-6-deoxy-α-L-mannopyranosyl-(1 → 2)- β-D-xylopyranose-17-hydroxymethyl-16,21,22-trihydroxyoleanolic-12-alkene (C52H84O24, MW 1093.23; Fig. 1). As pentacyclic triterpenoid saponins (PTSs), the pretest showed that the technical material of TDS (91.6%) was active against O. hupensis snails (Additional file 2: Table S1). Listed as a new plant-derived molluscicide, its common name was registered as Luo-Wei (which means “snail threatener” in Chinese) by the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) of People’s Republic of China in 2007, and the 4% powder formulation of TDS (4% TDS) was approved for pesticide use in China by the MoA in 2008. In the present report, we aimed to assess the molluscicidal activity of 4% TDS against the intermediate host snails of schistosomes in the laboratory and the field, and evaluate the environmental safety of 4% TDS to non-target organisms.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Structural formula of TDS (Luo-Wei) and its chemical name. TDS (C52H84O24, molecular weight 1093.23) is a pentacyclic triterpenoid saponin extracted from the tea seed pomace (Camellia oleifera) that is left after commercial pressing of seeds for tea oil. Its chemical name listed at the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) is(3β, 16α)-28-oxo-D-xylopyranose-(1 → 3)-O -β-D-pyran-(1 → 4)-O-6-deoxy-α-L-mannopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-β-D-xylopyranose-17 -hydroxymethyl-16, 21, 22-trihydroxyoleanolic-12-alkene

Full size image

Methods

Laboratory molluscicidal activity test

To test the molluscicidal activity of 4% TDS against O. hupensis in the laboratory, O. hupensis snails were collected from the marshland in Yangzhou City, Jiangsu Province along the Yangtze River basin, and were given indoor feeding for 1 week before testing. Active and mature snails were selected for testing, and 4% TDS were prepared to give 9 concentrations of 0.04, 0.08, 0.16, 0.31, 0.63, 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 mg/L in the dechlorinated tap water. Then, 10 snails were exposed to each concentration for 24, 48 and 72 h at a room temperature of 25 ± 1 °C, respectively, and snails immersed in dechlorinated tap water served as controls. They were rinsed with dechlorinated water and incubated for a further 48 h to determine whether they were dead or alive.

To test the activity of 4% TDS against B. alexandrina and B. truncatus snails in the laboratory, these snail species were collected from water bodies in Giza governorate, Egypt, transferred to the laboratory, washed, and examined for natural trematode infections. Healthy non-infected snails were maintained at the Department of Medical Malacology, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (TBRI), Egypt, in plastic aquaria provided with dechlorinated tap water (10 snails/L, 25 ± 1 °C) for at least 3 weeks before tests, and 4% TDS were formulated to concentrations of 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 2.75 mg/L in dechlorinated tap water. Ten snails were exposed to each concentration for 24, 48 and 72 h at a room temperature of 25 ± 1 °C, respectively, and snails immersed in dechlorinated tap water served as controls. They were rinsed with dechlorinated water and incubated for a further 48 h to determine whether they were dead or alive. All tests were repeated in triplicate, and the median lethal concentration (LC50) was calculated [12].

Field assessment of molluscicidal activity

During the period between 2011 and 2014, field assessment of 4% TDS against O. hupensis was conducted in provinces that were endemic for S. japonicum in China, including Hunan, Hubei, Jiangxi, Anhui, Jiangsu, Sichuan, and Yunnan (Fig. 2). Snail-inhabited ditches and plots with densities of living snails > 10 snails per 0.1 m2 (33 cm × 33 cm) were selected for immersion and spraying tests, respectively. The recommended temperature for application was 18–35 °C and relative humidity 50–80% in the field, without heavy rain. The field experiment was repeated if the snail mortality was more than 10% in the blank control group [13].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of the study areas to test the field molluscicidal efficacy of 4% TDS against Oncomelania hupensis in China. During the period between 2011 and 2014, field assessment of 4% TDS against O. hupensis was conducted in provinces that were endemic for S. japonicum in China, including Hunan, Hubei, Jiangxi, Anhui, Jiangsu, Sichuan, and Yunnan

Full size image

In the immersion test, the selected irrigation ditches were separated by non-water partitions (> 1 m), and each section was more than 40 m of length with at least 30 m3 of water volume. The upper section was for the water-only control group and the lower section was for the 4% TDS or 50% wettable powder of niclosamide ethanolamine salt (WPN; Nantong Luosen Chemical Co. Ltd., Nantong, China) treatment group. The dose concentrations tested were 2.5 g/m3 for 4% TDS and 2 g/m3 for 50% WPN. Each ditch section was topped up to test volume by pumping water to maintain water level after the vegetation clearance. The active mature snails from the same field were selected and packed into 18 nylon bags (50 snails/bag). In each treatment group, three monitoring sites were set equidistantly with each site of three bags of snails. A bag was taken from each site for mortality observation 1, 2, 3 and 7 d post-immersion.

In the spraying test, a flat plot of snail habitats was selected in the lake marshland, river floodplain, or mountain terrace and divided into three sections, one for the 4% TDS group (≥ 3000 m2), one for 50% WPN(≥ 3000 m2), and the other for the water-only control area (≥ 600 m2), with a spacing distance of > 10 m between groups. The vegetation was cut to under 10 cm and removed before spraying. The dose concentrations were 5 g/m2 for 4% TDS and 2 g/m2 for 50% WPN. Snail mortalities were observed 1, 3, 7 and 15 d post-spraying.

Ecotoxicological test of 4% TDS

Environmental safety assessment of 4% TDS for non-target organisms, including birds, fish, and aquatic invertebrates, were conducted according to the Test Guidelines on Environmental Safety Assessment for Chemical Pesticides [14]. Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica), zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio) and freshwater shrimp (Macrobrachium nipponense) were selected as representative Chinese animals for these acute toxicity tests. A single dose gavage method was used to evaluate the acute toxicity of 4% TDS to Japanese quail. Five treatment groups (including five dose levels of 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 mg/kg body weight of 4% TDS) with a blank control were applied, of which each group consisted of 10 birds (5 males and 5 females). After dosing, toxic signs and mortalities were continuously observed and recorded at 1, 2, 3, and 7 d. In the test of acute aquatic toxicity, 10 freshwater fish or shrimp were used at each test concentration and in the controls (0, 0.04, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20 and 0.40 mg/L in zebrafish and 0, 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 mg/L in shrimps, respectively), complying with the semi-static procedure (renewal of the test solution every 24 h). The fish or shrimp were exposed to the test substance for a period of 96 h. Mortalities were recorded at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h and the LC50 or the median lethal dose (LD50) values were calculated [12].

Statistical analysis

All LC50 or LD50 values and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), probit/log concentration regression equations, and slope were calculated using the Bliss’s probit method with the computer program PoloPlus version 1.0 (LeOra Software; Petaluma, CA, USA) [12, 15]. Parameters for data files analyzed by PoloPlus were as follows: probit model, concentrations converted to logarithms, and no natural response [15]. The parallel and equal hypothesis tests of probit mortality lines were done and the 95% CI of lethal concentration ratios (LCRs) were calculated to compare the susceptibility of different snail species to 4% TDS [16]. If the 95% CI of LCR included 1, the LCRs were not considered significantly different.

A chi-square test was used to examine the differences of mortalities between time points after immersing and spraying. Open Meta-analyst software (Brown University; Providence, RI, USA) was used to make a pooled estimate of snail mortality and compare the difference of molluscicidal activity against O. hupensis snails between 4% TDS and 50% WPN using relative risk (RR) calculation [17]. Significance of this comparison was determined only if 1 was not included in the 95% CI of the observed RR. The likelihood ratio (LR) and LCR at 50% response level were calculated, and a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Laboratory molluscicidal activity

In the laboratory, the LC50 values for 4% TDS with their respective 95% CIs and slopes for each snail populations are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 3a–c. The LC50 values differed significantly among snail species and depending on treatment duration (Table 1 and Additional file 2: Table S2 and S3). With longer duration of exposure, the LC50 values of 4% TDS against O. hupensis decreased from 0.701 (0.581–0.842) mg/L at 24 h, to 0.371 (0.315–0.436) mg/L at 48 h, and to 0.33 (0.284–0.385) mg/L at 72 h, respectively. The log concentration-probit mortality curves for 24 h exposure were significantly different among snail species (the equality tested by LR: χ2 = 206, P < 0.05; the parallelism by LR: χ2 = 39.57, P < 0.05) (Fig. 3d). The lowest lethal concentration of snail populations at 24 h exposure was observed for O. hupensis, for which LC50 was nearly three-fold lower than that of B. alexandrina (1.975 mg/L) or B. truncatus (1.396 mg/L), with observed LCR50 (O. hupensis/B. alexandrina/B. truncatus) of 0.355 (95% CI: 0.293–0.43) and 0.502 (95% CI: 0.414–0.609), respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 Molluscicidal activity of 4% TDS against Oncomelania hupensis, Biomphalaria alexandrina and Bulinus truncatus by the immersion test in the laboratory
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Dose-response curves of Oncomelania hupensis, Biomphalaria alexandrina, and Bulinus truncatus snails subjected to aqueous dilutions of 4% TDS for 24 h. a Oncomelania hupensis; b Biomphalaria alexandrina; c Bulinus truncatus; d The equality and parallelism of the regression lines of different snail species after 24 h exposure, tested by LR. O. h., Oncomelania hupensis; B. a., Biomphalaria alexandrina; B. t., Bulinus truncatus. The equality of the regression lines were tested using the likelihood ratio (LR). In general, there are significant differences between slopes and intercepts of lines (χ2 = 206, P < 0.05). The parallelism of slopes is tested by the LR. In general, there are significant differences between the regression lines (χ2 = 39.6, P < 0.05)

Full size image

Field molluscicidal activity

Across all schistosomiasis-endemic regions selected for the field assessment of 4% TDS activity, the pooled mortalities of O. hupensis were 72% (95% CI: 56.7–86.6%), 86% (95% CI: 78.8–92.2%), 94% (95% CI: 89.6–97.7%) and 98% (95% CI: 95.7–99.9%) 1, 2, 3, and 7 d post-immersion, respectively (Fig. 4a and Additional file 2: Table S4) [18]. In comparison to the effects of 50% WPN treatment, the pooled effect of 4% TDS were lower than 50% WPN at 1, 2 and 3 d but not significantly different at 7 d post-immersion (Fig. 4b–e): the calculated 4% TDS/50% WPN RR values for snail mortality were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.677–0.969), 0.9 (95% CI: 0.844–0.959), 0.958 (95% CI: 0.927–0.989) and 0.991 (95% CI: 0.975–1.006) at 1, 2, 3 and 7 d post-immersion, respectively (Fig. 4b–e).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Molluscicidal effect of 4% TDS by immersion in the field. a Mortality of Oncomelania hupensis post-exposure to 4% TDS by immersion in the field. Danling_1, conducted in the ditch; Danling_2, conducted in the paddy field. b–e Comparison of Oncomelania hupensis mortalities (individual and pooled results) between TDS (2.5 g/m3) and WPN (2 g/m3) 1 (b), 2 (c), 3 (d) and 7 d (e) post-immersion in the field, studies performed 2011 to 2013. There is no significant difference in the pooled effects between TDS and WPN 7 d post-immersion (e), of which the relative risk values (TDS/WPN) for snail mortality was 0.991 (95% CI: 0.975–1.006)

