Skip to main content
BMC journals have moved to Springer Nature Link. Learn more about website changes.
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. BMC Public Health
  3. Article

A qualitative exploration of community kitchens to reduce household food waste as a public health intervention

  • Research
  • Open access
  • Published: 10 December 2025
  • article number , (2025)
  • Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Download PDF
BMC Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript
A qualitative exploration of community kitchens to reduce household food waste as a public health intervention
Download PDF
  • China R. Harrison1,2,3,
  • Jenna Parton4,
  • Patricia E. Jessiman1,
  • Rona Campbell1 &
  • …
  • Frank de Vocht1 

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Abstract

Background

Household food waste (HHFW) has been described as a contemporary multifactorial problem impacting the environment, economy, society and health. Community kitchens have been found to have public health benefits for social wellbeing and nutrition. However, few community kitchens have been developed and implemented with the primary aim of reducing HHFW. This research focuses on the community kitchen scheme in Leicestershire that was established to engage individuals with HHFW issues and build community capacity to deal with food waste effectively and sustainably. The aims of the research were to explore how aligned the aims of the community kitchens were to the reasons why participants attend, and the benefits experienced from participating.

Methods

The research used a short survey of attendees (n = 33), observations of community kitchen sessions (n = 4) and individual semi-structured interviews with attendees (n = 14), volunteers (n = 3) and Borough Council staff (n = 2). Quantitative data was, analysed descriptively, and qualitative data was analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

Findings suggest a gap between the reasons behind the development and implementation of the community kitchen scheme, their intended impact and the actual practices and benefits experienced by participants. Reducing HHFW was not found to be the core element, nor a reason for why people chose to attend. The community kitchens were, however, valued and considered worthwhile by participants, volunteers, and staff. In alignment with other data on the value of community kitchens, they were found to be beneficial particularly in terms of offering opportunities to socialise in an inclusive, supportive environment.

Conclusion

A refocus of the community kitchens as a scheme to provide social benefits, is likely to improve the scheme’s reach and subsequent contribution to the health and wellbeing of socially isolated individuals.

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Data availability

Anonymised survey data, qualitative transcripts, and observation fieldnotes, used during the current study are available from the first author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HHFW:

Household food waste

WRAP:

Waste and Resources Action Programme

LCC:

Leicestershire County Council

LFHW:

Love food hate waste

References

  1. Aycinena AC, Jennings KA, Gaffney AO, Koch PA, Contento IR, Gonzalez M, Guidon E, Karmally W, Hershman D, Greenlee H. ¡ cocinar Para Su Salud! Development of a culturally based nutrition education curriculum for Hispanic breast cancer survivors using a theory-driven procedural model. Health Educ Behav. 2017;44(1):13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rees R, Hinds K, Dickson K, O’Mara-Eves A, Thomas J. Communities that cook: A systematic review of the effectiveness and appropriateness of interventions to introduce adults to home cooking: executive summary. J Home Econ Inst Australia. 2012;19(3):31–2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reicks M, Trofholz AC, Stang JS, Laska MN. Impact of cooking and home food Preparation interventions among adults: outcomes and implications for future programs. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014;46(4):259–76.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lock L, Williams H, Bamford B, Lacey JH. The St george’s eating disorders service meal Preparation group for inpatients and day patients pursuing full recovery: a pilot study. Eur Eat Disorders Rev. 2012;20(3):218–24.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Engler-Stringer R, Berenbaum S. Collective kitchens in canada: a review of the literature. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2005;66(4):246–51.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Iacovou M, Pattieson DC, Truby H, Palermo C. Social health and nutrition impacts of community kitchens: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(3):535–43.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JH, McCartan J, Palermo C, Bryce A. Process evaluation of community kitchens: results from two Victorian local government areas. Health Promotion J Australia. 2010;21(3):183–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marquis S, Thomson C, Murray A. Assisting people with a low income: to start and maintain their own community kitchens. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2001;62(3):130.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crawford SM, Kalina L. Building food security through health promotion: community kitchens. J Can Diet Association. 1997. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Building-food-security-through-health-promotion%3A-Crawford-Kalina/441fd58e5899ce26f309f5a4966c551831c80a56.

