Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection-24
review-ietf-lamps-header-protection-24-secdir-lc-mundy-2024-11-09-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 24) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2024-03-25 | |
Requested | 2024-03-04 | |
Authors | Daniel Kahn Gillmor , Bernie Hoeneisen , Alexey Melnikov | |
I-D last updated | 2024-11-09 | |
Completed reviews |
Artart Last Call review of -20
by Bron Gondwana
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -20 by Peter E. Yee (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -24 by Russ Mundy |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Russ Mundy |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/WGN1NNuR8nm2rqwwYQ3yc7ZSvyA | |
Reviewed revision | 24 | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2024-11-09 |
review-ietf-lamps-header-protection-24-secdir-lc-mundy-2024-11-09-00
Secdir review of draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection Reviewer: Russ Mundy Review Result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document was produced by the LAMPS Working Group and is currently titled Header Protection for Cryptographically Protected E-mail. As the title says, it specifies mechanisms for protecting e-mail headers. Overall, I found the document to be very well written and structured with many informative use cases and examples. With respect to the Security Considerations section, it is well reasoned and thorough as well as being an integral part of the document (rather than an after thought like many IDs). In fact, I believe this is the best Security Considerations section that I ever recall reading. Well done authors, contributors and LAMPS Working Group!