Full size image

Field conditions of the spraying trials are summarized in Additional file 2: Table S5. Across all regions, the pooled mortalities of O. hupensis were 69% (95% CI: 54.8–82.9%), 77% (95% CI: 69.4–85.4%), 85% (95% CI: 80.6–88.6%) and 88% (95 CI: 85.8–90.3%) 1, 3, 7 and 15 d post-spraying with 4% TDS, respectively (Fig. 5a and Additional file 2: Table S6). In comparison to 50% WPN treatment, the pooled effects of 4% TDS application were lower than those of WPN at 1 and 3 d but not significantly different at 7 and 15 d post-spraying (Fig. 5b–e): the pooled estimates of 4% TDS/50% WPN RR for snail mortality were 0.925 (95% CI: 0.862–0.993), 0.932 (95% CI: 0.869–0.998), 0.968 (95% CI: 0.917–1.021) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.952–1.030) at 1, 3, 7 and 15 d post-spraying, respectively (Fig. 5b–e and Additional file 2: Table S6).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Molluscicidal effect of 4% TDS by spraying in the field. a, Mortalities of Oncomelania hupensis post-exposure by ground spraying of 4% TDS in the field. b–e Comparison of Oncomelania hupensis mortalities (individual and pooled results) between TDS (5 g/m2) and WPN (2 g/m2) 1 (b), 3 (c), 7 (d) and 15 d (e) post-spraying in the field, studies performed 2011 to 2013. There is no significant difference in the pooled effects between TDS and WPN at 7 d (d) and 15 d (e) post-spraying, of which the relative risk values (TDS/WPN) for snail mortality are 0.968 (95% CI: 0.917–1.021) at 7 d and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.952–1.030) at 15 d, respectively

Full size image

Ecotoxicological activity of 4% TDS

Four percent TDS had moderate toxicity to quail (7 d LD50 > 60 mg/kg) and to shrimp (96 h LC50 = 6.28 mg/L; 95% CI: 3.53–11.2 mg/L), whereas its toxicity to zebrafish was high (96 h LC50 = 0.15 mg/L; 95% CI: 0.14–0.17 mg/L) (Table 2).

Table 2 Ecotoxicological tests of 4% TDS against Coturnix japonica, Brachydanio rerio and Macrobrachium nipponense
Full size table

Discussion

Currently, targeted mass delivery of anti-schistosomal drug therapy is the most common method used by national and regional schistosomiasis control programs across the world [1]. However, this approach has an important limitation: people at risk of infections who miss or decline treatment remain infected and continue to contribute to local transmission of Schistosoma parasites [19]. Multiyear experiences in mass treatment campaigns indicate that population participation declines over time, and further suggest that drug efficacy may be lower for those residents who continue to be infected after multiple rounds of treatment [20]. There is a need for additional practical interventions that can interrupt the process of parasite transmission [21]. In particular, there is a need for more selective and efficient molluscicides for control the snail intermediate hosts of this parasite [22].

In this regard, the present work describes the mollusciciding compound, 4% TDS, which is extracted from the plant C. oleifera, as a promising molluscicidal agent against O. hupensis, B. alexandrina, and B. truncatus, the snail intermediate hosts of the most common Schistosoma parasites of humans. This corresponds to the previously described molluscicidal activity of crude saponins extracted from C. oleifera seeds that has been shown for mollusk control in other pesticide test studies around the world [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Saponins are naturally occurring plant glycosides with a sugar moiety and an aglycone unit [29]. There is a high correlation between plants employed as fish poisons or soap substances and their molluscicidal activity [30]. Of note, it is known that the saponins from Phytolacca dodecandra or Alternanthera philoxeroides that are monodesmosidic (having a sugar moiety only at position C-3) possess a toxic activity, whereas bidesmosidic saponins (having a sugar moiety both at C-3 and C-28) are inactive [30,31,32].

For schistosomiasis control, niclosamide, the molluscicide used most frequently at present, has poor water solubility and has the disadvantage that it can stimulate O. hupensis snails to climb out of treated water to escape the chemical application, resulting in a reduction of the net molluscicidal effect [33]. Although TDS has a relatively lower lethal effect on snails, it, or other triterpenoid saponins, could be used as synergistic agents with currently available synthetic molluscicides.