  10. Engler-Stringer R, Berenbaum S. Food and nutrition-related learning in collective kitchens in three Canadian cities. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2006;67(4):178–83.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Engler-Stringer R, Berenbaum S. Exploring food security with collective kitchens participants in three Canadian cities. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(1):75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tarasuk V, Reynolds R. A qualitative study of community kitchens as a response to income-related food insecurity. Can J Diet Pract Res. 1999;60(1):11.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Loopstra R, Tarasuk V. Perspectives on community gardens, community kitchens and the good food box program in a community-based sample of low-income families. Can J Public Health. 2013;104(1):e55–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fano TJ, Tyminski SM, Flynn MA. Evaluation of a collective kitchens program using the population health promotion. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2004;65(2):72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fernandez NL. Collective kitchens: knowledge, formats, and issues. 1996. http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec.

  16. Racine S, St-Onge M. Les cuisines collectives: Une Voie vers La promotion de La santé mentale [Collective kitchens: A way toward the promotion of mental health]. Can J Community Mental Health. 2000;19(1):37–62.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ripat G. Community kitchens in Winnipeg, people cooking together, building community together. 1998. (Master’s thesis). http://hdl.handle.net/1993/1452.

  18. Tarasuk V. A critical examination of community-based responses to household food insecurity in Canada. Health Educ Behav. 2001;28(4):487–99.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Racine S, St-Onge M. Les cuisines collectives: Une Voie vers La promotion de La santé mentale. Can J Community Mental Health. 2009;19(1):37–62.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Grycuk E, Chen Y, Almirall-Sanchez A, Higgins D, Galvin M, Kane J, Kinchin I, Lawlor B, Rogan C, Russell G, O’Sullivan R. Care burden, loneliness, and social isolation in caregivers of people with physical and brain health conditions in English‐speaking regions: before and during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022;37(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5734.

  21. Fakoya OA, McCorry NK, Donnelly M. Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Landeiro F, Barrows P, Musson EN, Gray AM, Leal J. Reducing social isolation and loneliness in older people: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2017;7(5):e013778.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dickens AP, Richards SH, Greaves CJ, Campbell JL. Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Social Care Institute for Excellence S. SCIE: At a glance 60: Preventing loneliness and social isolation among older people. 2012. Available from: [cited 2019 May 28]. https://www.scie.org.uk/publications/ataglance/ataglance60.asp.

  25. Bernard S. Loneliness and Social isolation among older people in North Yorkshire project commissioned by North Yorkshire older People’s partnership board executive summary. 2013; Available from: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/77336/1/Lone.pdf.

  26. Berkman LF, Krishna A, Kawachi I, Glymour MM. 7: social network epidemiology. Social Epidemiol. 2014:234–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780195377903.003.0007.

  27. Shoham DA, Messer LC. Social network analysis for epidemiology. Methods in social epidemiology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Von Massow M, Parizeau K, Gallant M, Wickson M, Haines J, Ma DW, Wallace A, Carroll N, Duncan AM. Valuing the multiple impacts of household food waste. Front Nutr. 2019;6:143.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Foodshare. 2023. FareShare Registered charity. Retrieved 5th June 2023. https://fareshare.org.uk/what-we-do/hunger-food-waste/.

  30. WRAP registers. as a charity | WRAP UK. 1 December 2014. Retrieved 20 November 2021. https://www.wrap.ngo/.

  31. Brennan A, Browne S. Food waste and nutrition quality in the context of public health: A scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(10):5379.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cakar B, Aydin S, Varank G, Ozcan HK. Assessment of environmental impact of FOOD waste in Turkey. J Clean Prod. 2020;244:118846.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shukla PR, Skea J, Calvo Buendia E, Masson-Delmotte V, Pörtner HO, Roberts DC, Zhai P, Slade R, Connors S, Van Diemen R, Ferrat MIPCC. 2019: Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157988.

  34. Fami HS, Aramyan LH, Sijtsema SJ, Alambaigi A. The relationship between household food waste and food security in Tehran city: the role of urban women in household management. Ind Mark Manage. 2021;97:71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  35. GOUDIE S. Is the UK’s supply of fruit and vegetables future proof? 2022. https://shefsglobal.lshtm.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/SHEFS_Fruit-and-Veg-Briefing-1-FINAL.pdf.

