Jump to content

User talk:Wilfredor

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:The Photographer)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spiral staircase in the Vatican Museums from bottom 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. The people looking down are creepy, though. --Crisco 1492 01:21, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helianthus annuus - Jardin universitaire Roger-Van den Hende, Quebec 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:13, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praying person in Evangel Pentecostal Church Quebec City, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Fantastic image, and all the personality rights are marked. --Crisco 1492 00:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prepared food display in an Italian deli in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 00:55, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro Ticket machines in Bavaria, from Munich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:15, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exterior of Theatinerkirche, Munich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:09, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isartor in Munich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:15, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hercules catches the Erymanthian boar. Statuette in the Munich Residenzmuseum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Shadows at the edge are distracting. --Crisco 1492 00:15, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks --Wilfredor 01:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support QI for me. Gradient at thumbnail is much less pronounced at full resolution. --Crisco 1492 08:55, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Person being baptized in Evangel Pentecostal Church Quebec City, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Baptismal basin appears warped (slightly arced) --Crisco 1492 00:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I remember that the pastor had been searching for a portable baptismal pool or baptistry for quite some time. Eventually, another church agreed to lend theirs, but we had to travel to their location. To my surprise, it was a metal container that looked old and warped with age. I believe this might have caused the edge to appear the way it does. However, the focal length used in the photo, over 200mm, also makes proper framing difficult. In this case, I can't say for certain whether the distortion is due to the baptismal tank itself or a framing error on my part. --Wilfredor 01:06, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Fair enough. If it's a portable basin, "straight" is a relative term. Good quality. --Crisco 1492 08:55, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]