The high molluscicidal activity of P. dodecandra is due to the presence of monodesmosidic saponin with an oleanolic acid glucoside base in the pericarp of the immature fruit of the plant P. dodecandra [34, 35]. Similarly, the high concentrations of saponins and flavonoids in the plants Sesbania sesban, Euphorbia splendens, Cestrum purpureum, and Yucca filamentosa “Marginata” contribute to their remarkable toxicity to B. alexandrina snails [36,37,38,39]. The toxicity of 4% TDS to snails may be due to their properties as protease inhibitors and their ability to interact with cholesterol, which produces insoluble substances that alter cellular activities, thereby resulting in cytotoxicity and death of the treated organisms [40].

The descending order of susceptibility of O. hupensis, B. truncatus and B. alexandrina snails to the toxic effects of 24 h exposure to 4% TDS is in parallel to previous results using P. dodecandra against O. nosophora, B. truncatus, and B. glabrata [41]. In comparable studies, B. truncatus was more susceptible than B. alexandrina to the toxic action of extracts from the plants Euphorbia pseudocactus and E. helioscopia [41]. It is therefore hypothesized that the variations in snail susceptibility to 4% TDS could be due to species differences in metabolic and physiological activities, including respiratory enzymes, protein and carbohydrate synthesis, and/or steroid sex hormone effects in treated snails [42, 43].

From the present work, the acute oral toxicity of 4% TDS to Japanese quail and shrimp was moderate. However, like niclosamide and P. dodecandra, 4% TDS can be lethal to zebrafish [44,45,46]. Because of the toxicity to aquatic species, 4% TDS should be cautiously used in water bodies.

Our study has several limitations. First, the activity of 4% TDS against B. alexandrina and B. truncatus were tested at only one time point (24 h), and further studies to assess the molluscicidal effect at long duration are required. Second, the field molluscicidal effect of 4% TDS against B. alexandrina and B. truncatus was not examined. This is because both B. alexandrina and B. truncatus are aquatic, and it is very difficult to perform a field assessment.

Conclusions

The results of the present study demonstrate that 4% TDS is active against O. hupensis, B. alexandrina and B. truncatus under laboratory and field conditions, and it may be a candidate molluscicide of plant origin. Since snail control has been shown to be the most effective way to reduce schistosomiasis incidence and has been recommended to be included in global guidelines and national schistosomiasis control strategies [47, 48], it is therefore suggested that 4% TDS should be further tested for efficacy within operational research for schistosomiasis control in order to determine its ability to sustain the impact of chemotherapy in an integrated approach to controlling this highly prevalent parasitic disease [49].

Change history

  • 06 June 2019

    .

Abbreviations

CDC:

Center for Disease Control and Prevention

CI :

confidence interval

IUPAC:

International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry

JIPD:

Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases

LC50 :

Median lethal concentration

LCR:

Lethal concentration ratio

MOA:

Ministry of Agriculture

PTS:

Pentacyclic triterpenoid saponin

RR:

Relative risk

TDS:

Tea-seed distilled saponin

WHO:

World Health Organization

WPN:

Wettable powder of niclosamide ethanolamine salt

References

  1. Evan SW. Water-based interventions for schistosomiasis control. Pathog Glob Health. 2014;108:246–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. King CH, Bertsch D. Historical perspective: snail control to prevent schistosomiasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0003657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. King CH, Sutherland LJ, Bertsch D. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of chemical-based mollusciciding for control of Schistosoma mansoni and S haematobium transmission. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang GJ, Li W, Sun LP, Wu F, Yang K, Huang YX, Zhou XN. Molluscicidal efficacies of different formulations of niclosamide: result of meta-analysis of Chinese literature. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sola P, Mvumi BM, Ogendo JO, Mponda O, Kamanula JF, Nyirenda SP, Belmain SR, Stevenson PC. Botanical pesticide production, trade and regulatory mechanisms in sub-Saharan Africa: making a case for plant-based pesticidal products. Food Secur. 2014;6:369–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. WHO/TDR. Report of the Scientific Working Group on Plant Molluscicides. TDR/SCH-SWG(4)/83.3, WHO, 1983.

  7. Kloos H, McCullough FS. Plant molluscicides. Planta Med. 1982;46:195–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao P, Gao DF, Xu M, Shi ZG, Wang D, Yang CR, Zhang Y. Triterpenoid saponins from the genus Camellia. Chem Biodivers. 2011;8:1931–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen YF, Yang CH, Chang MS, Ciou YP, Huang YC. Foam properties and detergent abilities of the saponins from Camellia oleifera. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11:4417–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu RH, Wei TE, Yuan H, Zhang NM. Study on the purification of tea saponin. Appl Chem Industry. 2007;36:649–50 659.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yuan H, Liu RH, Zhang NM. A simple method for purfication of crude tea saponin. Chin J Bioprocess Eng. 2008;6:18–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Finney DJ. The median lethal dose and its estimation. Arch Toxicol. 1985;56:215–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ministry of Agriculture. Efficacy test methods and evaluation of Molluscicide for pesticide registration (NY/T 1617–2008). Beijing: China Agricultural Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ministry of Agriculture. Test guidelines on environmental safety assessment for chemical pesticides. Beijing: China Zhijian Publishing House; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robertson JL, Preisler HK, Russel RM. PoloPlus Probit and logit analysis-user’s guide. Berkeley: LeOra Software; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wheeler MW, Park RM, Bailer AJ. Comparing median lethal concentration values using confidence interval overlap or ratio tests. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2006;25:1441–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wallace BC, Schmid CH, Lau J, Trikalinos TA. Meta-analyst: software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Samartzis D, Perera R. Meta-analysis: statistical methods for binary data pooling. Spine J. 2009;9:424–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Inobaya MT, Chau TN, Ng SK, MacDougall C, Olveda RM, Tallo VL, Landicho JM, Malacad CM, Aligato MF, Guevarra JB, Ross AG. Mass drug administration and the sustainable control of schistosomiasis: an evaluation of treatment compliance in the rural Philippines. Parasit Vector. 2018;11:441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Secor WE. Early lessons from schistosomiasis mass drug administration programs. F1000Res. 2015;4: F1000 Faculty Rev:1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McManus DP, Dunne DW, Sacko M, Utzinger J, Vennervald BJ, Zhou XN. Schistosomiasis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. World Health Organization. First WHO report on neglected tropical diseases 2010: working to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases (WHO ISBN 9789241564090), 2010.

  23. Olivier HM, Jenkins JA, Berhow M, Carter J. A pilot study testing a natural and a synthetic molluscicide for controlling invasive apple snails (Pomacea maculata). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2016;96:289–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Seamans TW, Blackwell BF, Bernhardt GE, Potter DA. Assessing chemical control of earthworms at airports. Wildlife Soc Bull. 2015;39:434–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kijprayoona S, Tolieng V, Petsoma A, Chaicharoenpong C. Molluscicidal activity of Camellia oleifera seed meal. Sci Asia. 2014;40:393–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. González-Cruz D, Martin RS. Molluscicidal effects of saponin-rich plant extracts on the grey field slug. Cien Inv Agr. 2013;40:341–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen YZ, Ma L, Liu ZC, Peng SF, Chen XL, Chen LS, Wang XN, Wang R. Molluscicidal effect of Camellia oleifera saponin. J Central South Univ Fores Techn. 2011;31:147–50.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xian ZH, Jia DT, Han W, Ai HJ. Effect of tea saponin on growth of apple snail (Pomacea canaliculata) at different developmental stages. J South Agr. 2012;43:1129–34.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rao AV, Gurfinkel DM. The bioactivity of saponins: triterpenoid and steroidal glycosides. Drug Metabol Drug Interact. 2000;17:211–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Singh SK, Yadav RP, Singh A. Molluscicides from some common medicinal plants of eastern Uttar Pradesh. India J Appl Toxicol. 2010;30:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hostettmann K, Kizu H, Tomimori T. Molluscicidal properties of various saponins. Planta Med. 1982;44:34–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao WM, Qin WG, Xu RS. Molluscicidal saponins from Alternanthera philoxeroides. Nat Prod Res Dev. 1999;11:1–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Dai JR, Wang W, Liang YS, Li HJ, Guan XH, Zhu YC. A novel molluscicidal formulation of niclosamide. Parasitol Res. 2008;103:405–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lemma A. Laboratory and field evaluation of the molluscicidal properties of Phytolacca dodecandra. Bull World Health Organ. 1970;42:597–612.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Baalawy SS. Laboratory evaluation of the molluscicidal potency of a butanol extract of Phytolacca dodecandra (endod) berries. Bull World Health Organ. 1972;47:422–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Dorsaz AC, Hostettmann M, Hostettmann K. Molluscicidal saponins from Sesbania sesban. Planta Med. 1988;54:225–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Schall VT, de Vasconcellos MC, Villaça-Coelho AL, Ferreira-Lopes FE, da Silva IP. Evaluation of temporal, seasonal and geographic stability of the molluscicidal property of Euphorbia splendens latex. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1992;34:183–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hamed M, El-Amin S, Abdel-Fattah AS. Molluscicidal activity of some constituents isolated from Cestrum purpureum. Pharmacology. 2015;2:59–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hamed M, El-Amin S, Abdel-Fattah AS. Isolation and identification of some compounds from molluscicidaly active plant Yucca filamentosa “Marginata”. Pharmacologyonline. 2015;1:19–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Chaieb I. Saponins as insecticides: a review. Tunisian J Plant Prot. 2010;5:39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Thiilborg ST, Cornett C, Lemmich E. Investigations of molluscicidal saponins from the Endod plant Phytolacca dodecandra. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1996;404:151–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Dai JR, Li YZ, Wang W, Xing YT, Qu GL, Liang YS. Resistance to niclosamide in Oncomelania hupensis, the intermediate host of Schistosoma japonicum: should we be worried? Parasitology. 2015;142:332–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Dai J, Li Y, Wang W, Xing Y, Qu G, Liang Y. Sensitivity of Oncomelania hupensis to niclosamide: a nation-wide survey in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11:3086–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Monkiedje A, Anderson AC, Englande AJ. Acute toxicity of Phytolacca dodecandra (Endod-S) and niclosamide to snails, Schistosoma mansoni cercaria, Tilapia fish, and soil microorganisms. Environ Toxicol. 1991;6:405–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang F, Dai JR. Assessment studies of niclosamide's toxicological safety: an overview. Chin J Zoon. 2013;29:86–90 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lambert JD, Temmink JH, Marquis J, Parkhurst RM, Lugt CB, Lemmich E, Wolde-Yohannes L, de Savigny D. Endod: safety evaluation of a plant molluscicide. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1991;14:189–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Lo NC, Gurarie D, Yoon N, Coulibaly JT, Bendavid E, Andrews JR, King CH. Impact and cost-effectiveness of snail control to achieve disease control targets for schistosomiasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:E584–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Sokolow SH, Wood CL, Jones IJ, Swartz SJ, Lopez M, Hsieh MH, Lafferty KD, Kuris AM, Rickards C, De Leo GA. Global assessment of schistosomiasis control over the past century shows targeting the snail intermediate host works best. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ross AG, Chau TN, Inobaya MT, Olveda RM, Li Y, Harn DA. A new global strategy for the elimination of schistosomiasis. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;54:130–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to numerous field and laboratory staff for data collection and processing.