  36. Van Geffen L, van Herpen E, van Trijp H. Household food waste—How to avoid it? An integrative review. Food Waste Management: Solving Wicked Problem. 2020:27–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20561-4_2.

  37. Harrison CR, Jessiman PE, Campbell RM, de Vocht F. A mixed methods process evaluation of the Leicestershire community kitchen scheme. https://openresearch.nihr.ac.uk/documents/3-39.

  38. Harrison CR, Jessiman PE, Campbell RM, de Vocht F. Mixed methods process evaluation of the Leicestershire community kitchens scheme. PHIRST Insight. https://phirst.nihr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/PHIRST-insight-P5-Report-for-LCC-FINAL_Jan23.pdf.

  39. Stata Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp. LLC; 2017.

  40. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jones M, Hills S, Ismail S, Beardmore A. Good food and building community capacity through cook and share grants. https://www.fflgettogethers.org/media/dy0b44or/uwe_longrep.pdf.

  42. Hersch D, Perdue L, Ambroz T, Boucher JL. The impact of cooking classes on food-related preferences, attitudes, and behaviors of school-aged children: a systematic review of the evidence, 2003–2014. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E193.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Heikkinen RL, Kauppinen M. Depressive symptoms in late life: a 10-year follow-up. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2004;38(3):239–50.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Patterson AC, Veenstra G. Loneliness and risk of mortality: A longitudinal investigation in Alameda County. Calif Social Sci Med. 2010;71(1):181–6.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wilson DM, Harris A, Hollis V, Mohankumar D. Upstream thinking and health promotion planning for older adults at risk of social isolation. Int J Older People Nurs. 2011;6(4):282–8.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Glasgow RE, et al. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. Am J Publ Health. 2012;99(2):279–80.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Quested TE, Marsh E, Stunell D, Parry AD. Spaghetti soup: the complex world of food waste behaviours. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2013;79:43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  48. O’Mara-Eves A. Community engagement to reduce inequalities in health: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysis. Publ Health Res. 2015;3(2). https://doi.org/10.3310/phr01040.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank you, Rachel Duncan and Shirley Cobby from Leicestershire Borough Council and Leicestershire County Council, specifically Matthew Copley, James O’Brien and Nailesh Ramaiya for their contributions throughout this research. Thank you also to our PPI members and all the participants who participated in the study.

Funding

This study/project is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Intervention Responsive Studies Team (PHIRST/NIHR131567).

C.H.’s time is supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Evaluation and Behavioural Science (EBS) at the University of Bristol, in partnership with the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care, or UKHSA. Funders were not involved in data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. PHIRST insight, Centre for Public Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS12NT, UK

    China R. Harrison, Patricia E. Jessiman, Rona Campbell & Frank de Vocht

  2. National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK

    China R. Harrison

  3. National Institute for Health Research, Health Protection Research Unit (HBU) in Evaluation and Behavioural Science (EBS), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK

    China R. Harrison

  4. Leicestershire Public Health Team, Leicestershire County Council, County Hall, Glenfield, LE3 8RA, UK

    Jenna Parton

Authors
  1. China R. Harrison
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jenna Parton
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patricia E. Jessiman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rona Campbell
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Frank de Vocht
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CH, PJ, JP, RC & FdV contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by CH. The first draft of the manuscript was written by CH. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to China R. Harrison.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for the study was awarded by the University of Bristol’s Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics committee in March 2022 (ref. 10175) and has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 2013 Declaration of Helsinki. All informed consents had been obtained from the eligible participants before initiating data collection.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Material 1.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harrison, C.R., Parton, J., Jessiman, P.E. et al. A qualitative exploration of community kitchens to reduce household food waste as a public health intervention. BMC Public Health (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25903-2

Download citation

  • Received: 16 July 2024

  • Accepted: 02 December 2025

  • Published: 10 December 2025

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25903-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Community kitchens
  • Health and wellbeing
  • Household food waste
  • Leicestershire
  • Process evaluation
  • Social interaction
  • Social isolation
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

62.146.181.81

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature