Intended for healthcare professionals

Editorials

Surgery for spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis

BMJ 2024; 386 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q1628 (Published 07 August 2024) Cite this as: BMJ 2024;386:q1628

Linked Research

Decompression alone or with fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Nordsten-DS)

  1. Anders Joelson, consultant spine surgeon
  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Orebro University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to: A Joelson anders{at}joelson.se

Trial provides evidence that decompression alone is not inferior to decompression with fusion

Controversy continues about the best surgical option for patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and concomitant degenerative spondylolisthesis. At the centre of this controversy is a debate on the efficacy of decompression alone versus decompression with fusion. In this context, durability has been defined as maintenance of clinical benefit without the need for additional intervention.1 The potential benefit of fusion surgery in terms of durability should be weighed against the risks of future reoperations because of adjacent segment disease. Previous randomised controlled trials and observational register studies did little to settle the controversy because the results were inconsistent.2345678910 Three previous randomised controlled trials (two from Scandinavia and one from Japan) reported findings favouring decompression without fusion,234 whereas one randomised controlled trial from the US reported findings favouring decompression with fusion.5 Specifically, the US randomised controlled trial reported significantly higher reoperation rates for patients managed with decompression …

View Full Text

Log in

Log in through your institution

Subscribe

* For online subscription