Funding

This study was funded by the grants from the National Science and Technology Pillar Program (grant No. 2009BAI78B07 and 2009BAI78B04), National S & T Major Program (grant No. 2012ZX10004–220), Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (grant No. 11XD1405400), Jiangsu Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission (grant No. QNRC2016621 and H2018097), Wuxi Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology (grant No. CSE31N1730) and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Availability of data and materials

All datasets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available upon request by contact with the corresponding authors.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Tie-Wu Jia and Wei Wang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, 200025, China

    Tie-Wu Jia, Shan Lv & Xiao-Nong Zhou

  2. Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, Shanghai, 200025, China

    Tie-Wu Jia, Shan Lv & Xiao-Nong Zhou

  3. WHO Collaborating Centre for Tropical Diseases, Shanghai, 200025, China

    Tie-Wu Jia, Shan Lv & Xiao-Nong Zhou

  4. National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, Ministry of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200025, China

    Tie-Wu Jia, Shan Lv & Xiao-Nong Zhou

  5. Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, 200025, China

    Tie-Wu Jia, Shan Lv & Xiao-Nong Zhou

  6. Communicable Diseases Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa (WHO/AFRO), PO Box 06, Brazzaville, Congo

    Tie-Wu Jia

  7. Key Laboratory of National Health Commission on Parasitic Disease Control and Prevention, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory on Parasites and Vector Control Technology, Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Wuxi, 214064, China

    Wei Wang, Le-Ping Sun & Kun Yang

  8. Hubei Jinhaichao Science & Technology Co., Ltd, Wuhan, 430206, China

    Neng-Min Zhang

  9. Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, 430079, China

    Xi-Bao Huang, Jian-Bing Liu & Han-Cheng Liu

  10. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan, 430200, China

    Rui-Hua Liu

  11. Department of Medical Malacology, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (TBRI), Imbaba, Giza, 12411, Egypt

    Fathia A. Gawish, Mohamed R. Habib & Mohamed A. El-Emam

  12. Center for Global Health and Diseases, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Charles H. King

  13. Schistosomiasis Consortium for Operational Research and Evaluation, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

    Charles H. King

Authors
  1. Tie-Wu Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Le-Ping Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shan Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kun Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Neng-Min Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xi-Bao Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jian-Bing Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Han-Cheng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Rui-Hua Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Fathia A. Gawish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Mohamed R. Habib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Mohamed A. El-Emam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Charles H. King
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Xiao-Nong Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CHK and XNZ conceived and designed the study. TWJ, LPS, SL, KY, XBH, JBL, HCL, RHL and WW performed the laboratory and field experiments in China. FAG, MRH and MAE performed the experiments in Egypt. NMZ provided authorized technical files. TWJ, LPS, FAG, MRH and MAE collected the experimental data, conducted data analysis and created figures and tables. TWJ and WW drafted the first version of the manuscript. CHK and XNZ revised the manuscript. WW completed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Charles H. King or Xiao-Nong Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors consent for publication of this manuscript.

Competing interests

Prof. Xiao-Nong Zhou is the Editor-in-Chief of Infectious Diseases of Poverty.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: In the abstract of original publication of the article [1], 0.33 mg/L (24 h LC50 against B. alexandrina) should be replaced by 1.975 mg/L which was clearly showed in Table 1.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Multilingual abstracts in the five official working languages of the United Nations. (PDF 632 kb)

Additional file 2:

Table S1. Mortality of Oncomelania hupensis by immersion test using 91.6% TDS. Table S2. Mortalities of Oncomelania hupensis by immersion with 4% TDS in the lab. Table S3. Mortalities of Biomphalaria alexandrina and Bulinus truncatus by immersion with 4% TDS in the lab. Table S4. Comparison of Oncomelania hupensis mortalities between TDS and WPN by immersion in the field. Table S5. Field conditions of the spraying test. Table S6. Comparison of Oncomelania hupensis mortalities between TDS and WPN by spraying in the field. (DOCX 45 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, TW., Wang, W., Sun, LP. et al. Molluscicidal effectiveness of Luo-Wei, a novel plant-derived molluscicide, against Oncomelania hupensis, Biomphalaria alexandrina and Bulinus truncatus. Infect Dis Poverty 8, 27 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-019-0535-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-019-0535-7

Keywords

Infectious Diseases of Poverty

ISSN: 2049-9957

Contact us