Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Sex Differences in Visual Attention to Erotic and Non-Erotic Stimuli

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been suggested that sex differences in the processing of erotic material (e.g., memory, genital arousal, brain activation patterns) may also be reflected by differential attention to visual cues in erotic material. To test this hypothesis, we presented 20 heterosexual men and 20 heterosexual women with erotic and non-erotic images of heterosexual couples and tracked their eye movements during scene presentation. Results supported previous findings that erotic and non-erotic information was visually processed in a different manner by both men and women. Men looked at opposite sex figures significantly longer than did women, and women looked at same sex figures significantly longer than did men. Within-sex analyses suggested that men had a strong visual attention preference for opposite sex figures as compared to same sex figures, whereas women appeared to disperse their attention evenly between opposite and same sex figures. These differences, however, were not limited to erotic images but evidenced in non-erotic images as well. No significant sex differences were found for attention to the contextual region of the scenes. Results were interpreted as potentially supportive of recent studies showing a greater non-specificity of sexual arousal in women. This interpretation assumes there is an erotic valence to images of the sex to which one orients, even when the image is not explicitly erotic. It also assumes a relationship between visual attention and erotic valence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anokhin, A. P., Golosheykin, S., Sirevaag, E., Kristijansson, S., Rohrbaugh, J. W., & Heath, A. C. (2006). Rapid discrimination of visual scene content in the human brain. Brain Research, 1093, 167–177.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, M. G., & Lang, P. J. (2004). Gaze patterns when looking at emotional pictures: Motivationally biased attention. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 221–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L. (2005). A brief review and discussion of sex differences in the specificity of sexual arousal. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L. (2006). Do women have a “sexual orientation?” Insights from female sexual psychophysiology. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research, Amsterdam.

  • Chivers, M. L., Rieger, G., Latty, E., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Psychological Science, 15, 736–744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A., & Mazzella, R. (1998). Gender differences in body image are increasing. Psychological Science, 9, 190–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H., & Bellard, H. S. (1996). Sexual content induced delays in unprimed lexical decisions: Gender and context effects. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25, 379–395.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H., Judice, S., & Jackson, S. (1994). Reading times for erotic material: The pause to reflect. Journal of General Psychology, 121, 345–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H., & Manguno-Mire, G. M. (1996). Gender differences in cognitive processes in sexuality. Annual Review of Sex Research, 7, 90–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H., & McGlone, M. S. (1990). Sex differences in memory for erotica. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H., & Melton, J. S. (1997). Sexual content-induced delays with double-entendre words. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 295–316.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H., & Robertson, G. G. (2005). Implicit attitudes in sexuality: Gender differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 671–677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, S., Herman, R., Nolan, C. L., & Wallen, K. (2004). Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 411–416.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 243–271.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 210–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, E., Carpenter, D., & Graham, C. (2003). Selecting film clips for sex research: Gender differences in erotic film preference. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 243–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones Carlson, D. (2001). Social comparison and body image: Attractiveness comparisons to models and peers among adolescent girls and boys. Sex Roles, 45, 645–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch-Rosenkrantz, J., & Geer, J. H. (1991). Gender differences in memory for a sexual story. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20, 295–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laan, E., Everaerd, W., van Bellen, G., & Hanewald, G. (1994). Women’s sexual and emotional responses to male- and female-produced erotica. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 153–169.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 469–496.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2005). Gender, nature, and nurture (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundquist, D., & Ohman, A. (2005). Emotion regulates attention: The relation between facial configurations, facial emotion, and visual attention. Visual Cognition, 12, 51–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykins, A. D., Meana, M., & Kambe, G. (2006). Detection of differential viewing patterns to erotic and non-erotic stimuli using eye-tracking methodology. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 569–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meuwissen, I., & Over, R. (1991). Multidimensionality of the content of female sexual fantasy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29, 179–189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. L., & MacIan, P. (1994). College men and women respond to X-rated videos intended for male or female audiences: Gender and sexual scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K. (1995). Eye movements and cognitive processes in reading, visual search, and scene perception. In J. M. Findley, R. Walker, & R. W. Kentridge (Eds.), Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes and applications (pp. 3–22). New York: Elsevier Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G., Sigusch, V., & Schafer, S. (1973). Responses to reading erotic stories: Male-female differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2, 181–199.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sigusch, V., Schmidt, G., Reinfeld, A., & Wiedermann-Sutor, I. W. (1970). Psychosexual stimulation: Sex differences. Journal of Sex Research, 6, 10–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., & Over, R. (1991). Male sexual fantasy: Multidimensionality in content. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29, 267–275.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tokatlidis, O., & Over, R. (1995). Imagery, fantasy, and female sexual arousal. Australian Journal of Psychology, 47, 81–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. W. (1990). The sexual vocabularies of heterosexual and homosexual males and females for communicating erotically with a sexual partner. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19, 139–147.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Youn, G. (2006). Subjective sexual arousal in response to erotica: Effects of gender, guided fantasy, erotic stimulus, and duration of exposure. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 87–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Box 455030, Las Vegas, NV, 89154-5030, USA

    Amy D. Lykins, Marta Meana & Gregory P. Strauss

Authors
  1. Amy D. Lykins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marta Meana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gregory P. Strauss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy D. Lykins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lykins, A.D., Meana, M. & Strauss, G.P. Sex Differences in Visual Attention to Erotic and Non-Erotic Stimuli. Arch Sex Behav 37, 219–228 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9208-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9208-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation