Issuing disputes
Learn how to use Issuing to dispute transactions.
The purpose of a dispute is to recover funds for captured transactions. Disputes are often used to correct fraudulent transactions or problems with the quality or delivery of the product.
Stripe offers a guided Dashboard process and an API to submit disputes and monitor them through to resolution. This process typically takes between 30 and 90 days. If you only manage occasional disputes, we recommend using the Dashboard. If you manage a high volume of disputes, we recommend programmatically managing disputes using the API.
If you think a card has been compromised, cancel and replace it using the Dashboard or the API before continuing with the dispute process.
Considerations before initiating a dispute
Requirements for fraud disputes
Platforms must allow their connected accounts to submit fraudulent disputes directly to Stripe through a dashboard that you, as the Platform, make available using our APIs or embedded components. You canât restrict their ability to submit such disputes in any way. After fraud disputes are submitted, Stripe will review them to determine if the cardholder needs to be reimbursed.
Non-fraud disputes
Make sure that the cardholder has exhausted other means of resolving the issue. They must attempt to return any products they received, cancel any ongoing services, and seek a refund directly from the business. Collect documentation of these attempts to use as evidence when filing the dispute.
Blocked dispute submissions
Stripe might block fraud dispute submission if the transaction doesnât qualify for fraud protection under local regulations and the account holder has no dispute rights according to network rules.
For platforms
If youâre obligated to submit a dispute and you submit it, youâve fulfilled your obligation, regardless of if Stripe blocks the submission.
Card networks might consider a dispute invalid for the following reasons (among others):
- The transaction is a refund and not a capture.
- The transaction is a mobile push payment transaction.
- More than 110 days have passed since the business captured the transaction.
- However, if you plan to file an Authorization dispute, this deadline is shorter:
- For Visa, the transaction was captured more than 65 days ago.
- For Mastercard, the transaction was captured more than 80 days ago.
- However, if you plan to file an Authorization dispute, this deadline is shorter:
In the Dashboard, the dispute transaction button is only enabled for eligible transactions. In the API, attempting to dispute an ineligible transaction results in an error.
Lifecycle
Business terminology
In the above diagram, business refers to the acquiring business, the business receiving the payment.
Newly-created disputes begin in an unsubmitted
status. At this point, you can update their evidence and metadata. After youâve added all the required evidence, you can then submit the dispute. If you donât submit a dispute within 110 days of the transaction clearing, its status becomes expired
.
Stripe and card networks process disputes that have a status of submitted
. As such, you canât update dispute evidence, but you can still update their metadata
. Submitted disputes enter into a multi-step process defined by card networks and participating banks. After a dispute is resolved, Stripe transitions it to either the terminal won
or lost
status.
Creation
Fill out the Dispute Amount field to indicate the disputed amount (full or partial). The fieldâs initial value is the transaction amount. Submissions that have empty Dispute Amount fields create disputes with the full transaction amount.
Dispute Amount field on the Issuing dispute creation page
Update
Submission
Resolution
Stripe processes disputes according to card network rules. These rules are updated twice a year. You can review the latest rules on each networkâs website:
- Visa: Visa Core Rules and Visa Product and Service Rules
- Mastercard: Mastercard Rules
- The Mastercard Chargeback guide is especially useful for understanding Mastercardâs dispute rules.
Testing
Webhooks
To be notified of changes to your disputes, you can listen for Issuing dispute webhook events. All Issuing dispute events contain the updated Dispute object.
Webhook events | Trigger |
---|---|
issuing_ | Dispute created. |
issuing_ | Dispute updated. |
issuing_ | Dispute submitted. |
issuing_ | Funds transferred to your Issuing balance (usually associated with won dispute status). |
issuing_ | Funds deducted from your Issuing balance (usually associated with a provisional credit clawback). |
issuing_ | Dispute transitioned into a won , lost , or expired status. |
Dispute reasons and evidence
You must submit supporting documentation with a dispute. The quality of this documentation directly influences your chances of winning and the strongest disputes have clear, descriptive documentation. All relevant information or documentation must be included when you first submit the dispute.
The type of documentation required depends on the reason for the dispute. Because of this, itâs important to choose the correct reason.
Disputes can be submitted with one of these reasons:
- Canceled: The cardholder canceled or returned merchandise or canceled services, and the business didnât process a credit or void a transaction receipt.
- Duplicate: Covers processing error dispute types, including duplicate transaction, incorrect amount, paid by other means, and so on.
- Fraudulent: The cardholderâs details were compromised and the transaction wasnât authorized by them.
- Merchandise not as described: The cardholder received the merchandise, but it didnât match what was presented at time of purchase, or it was damaged or defective.
- Not received: The cardholder participated in the transaction but didnât receive the merchandise or service.
- No valid authorization: (API only) The business processed a transaction without a valid authorization.
- Service not as described: The cardholder received the service, but it didnât match what was presented at time of purchase.
- Other: A dispute scenario that doesnât clearly qualify as any other dispute reason. Authorization disputes might have this reason (for example, if filed through the Dashboard).
In the Dashboard, Merchandise not as described
and Service not as described
are consolidated under Not as described
.
Each reason requires a different set of evidence:
Fraud disputes
You can dispute a transaction for fraud if the cardholderâs card details were compromised and they didnât authorize the transaction.
Before filing a dispute:
- Confirm with the cardholder that they didnât make the transaction in error, and that it wasnât made by someone known to them. Transactions made by a friend or family member, for example, donât constitute fraud for dispute purposes.
- Cancel the affected card.
In certain situations, you can lose fraud dispute rights for a transaction:
- For card-present transactions: A card network might automatically reject a fraud dispute because liability defaults to the issuer.
- For card-not-present transactions: A card network might automatically reject a fraud dispute if the cardholder was authenticated during the transaction. That often happens when 3D Secure was requested or a secured payment method like Apple Pay was used.
Authorization disputes
Each time an acquiring business processes a transaction, they must first request an authorization from the issuer. If a business captures a payment without a valid authorization, you can dispute the transaction. The reason you should choose depends on the method used to submit the dispute:
- Filing a dispute through the API: File the dispute under the
no_
reason.valid_ authorization - Filing a dispute through the Dashboard: File the dispute under the
other
reason and specify in theexplanation
field that the business didnât get a valid authorization.
Authorization disputes are distinct from fraud disputes:
- File a fraud dispute when the cardholder didnât participate in the transaction. For example, a thief stole their card and used it.
- File an authorization dispute when the business didnât have a valid authorization for the transaction. For example, they captured a payment 2 days after its authorization expired.
A common reason for an authorization dispute is an overcapture. An overcapture occurs when the captured amount exceeds the authorized amount. When you submit an authorization dispute for an overcapture, you must adjust the dispute amount to include only the amount that exceeded the authorization.
Note
Some Merchant Category Codes (MCCs) allow overcaptures of certain amounts or disallow authorization disputes. For details, refer to the current card network rules for your region.
A card network can reject an authorization dispute if the transaction had a valid authorization. In the case of an overcapture, it can reject the dispute if the disputed amount doesnât take into account the allowed overcapture amount for the associated MCC.
Withdrawing
Stripe can only withdraw a dispute within 1 day of its submission to the card network. If you want to withdraw a dispute, contact Stripe Support immediately.
Liability for fraud (platforms in the USA)
Most aspects of Regulation Z donât apply to business-purpose cards, but Regulation Z does protect users of business-purpose cards from fraud and other types of âunauthorized card use," which means the use of a charge card by a person who doesnât have the authority to use it. In most cases, an accountholder canât be held responsible for unauthorized use of cards linked to their account unless a reasonable investigation into the fraud is conducted. However, if the account holder has 10 or more employee authorized users, they might not qualify for this protection.
When one of your users disputes a transaction because the user believes it was unauthorized, Stripe sends the dispute to the card network for adjudication (as with any other type of disputed transaction). Stripe or the card network determines who must pay for the fraud: you or the business.
If Stripe or the card network determines the business is liable for the fraud, then neither you nor your user are responsible for the disputed transactions.
If Stripe or the card network determines that youâre liable for the fraud, then you might be required to pay for the disputed transaction. Stripe performs a reasonable investigation into the dispute to determine whether fraud actually occurred or whether the user doesnât qualify for protection under Regulation Z. If the investigation uncovers that unauthorized card use actually occurred and that the user qualifies for protection, then you remain liable for the unauthorized transactions. Alternatively, if the investigation uncovers that unauthorized card use didnât occur or that the user doesnât qualify for protection, then we hold the accountholder responsible for the disputed charges.
Emailing connect accounts
Issuing platforms must send regulated notice emails to connected accounts when a dispute is submitted, and again when a dispute is won or lost. Learn more about regulated notices.
Use with Stripe Treasury
Disputes of ReceivedDebits
on FinancialAccounts
have a corresponding DebitReversal after the dispute is submitted.